Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) and Low-resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Analysis in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Patients

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study the Quantitative Electroencephalography and low resolution topographic analysis of chronic Post-traumatic stress disorder and normal subjects will be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is defined as a constellation of symptoms in response to a stressor, including re-experiencing a traumatic event, numbed responsiveness and symptoms of an increased level of arousal (APA 2000) . In recent years there were many attempts to connect the brain structure and function to symptoms in PTSD patients (Francati, Vermetten et al. 2007; Liberzon and Sripada 2008). One of the important technologies in this regard is the Electroencephalography (EEG) measurement.

The EEG is the reflection of the inner brain electrical changing dipole as it is measured on the scalp. It is measured by electrode that placed on the head according to the international distribution of electrodes called 10-20. The EEG recording that is the product of the measurement can be analyzed at least in three different levels: visual inspection of the raw EEG, quantities analysis of the EEG (QEEG) and based on the QEEG, calculating the electrical distribution of dipoles inside the brain that creates the EEG signal (Niedermeyer and Lopes da Silva 2005). Theoretically two EEG measurements could have the same visual EEG and/or QEEG patterns but the inner brain electrical dipole distribution could be very different. The mathematical solution to the calculation of the dipole distribution inside the brain, using the scalp EEG is based on "the inverse problem" concepts. One of the more common and precise method to solve the inverse problem regarding the EEG is called LORETA (low resolution topographic analysis) (Pascual-Marqui, Michel et al. 1994; Pascual-Marqui, Esslen et al. 2002). There are many brain image technologies aiming on mapping the connection between brain function and psychopathology. Each method caries with it both advantage and drawbacks. The use of the Electroencephalographic mapping technique is no different and it's main advantage - the temporal resolution is with opposition to the relatively lower spatial resolution. Modern signal processing tools and software like the LORETA start challenging this equation and in the last years some articles were published proving the possibilities of using EEG measurement to localized brain function with high spatial-resolution (Stern, Neufeld et al. 2009) .

The study will focus on the rest QEEG and rest LORETA analysis in PTSD patients.

Previous QEEG research found conflicting results regarding the spectral distribution of the EEG waves across the scalp.

Begic et al (Begic, Hotujac et al. 2001) compared 18 PTSD veterans to 20 controls. They found that PTSD patients had increased theta activity over central regions, and they had increased beta activity over frontal, central and occipital regions. No significant differences were noted between the PTSD and control group in both the delta and alpha activity. In this study all the patients were medication free for 2 weeks.

In another study the same group compared veterans with PTSD to veterans without PTSD. In this study the PTSD patients had decreased alpha power and increased beta power. No difference was noted on the theta band in this study (Jokic-Begic and Begic 2003).

In a recent study another group studied the hemispheric asymmetries among motor vehicle survivors with PTSD, with subsyndromal PTSD, survivors without PTSD and nonexposed healthy controls during rest (baseline) and in response to neutral, positive, negative, and trauma-related pictures. They focus on the alpha band. They found no group differences in EEG alpha activity during the baseline condition. In there study all the patients were without medication for 1 month (Rabe, Beauducel et al. 2006). Shankman et al compared the resting EEG of PTSD patients to "super- controls" in order to maximized the difference between this two groups. They found no statistical significant difference in any of the spectral band (Shankman, Silverstein et al. 2008).

The aim of this study is to calculate the QEEG difference and to do LORETA analysis in PTSD patients compared to controls.

In order to avoid statistical multiple compressing problems this study will focus on the theta band. There are at least two reasons for this: the first is that due to ethical issue we don't ask our patients to stop there psychotropic treatments therefore all of them are using SSRI antidepressants which could cause some alpha rhythms changes (Niedermeyer and Lopes da Silva 2005). Another reason is that the origin of the theta bend is supposed to be the in limbic system (Niedermeyer and Lopes da Silva 2005) that is long ago connected to PTSD symptoms (Francati, Vermetten et al. 2007).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

PTSD EEG QEEG LORETA

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PTSD veterans

18 PTSD veterans

No interventions assigned to this group

controls

20 controls

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 10 veterans suffering for PTSD according to the DSM-IV-TR for at least 2 years.
* The 10 age matching controls will be recruited from the Beer Sheva mental stuff.

Exclusion Criteria

* Without any neurological or head trauma.
* Without alcohol or substance abuse.
* No evidence of psychotic episode in there history.
* Stable doses of different specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) antidepressant for at least two months.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Doron Todder

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beer Sheva Mental Health Center

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BHC-4917

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id