Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of an MF59-Adjuvanted Versus Non-Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccines in Patients With Chronic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Heart Disease, or Diabetes Mellitus
NCT ID: NCT01032395
Last Updated: 2013-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
342 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Because certain individuals may be hypo-responsive to influenza vaccination, additional studies with high-risk groups are warranted in order to determine the optimal vaccine formulation and dosing schedule for prevention of novel H1N1 virus infection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Sub-unit Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine Administered to Elderly Subjects, Formulation 2011-2012
NCT01344057
Study of Immune Responses to Influenza Vaccination
NCT03346772
B-cell Immunity to Influenza (SLVP017) - Years 2 (2010) & 3 (2011)
NCT03020498
Humoral and Cell Mediated Immunity and Safety of MF59C.1-adjuvanted Subunit Influenza Vaccine or a Conventional Subunit Influenza Vaccine in Previously Unvaccinated Healthy Subjects
NCT01342796
Impact of FLU Vaccination on Nasal Resident Memory Immune Responses and Peripheral Respiratory-tropic Memory Immune Responses
NCT06824779
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chronic Disease Subjects Receiving Vaccine with Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine with adjuvant (Focetria® or Fluad®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22.
Focetria®
7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent
Fluad®
15 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; trivalent
Chronic Disease Subjects Receiving Vaccine without Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine without adjuvant (Begrivac®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22.
Begrivac®
15 ug of antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent
Healthy Subjects Receiving Vaccine with Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine with adjuvant (Focetria® or Flaud®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22.
Focetria®
7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent
Fluad®
15 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; trivalent
Healthy Subjects Receiving Vaccine without Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine without adjuvant (Begrivac®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22.
Begrivac®
15 ug of antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Focetria®
7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent
Fluad®
15 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; trivalent
Begrivac®
15 ug of antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects between 18 and 70 years of age (inclusive)
* Any sex or ethnicity
* Outpatient or hospitalized subjects
* Confirmed diagnosis of chronic pulmonary and/or cardiac, and/or diabetes mellitus based on the investigator's assessment (subjects may present one or more of such conditions)
* Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
1. Hormone contraceptive (such as oral, injectable, transdermal patch, subcutaneous implant, cervical ring)
2. Barrier (condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) at each intercourse and during the whole intercourse
3. Intra-uterine device (IUD)
4. Monogamous relation with vasectomized partner (must have been vasectomized at least six months before the volunteer entered the study)
* Subjects capable of following all the study procedures and available for all visits scheduled to the investigation site
* Subjects capable of understanding the nature and risk of the study proposed and sign the consent form
* The study subjects may have other underlying chronic diseases that do not involve immunosuppression (e.g. osteoarticular diseases, stable, non-progressive, non-severe neurologic disorders without cognitive impairment, ophthalmologic diseases, hypothyroidism, etc.), but their symptoms/signs must be under control through medical follow-ups and drug therapy
For Healthy Subjects:
* Subjects between 18 and 70 years of age (inclusive)
* Any sex and ethnicity
* Subjects with good health as determined by medical history, physical evaluation, and investigator's clinical opinion
* Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
1. Hormone contraceptive (such as oral, injectable, transdermal patch, subcutaneous implant, cervical ring)
2. Barrier (condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) at each intercourse and during the whole sexual intercourse
3. Intra-uterine device (IUD)
4. Monogamous relation with vasectomized partner (must have been vasectomized for at least six months before the volunteer entered the study)
* Subjects capable of respecting all the study procedures and available for all the visits scheduled at the investigation site
* Subjects capable of understanding the nature and risk of the study proposed and sign the consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous laboratory confirmed diagnosis of an infection by the novel H1N1 virus
* Administration of other vaccine against the novel H1N1 virus within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Any recent vaccine given within the last 21 days (inclusive)
* History of allergic reaction to an influenza vaccine in the past, or a current or previous occurrence of allergy to egg or egg protein, kanamycin, and neomycin sulfate
* Acute febrile disease (vaccination may be delayed up to 3 days after the resolution of the symptoms)
* History of cancer, except for skin cancer, including Kaposi's Sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, and non-invasive malignancy related to HPV
* History of chronic hepatic or renal disease
* History of cognitive disorders
* History of progressive or severe neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Use of immunomodulatory therapy, including cyclosporin,interleukins, and interferons, within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin, hemotherapy, and/or plasma derivatives within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Life expectancy of at least 12 months
* Receipt of any investigational product within 12 months prior to inclusion in the study
For Healthy Subjects:
* Previous laboratory confirmed diagnosis of an infection by the new virus H1N1
* Receipt of another vaccine against the new virus H1N1 within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Any recent vaccine given within the last 21 days (inclusive)
* History of allergic reaction to influenza vaccine in the past, or a current or previous allergy to egg or egg protein, kanamycin, and neomycin sulfate
* Acute febrile disease (the vaccination may be delayed up to 3 days after symptoms resolution)
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin, hemotherapy, and/or plasma derivatives within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Receipt of any investigational product within 12 months prior to inclusion in the study
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chiltern Pesquisa Clinica Ltda
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro de Estudos de Pneumologia da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa em Geriatria e Gerontologia
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
ANZIC Influenza Investigators; Webb SA, Pettila V, Seppelt I, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Cooper DJ, Cretikos M, Davies AR, Finfer S, Harrigan PW, Hart GK, Howe B, Iredell JR, McArthur C, Mitchell I, Morrison S, Nichol AD, Paterson DL, Peake S, Richards B, Stephens D, Turner A, Yung M. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 12;361(20):1925-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908481. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Bridges CB, Katz JM, Levandowski RA, Cox NJ. Inactivated influenza vaccines. In. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA. Vaccines 5th ed. WB Saunders. Phila PA 2008; 291-309
Clark TW, Pareek M, Hoschler K, Dillon H, Nicholson KG, Groth N, Stephenson I. Trial of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):2424-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907650. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7.
Dominguez-Cherit G, Lapinsky SE, Macias AE, Pinto R, Espinosa-Perez L, de la Torre A, Poblano-Morales M, Baltazar-Torres JA, Bautista E, Martinez A, Martinez MA, Rivero E, Valdez R, Ruiz-Palacios G, Hernandez M, Stewart TE, Fowler RA. Critically Ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA. 2009 Nov 4;302(17):1880-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1536. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM, Schmitz AM, Benoit SR, Louie J, Sugerman DE, Druckenmiller JK, Ritger KA, Chugh R, Jasuja S, Deutscher M, Chen S, Walker JD, Duchin JS, Lett S, Soliva S, Wells EV, Swerdlow D, Uyeki TM, Fiore AE, Olsen SJ, Fry AM, Bridges CB, Finelli L; 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Hospitalizations Investigation Team. Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April-June 2009. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 12;361(20):1935-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906695. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R, Cook DJ, Marshall J, Lacroix J, Stelfox T, Bagshaw S, Choong K, Lamontagne F, Turgeon AF, Lapinsky S, Ahern SP, Smith O, Siddiqui F, Jouvet P, Khwaja K, McIntyre L, Menon K, Hutchison J, Hornstein D, Joffe A, Lauzier F, Singh J, Karachi T, Wiebe K, Olafson K, Ramsey C, Sharma S, Dodek P, Meade M, Hall R, Fowler RA; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group H1N1 Collaborative. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA. 2009 Nov 4;302(17):1872-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1496. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
Vaillant L, La Ruche G, Tarantola A, Barboza P; epidemic intelligence team at InVS. Epidemiology of fatal cases associated with pandemic H1N1 influenza 2009. Euro Surveill. 2009 Aug 20;14(33):19309. doi: 10.2807/ese.14.33.19309-en.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
V111_16TP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.