Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Comparing Duloxetine Versus Placebo in Patients Taking a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) for Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis (NCT NCT01018680)
NCT ID: NCT01018680
Last Updated: 2012-10-05
Results Overview
The weekly mean 24-hour average pain score was calculated from the participant's daily 24-hour average pain ratings using an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores from 0 (indicating "no pain") to 10 (indicating "the worst possible pain"). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, treatment\*week, and baseline\*week.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
524 participants
Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
2012-10-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
260
|
264
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
199
|
189
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
61
|
75
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
23
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor Decision
|
6
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
8
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Entry Criteria Not Met
|
1
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
3
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study Comparing Duloxetine Versus Placebo in Patients Taking a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) for Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=260 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=264 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
Total
n=524 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
60.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.17 • n=5 Participants
|
61.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24 • n=7 Participants
|
60.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.22 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
299 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
225 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
206 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
218 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
424 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
260 participants
n=5 Participants
|
264 participants
n=7 Participants
|
524 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
90.78 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.49 • n=5 Participants
|
90.41 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.13 • n=7 Participants
|
90.59 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.80 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weekly 24-Hour Average Pain Rating
|
6.36 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41 • n=5 Participants
|
6.27 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41 • n=7 Participants
|
6.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory-Severity (BPI-S) Average Pain
|
6.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51 • n=5 Participants
|
6.09 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=7 Participants
|
6.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Illness (PGAI)
|
6.95 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.50 • n=5 Participants
|
6.93 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49 • n=7 Participants
|
6.94 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis Physical Function Score
|
37.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.39 • n=5 Participants
|
37.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.10 • n=7 Participants
|
37.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain
|
9.19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.92 • n=5 Participants
|
9.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88 • n=7 Participants
|
9.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.90 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline weekly mean 24-hour average pain value were included in the analysis.
The weekly mean 24-hour average pain score was calculated from the participant's daily 24-hour average pain ratings using an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores from 0 (indicating "no pain") to 10 (indicating "the worst possible pain"). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, treatment\*week, and baseline\*week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=255 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=259 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score at 8 Weeks
|
-1.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline PGI-S rating and at least 1 post-baseline PGI-I rating were included in the analysis.
A scale that measures the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value of Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S), treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, and treatment\*visit. The PGI-S measures participant's perception of severity of illness at the time of assessment. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (extremely ill).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=254 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=254 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 8 Weeks
|
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline WOMAC value were included in the analysis.
Self-administered questionnaire captures elements of pain, stiffness, and physical disability in participants with osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip. Index has 24 questions (5 on pain, 2 on stiffness, 17 on physical function). Each question uses a 5-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). Pain scores range: 0 to 20. Stiffness scores range: 0 to 8. Physical function scores range: 0 to 68. Higher scores=greater impairment. Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline value\*visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=258 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
WOMAC Physical Disability Score (n=253, 251)
|
-10.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
-15.09 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
WOMAC Pain Score
|
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
-4.41 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
WOMAC Stiffness Score
|
-1.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-1.88 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline night/worst pain value and at least 1 post-baseline weekly mean 24-hour night/worst pain value were included in the analysis.
Weekly mean 24-hour night pain and worst pain values are calculated from the participant's daily assessments of pain at night and worst pain during the previous 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores from 0 (indicating "no pain") to 10 (indicating "the worst possible pain"). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, treatment\*week, and baseline\*week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=253 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=259 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Night Pain and Worst Pain Scores at 8 Weeks
Night Pain Intensity
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Night Pain and Worst Pain Scores at 8 Weeks
Worst Pain Intensity
|
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline BPI-S/BPI-I value were included in the analysis.
Measures pain severity and pain interference with function. Severity scores: 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) on each question. Interference scores: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) on each question assessing interference of pain in past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Mean interference is the average across the 7 interference items. The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline\*visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=258 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Mood
|
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Walking Ability
|
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Normal Work
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Relations with Others (n=255, 258)
|
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Sleep
|
-2.01 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-2.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Enjoyment of Life
|
-1.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for Mean Interference Score
|
-1.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-2.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-S for Worst Pain
|
-1.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-S for Least Pain
|
-1.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-S for Average Pain
|
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-S for Pain Right Now
|
-2.03 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 Weeks
BPI-I for General Activity
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline CGI-S value were included in the analysis.
The CGI-S scale evaluates the severity of illness at the time of assessment. The scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). The CGI-S must be administered by a study physician in the presence of the participant or after having been in the presence of the participant. The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline\*visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=244 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=247 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) at 8 Weeks
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-1.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline PGAI value were included in the analysis.
The PGAI is a participant-rated measure of the severity of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee the participant has experienced in the past week as indicated on an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 10, where greater numbers reflect greater severity. The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline\*visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=219 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=214 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment of Illness (PGAI) at 8 Weeks
|
-1.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline BPOMS value were included in the analysis.
30-item BPOMS measures positive and negative aspects of mood states (item score: 0=not at all to 4=extremely). 5 negative factors: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, confusion-bewilderment; 1 positive factor: vigor-activity. Factor scores range: 0 to 20; high scores=negative mood (positive mood for vigor). Total score=sum of 5 negative factor scores minus vigor score; range: -20=least disturbed to 100=most disturbed. Least Squares Mean estimates adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline value\*visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=216 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Total Score
|
-4.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
-4.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Tension-Anxiety Score
|
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Depression-Dejection Score
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Anger-Hostility Score
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Vigor-Activity Score
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
0.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Fatigue-Inertia Score
|
-1.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 Weeks
BPOMS Confusion-Bewilderment Score
|
-0.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 10 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline weekly acetaminophen use value were included in the analysis.
The Least Squares (LS) Mean percentage estimates of participants using acetaminophen was determined during each week individually over the full 10-week treatment period based on participant's daily Yes/No assessments for the use of acetaminophen. The LS Mean estimates for the main effect of treatment (average weekly use) were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, and treatment\*week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=258 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=262 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Acetaminophen Weekly During the 10-Week Treatment Period
|
26 percentage of participants
Standard Error 2
|
22 percentage of participants
Standard Error 2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline OARSI response value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) based on values of each of the 3 components listed in the outcome measure description were included in the analysis.
OARSI response is composite Yes/No response assessed at 8 weeks based on decrease in 24-hour average pain ratings, range: 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"), improvement in functioning (using WOMAC physical function scores, range: 0 \[no difficulty\] to 68 \[extreme difficulty\]), and improvement in participant's impression of illness (using PGAI scores, range: 0 to 10; 10=greatest severity). OARSI responder=large response in pain or function components (50% relative and 20% absolute improvement), or moderate response (20% relative and 10% absolute improvement) in 2 of 3 components.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=259 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=263 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Response Criteria up to 8 Weeks
|
48.3 percentage of responders
|
69.6 percentage of responders
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis.
Response is a dichotomous outcome (Yes/No) indicating at least 30% (or 50%) reduction from baseline to endpoint for the weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain ratings. The weekly mean 24-hour average pain score was calculated from the participant's daily 24-hour average pain rating assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain").
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=255 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=259 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 30 Percent or 50 Percent Reduction in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score up to 8 Weeks
30% Response (LOCF) based on 24-Hour Average Pain
|
33.7 percentage of participants
|
53.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 30 Percent or 50 Percent Reduction in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score up to 8 Weeks
50% Response (LOCF) based on 24-Hour Average Pain
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Population: Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline BPI-S average pain value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis.
Response is a dichotomous outcome (Yes/No) indicating at least 30% (or 50%) reduction from baseline to endpoint for BPI-S average pain rating. The BPI-S self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the average pain experienced over the past 24 hours. The severity scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=258 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 30 Percent or 50 Percent Reduction in the Brief Pain Inventory-Severity (BPI-S) Average Pain Score up to 8 Weeks
30% Response (LOCF) based on BPI-S Average Pain
|
34.0 percentage of participants
|
58.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 30 Percent or 50 Percent Reduction in the Brief Pain Inventory-Severity (BPI-S) Average Pain Score up to 8 Weeks
50% Response (LOCF) based on BPI-S Average Pain
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
45.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 10 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=260 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=264 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Due to an Adverse Event During the 10-Week Treatment Period
|
8.8 percentage of participants
|
15.2 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeksPopulation: Number of participants with a normal baseline and at least 1 post-baseline abnormal HbA1C value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis.
Abnormal high HbA1c is defined as a post-baseline HbA1c \> 6.1% if baseline HbA1c ≤ 6.1% for lab samples obtained before November 17, 2010 and post-baseline HbA1c \> 6.4% if baseline HbA1c ≤ 6.4% for lab samples obtained November 17, 2010 and beyond.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=210 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=208 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal High Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) up to 10 Weeks
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeksPopulation: Participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline weight value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis.
Abnormal weight gain (potentially clinically significant \[PCS\] weight gain) is defined as weight gain at last visit ≥ 7% of the baseline weight. Abnormal weight loss (PCS weight loss) is defined as weight loss at last visit ≥ 7% of the baseline weight.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=258 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Weight Gain and Weight Loss up to 10 Weeks
PCS Weight Gain
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Weight Gain and Weight Loss up to 10 Weeks
PCS Weight Loss
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeksPopulation: Participants with a normal baseline and at least 1 post-baseline DBP and SBP value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis. Participants with a normal baseline value and a nonmissing endpoint value for the variable of interest were included in the analysis.
Abnormal DPB (diastolic hypertension) is defined as sitting DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg that is also ≥ 10 mm Hg increase from baseline that is observed at last visit if highest baseline DBP \< 90 mm Hg. Abnormal SBP (systolic hypertension) is defined as sitting SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg that is also ≥ 10 mm Hg increase from baseline that is observed at last visit if highest baseline SBP \< 140 mm Hg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=202 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=215 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) up to 10 Weeks
Diastolic Hypertension
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
4.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) up to 10 Weeks
Systolic Hypertension (N=170, 171)
|
4.7 percentage of participants
|
12.3 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeksPopulation: Participants with a normal baseline and at least 1 post-baseline pulse rate value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis.
Abnormal pulse rate (tachycardia) is defined as a sitting heart rate (HR) ≥ 100 beats per minute (bpm) that is also ≥ 10 bpm compared to baseline, at last visit if highest baseline HR \< 100 bpm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=257 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=264 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Pulse Rate up to 10 Weeks
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat (ITT) participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline REU value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) were included in the analysis.
REU captures information regarding the participant's work status and/or health care utilization. Investigators gather information from medical records, psychiatric history, and direct questioning of the participant and his or her family to complete the questionnaire. Responses to each item, comparing baseline to endpoint, are characterized as "Better," "Same," or "Worse." Better: an increase in time spent working/volunteering/holding a job, decrease in number of health care visits; Same: no change in time spent working/volunteering/holding a job, no change in number of health care visits; Worse: decrease in time spent working/volunteering/holding a job, increase in number of health care visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=260 Participants
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=264 Participants
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Group Visits-Better
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Group Visits-Same
|
99.6 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Group Visits-Worse
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Individual Visits-Better
|
2.4 percentage of participants
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Individual Visits-Same
|
96.7 percentage of participants
|
99.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Individual Visits-Worse
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
ER Visits for Psychiatric Illness-Better
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
ER Visits for Psychiatric Illness-Same
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
ER Visits for Psychiatric Illness-Worse
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
ER Visits for Non-psychiatric Illness-Better
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
3.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
ER Visits for Non-psychiatric Illness-Same
|
92.7 percentage of participants
|
95.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
ER Visits for Non-psychiatric Illness-Worse
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Visits to Other Physicians-Better
|
20.4 percentage of participants
|
26.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Visits to Other Physicians-Same
|
74.3 percentage of participants
|
69.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Outpatient Visits to Other Physicians-Worse
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
4.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Average Hours Worked for Pay per Week-Better
|
15.2 percentage of participants
|
18.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Average Hours Worked for Pay per Week-Same
|
64.3 percentage of participants
|
69.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Average Hours Worked for Pay per Week-Worse
|
20.5 percentage of participants
|
11.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
How Long Participant Had This Job-Better
|
25.2 percentage of participants
|
20.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
How Long Participant Had This Job-Same
|
65.8 percentage of participants
|
69.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
How Long Participant Had This Job-Worse
|
9.0 percentage of participants
|
10.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Average Hours of Volunteer Work per Week-Better
|
10.7 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Average Hours of Volunteer Work per Week-Same
|
67.9 percentage of participants
|
72.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Average Hours of Volunteer Work per Week-Worse
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Psychiatric Visits-Better
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Psychiatric Visits-Same
|
98.4 percentage of participants
|
99.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change of Better, Worse, or No Change in Health Outcomes as Measured by Resource Utilization (REU) up to 10 Weeks
Psychiatric Visits-Worse
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Duloxetine
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=260 participants at risk
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=264 participants at risk
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/260
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/264
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/264
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/260
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/260
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/264
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to central nervous system
|
0.00%
0/260
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
0.00%
0/264
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/260
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=260 participants at risk
Participants received placebo by mouth, once daily for 10 weeks.
|
Duloxetine
n=264 participants at risk
Participants initially received 30 milligrams (mg) duloxetine by mouth, once daily for 1 week, followed by 60 mg by mouth, once daily thereafter. At end of 3 weeks, participants with a weekly mean 24-hour average pain value ≥4 in week preceding their visit had their dose escalated up to 120 mg by mouth, once daily until Week 10.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.77%
2/260 • Number of events 2
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.9%
5/264 • Number of events 5
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.9%
5/264 • Number of events 6
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.77%
2/260 • Number of events 2
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 7
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
3.1%
8/260 • Number of events 8
|
8.7%
23/264 • Number of events 24
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.8%
10/260 • Number of events 11
|
6.8%
18/264 • Number of events 19
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
2.7%
7/260 • Number of events 7
|
9.5%
25/264 • Number of events 25
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
2.3%
6/264 • Number of events 6
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.6%
12/260 • Number of events 12
|
15.5%
41/264 • Number of events 43
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
4.2%
11/264 • Number of events 12
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
6.8%
18/264 • Number of events 19
|
|
General disorders
Feeling jittery
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 4
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
General disorders
Therapeutic response unexpected
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 5
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
0.00%
0/264
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
3.1%
8/260 • Number of events 8
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
5.7%
15/264 • Number of events 15
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
2.3%
6/264 • Number of events 7
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
0.00%
0/264
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.5%
4/260 • Number of events 4
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.7%
7/260 • Number of events 7
|
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 17
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.8%
10/260 • Number of events 10
|
6.1%
16/264 • Number of events 21
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
2.7%
7/260 • Number of events 7
|
5.3%
14/264 • Number of events 14
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal dreams
|
1.9%
5/260 • Number of events 5
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.9%
5/260 • Number of events 5
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
1.2%
3/260 • Number of events 3
|
4.9%
13/264 • Number of events 15
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.9%
5/264 • Number of events 5
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/260
|
2.3%
6/264 • Number of events 6
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine flow decreased
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.9%
5/264 • Number of events 5
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/260
|
2.3%
6/264 • Number of events 6
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.38%
1/260 • Number of events 1
|
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 10
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.77%
2/260 • Number of events 2
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
0.00%
0/260
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.77%
2/260 • Number of events 2
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3
|
Additional Information
Chief Medical Officer
Eli Lilly and Company
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60