Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Different Dose Levels of EXC 001 to Improve the Appearance of Scars in Subjects Undergoing Elective Abdominoplasty (NCT NCT01038297)
NCT ID: NCT01038297
Last Updated: 2021-09-20
Results Overview
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 mm = best possible scar and a score of 100 mm = worst possible scar, where higher scores indicate worse condition. The difference was calculated for scars at Week 13 as EXC 001 score minus placebo score, thus a negative difference would indicate that the EXC 001-treated scars had lower scar severity. The score was defined as the within participant average difference between EXC 001- and Placebo-treated scars at Week 13.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
30 participants
Week 13 of Part B
2021-09-20
Participant Flow
Participants who had chosen and qualified (had sufficient excess abdominal tissue) for a standard elective abdominoplasty were recruited in this study. The study was conducted in two-parts: Part A (Skin Testing Phase) and Part B (Active Dosing Phase). Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A entered into Part B .
Part B (incision wounds \[IW\] and abdominoplasty surgery): On Day 1, participants received 20 incisions (2 centimeters \[cm\] each), 10 incisions on either side of the midline (4 vertical columns of 4 incisions each, 2 columns of 2 incisions \[lateral biomarker incisions\]), on the abdominal area to be removed during abdominoplasty.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1: EXC 001 and Placebo
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Cohort 2: EXC 001 and Placebo
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Cohort 3: EXC 001 and Placebo
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 6 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Skin Testing Phase (50 Days)
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Part A: Skin Testing Phase (50 Days)
COMPLETED
|
9
|
10
|
10
|
|
Part A: Skin Testing Phase (50 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part B: Active Dosing Phase (13 Weeks)
STARTED
|
9
|
10
|
10
|
|
Part B: Active Dosing Phase (13 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
9
|
10
|
10
|
|
Part B: Active Dosing Phase (13 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1: EXC 001 and Placebo
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Cohort 2: EXC 001 and Placebo
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Cohort 3: EXC 001 and Placebo
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 6 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Skin Testing Phase (50 Days)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study of Different Dose Levels of EXC 001 to Improve the Appearance of Scars in Subjects Undergoing Elective Abdominoplasty
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1: EXC 001 and Placebo
n=10 Participants
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 mg on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Cohort 2: EXC 001 and Placebo
n=10 Participants
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Cohort 3: EXC 001 and Placebo
n=10 Participants
In Part A participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study. In Part B participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 6 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Total
n=30 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 13 of Part BPopulation: Completer population included all participants who missed not more than 1 dose of study drug, had the Week 13 assessment and non-missing data for VAS scar assessment score for at least one dose level.
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 mm = best possible scar and a score of 100 mm = worst possible scar, where higher scores indicate worse condition. The difference was calculated for scars at Week 13 as EXC 001 score minus placebo score, thus a negative difference would indicate that the EXC 001-treated scars had lower scar severity. The score was defined as the within participant average difference between EXC 001- and Placebo-treated scars at Week 13.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score
|
-3.16 millimeters
Standard Deviation 7.687
|
0.18 millimeters
Standard Deviation 7.154
|
1.45 millimeters
Standard Deviation 12.450
|
2.91 millimeters
Standard Deviation 9.778
|
-4.78 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.326
|
-4.05 millimeters
Standard Deviation 8.934
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 13 of Part BPopulation: Completer population included all participants who missed not more than 1 dose of study drug, had the Week 13 assessment and non-missing data for VAS scar assessment score for at least one dose level.
Physician observer global assessment of scar score was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physicians rated severity of each scar on a scale of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable. Each scar was given a single score and the differences in scores between the matched pairs of scars were calculated. There were 4 differences within each dose level that were averaged to create a single score for each participant at each dose level. The score was defined as the within participant average difference between EXC 001 and Placebo.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Physician Observer Global Assessment Scar Score
|
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.362
|
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.193
|
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.448
|
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.848
|
-0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.965
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.153
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part B: Day 1 up to Week 14Population: Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Following vital sign parameters were assessed: diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, temperature and weight. Number of participants with clinically significant change in any vital sign parameter compared to Baseline were reported. Criteria for clinically significant change in any vital sign parameter compared to baseline was based on investigator's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part B: Day 1 up to Week 14Population: Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of Part A and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Physical examination included the assessment of skin; head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat; respiratory; cardiovascular; abdomen; musculoskeletal; neurological; gastrointestinal; genitourinary; endocrine and lymph nodes. Criteria for clinically significant findings in physical examination was based on investigator's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Findings
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 13 of Part BPopulation: Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's correction (QTc), heart rate (HR). A standard, single 12-lead ECG was taken and results was classified as normal, having a clinically insignificant abnormality, or having a clinically significant abnormality. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in ECG compared to baseline were reported. Criteria for clinically significant abnormality in ECG compared to baseline was based on investigator's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part B: Day 1 up to Week 13Population: Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Laboratory analysis included hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis. Hematology range: basophils (bas) 0-0.2, eosinophils (eos) 0-0.4, leukocytes (leu) 4-10.5, lymphocytes (lym) 0.7-4.5, neutrophils (neu) 1.8-7.8, platelet 140-415, monocytes (mon) 0.1-1 in 10\^9 per liter; bas/leu 0-3, eos/leu 0-7, lym/leu 14-46, mon/leu 4-13, neu/leu and neu/leu 40-74 in percentage, erythrocytes 3.8-5.1 10\^12/L, hematocrit 0.34-0.44 L/L, hemoglobin 115-150 gram per liter (g/L). Biochemistry range: creatine kinase 24-173, alkaline phosphatase 25-150, alanine aminotransferase (AT) and aspartate AT 0-40 in International units per liter; creatinine 50-88, urate 89-399, bilirubin 2-21 in micromole per liter, glucose 3.6-5.5, potassium 3.5-5.5, sodium 135-148, blood urea nitrogen 1.8-9.3 in millimole/L, albumin 35-55 g/L. Urinalysis parameters: pH (5-7.5), specific gravity (1.005-1.03). Participants with clinically significant abnormal change in any laboratory parameter compared to baseline were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Findings
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 21 of Part A up to Week 2 of Part BPopulation: Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The skin sensitivity reaction was assessed only at the skin sensitivity reaction testing sites. Erythematous, raised (indurated) and edematous reactions were considered as positive skin sensitivity reactions. The number of participants that experienced any positive skin sensitivity reactions were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 High Dose (5.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 Low Dose (1.0 mg/Linear cm) + Placebo
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm) in 1 vertical column and 1 lateral biomarker incision on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 on the other side at Week 2, 6 and 10.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Positive Skin Sensitivity Reaction
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part A: Cohort 1: EXC 001
Part A: Cohort 2: EXC 001
Part A: Cohort 3: EXC 001
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 and Placebo
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 and Placebo
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 and Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part A: Cohort 1: EXC 001
n=10 participants at risk
Participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study.
|
Part A: Cohort 2: EXC 001
n=10 participants at risk
Participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study.
|
Part A: Cohort 3: EXC 001
n=10 participants at risk
Participants received single intradermal injections of EXC-001 at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) on Day 1 and 21. Third 5 mg intradermal injection was administered at the discretion of Investigator based on the event of an equivocal skin sensitization on Day 38 or at least 7 days prior to surgery (Day 1 in Part B). The injection site was evaluated immediately after the injection and on Days 21, 28, 38, 50 until day of surgery. Participants with negative skin sensitization in Part A were assigned to Part B of the study.
|
Part B: Cohort 1: EXC 001 and Placebo
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Part B: Cohort 2: EXC 001 and Placebo
n=10 participants at risk
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 5, 8 and 11. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
Part B: Cohort 3: EXC 001 and Placebo
n=10 participants at risk
Participants received intradermal injections of EXC 001 on 1 side of the abdominal incisions and on the other side received intradermal injections of placebo matched to EXC 001 at Week 2, 6 and 10. On the EXC 001 treated side 1 column received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Out of 2 lateral biomarker incisions 1 incision received high dose (5.0 mg/linear cm) and other a low dose (1.0 mg/linear cm). Participants received an abdominoplasty at week 13 with a follow-up post-surgery visit at week 14.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site erythema
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
66.7%
6/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
60.0%
6/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
70.0%
7/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
20.0%
2/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site oedema
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
20.0%
2/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site complication
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
22.2%
2/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tenosynovitis stenosans
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
11.1%
1/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
10.0%
1/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/9
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
0.00%
0/10
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Safety population included participants who completed Part A Day 1 visit of and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Safety assessment was not planned separately for EXC 001 and placebo in Part B.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER