Evaluation of the Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT ID: NCT01029431
Last Updated: 2017-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-12-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT01233011
Evaluation of the Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT00885911
The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Unique and the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) in Pediatric Patients
NCT01314248
LMA Unique TM & the Self Pressurized Air-Q TM Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT01385761
Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Proseal
NCT01328405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
H0: Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with Air-Q® ILA= mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with PLMA.
H1: Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with Air-Q® ILA≠ mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with PLMA.
Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is used during pediatric anesthesia for routine and difficult airway management. The ideal pediatric LMA device would provide excellent sealing at low pressure; facilitate easy endotracheal intubation; and be available in pediatric sizes. Such a device would be an invaluable addition to difficult pediatric airway management plans and, by increasing the likelihood of quickly and effectively securing the difficult airway, and decreasing the risk of catastrophic hypoxemia, would increase perioperative safety for children. The Air-Q® ILA is a modified LMA device whose features encompass the characteristics of the ideal LMA. Our objective is to determine whether or not this new airway device is an improvement over the current standard of care.
Specific Objectives:
The objective of this study is to compare the Air-Q® ILA's performance to the current best option, the PLMA.
Methods:
Recruitment of subjects: With ethical and institutional review board approval, and with written parental informed consent, we will recruit children undergoing elective surgery. Children with ASA status IV-V, abnormal or contraindicated cervical spine flexion/extension/rotation, contraindication to LMA placement, or requiring emergency surgery will be excluded. All children will undergo intravenous induction of anesthesia, as per our routine institutional practice.
Administration of Air-Q® ILA: In phase 2, either a PLMA or an Air-Q® ILA will be inserted and assessed. The first LMA will then be removed and the other device inserted and assessed. The order of insertion will be determined by block randomization.
Data analysis: In phase 2, we will compare OLP values using paired t- tests. We will conduct appropriate statistical analysis of the data on the other assessment variables, which are all secondary outcome measures. Descriptive data will be presented as mean ± SD, median (range), counts (percentages or proportions) as appropriate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
All subjects will have both Air-Q ILA \& PLMA
AirQ Intubating Laryngeal Airway
After induction of anaesthesia in each child, either a PLMA or an Air-Q® ILA of the weight-appropriate size will be inserted \& the evaluation described below will be conducted. The first LMA will then be removed \& the other device inserted \& assessed. The order in which the LMA devices are inserted will be determined using block randomisation, with random block sizes, after recruitment \& before induction of anesthesia. The anesthesiologist will insert the LMAs using the manufacturer's recommended technique, \& inflate the cuff to the manufacturer's recommended intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Intracuff pressure will be measured with a digital pressure cuff monitor.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AirQ Intubating Laryngeal Airway
After induction of anaesthesia in each child, either a PLMA or an Air-Q® ILA of the weight-appropriate size will be inserted \& the evaluation described below will be conducted. The first LMA will then be removed \& the other device inserted \& assessed. The order in which the LMA devices are inserted will be determined using block randomisation, with random block sizes, after recruitment \& before induction of anesthesia. The anesthesiologist will insert the LMAs using the manufacturer's recommended technique, \& inflate the cuff to the manufacturer's recommended intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Intracuff pressure will be measured with a digital pressure cuff monitor.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Ideal body weight as determined from weight/height centile curves (\>3rd \& \<97th centiles).
3. Elective surgery
4. Appropriate subject and procedure for airway management by LMA sizes 1, 1.5, 2 or 2.5 (Weight 0-50 kg).
1. ASA status IV-V
2. Emergency surgery
3. Abnormal or contraindicated cervical spine flexion/extension/rotation
4. Contraindication to LMA placement
5. Aspiration risk; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
6. Clinically significant pulmonary disease
7. Coagulopathy
8. Distorted airway anatomy judged likely to compromise LMA placement
9. Allergy to any LMA components.
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Simon Whyte
Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Simon Whyte, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Stephan Malherbe, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of British Columbia
Andrew Morrison, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
British Columbia Children's Hospital, Department of Anesthesia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H08-02199
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.