Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Common Facial Acne (NCT NCT01017120)

NCT ID: NCT01017120

Last Updated: 2017-05-18

Results Overview

LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

742 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Results posted on

2017-05-18

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Overall Study
STARTED
373
369
Overall Study
COMPLETED
307
334
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
66
35

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
9
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
13
11
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
1
0
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
39
21
Overall Study
Pregnancy
1
1
Overall Study
Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria
1
0
Overall Study
Relocated Out of Town
0
2
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
0
Overall Study
Parent Unable to Provide Transportation
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Common Facial Acne

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Total
n=742 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
19.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=5 Participants
19.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=7 Participants
19.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
197 Participants
n=5 Participants
185 Participants
n=7 Participants
382 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
184 Participants
n=7 Participants
360 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
2 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
28 participants
n=5 Participants
21 participants
n=7 Participants
49 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
60 participants
n=5 Participants
57 participants
n=7 Participants
117 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
278 participants
n=5 Participants
280 participants
n=7 Participants
558 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
5 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
10 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set: all randomized participants who were dispensed study product. Calculation was based on the last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data, in which missing final values of the outcome variable are replaced by the last known value before the participant was lost to follow up.

LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
ILs
-17.8 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 11.81
-14.7 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 10.66
Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
NILs
-25.6 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 17.06
-18.2 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 15.21
Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
TLs
-43.4 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 24.27
-32.9 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 21.99

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12
120 participants
67 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
103 participants
49 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set. The LOCF imputation method was used for missing data.

LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Percent change from Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and12 was calculated as the (Week 2/4/8/12 value minus the baseline value divided by baseline value) x 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
ILs, Week 2
-18.2 percentage change
Standard Deviation 26.12
-17.4 percentage change
Standard Deviation 26.16
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
ILs, Week 12
-54.5 percentage change
Standard Deviation 32.79
-45.3 percentage change
Standard Deviation 30.72
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NILs, Week 2
-23.7 percentage change
Standard Deviation 25.82
-17.3 percentage change
Standard Deviation 25.03
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NILs, Week 8
-50.6 percentage change
Standard Deviation 27.35
-36.6 percentage change
Standard Deviation 27.81
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NILs, Week 12
-56.7 percentage change
Standard Deviation 28.84
-41.2 percentage change
Standard Deviation 31.09
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
TLs, Week 2
-21.6 percentage change
Standard Deviation 20.44
-17.1 percentage change
Standard Deviation 20.38
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
ILs, Week 4
-32.9 percentage change
Standard Deviation 30.18
-31.4 percentage change
Standard Deviation 29.13
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
ILs, Week 8
-48.1 percentage change
Standard Deviation 30.99
-41.0 percentage change
Standard Deviation 28.77
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NILs, Week 4
-39.2 percentage change
Standard Deviation 27.30
-27.3 percentage change
Standard Deviation 29.28
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
TLs, Week 4
-36.8 percentage change
Standard Deviation 23.43
-28.9 percentage change
Standard Deviation 23.35
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
TLs, Week 8
-49.7 percentage change
Standard Deviation 24.65
-38.4 percentage change
Standard Deviation 24.33
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
TLs, Week 12
-56.0 percentage change
Standard Deviation 26.76
-42.6 percentage change
Standard Deviation 26.80

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data.

LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Calculation was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NILs, Week 4
-17.3 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 13.73
-11.8 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 14.37
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
TLs, Week 4
-28.0 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 18.85
-22.0 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 19.39
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
ILs, Week 2
-5.9 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 8.87
-5.6 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 8.80
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
ILs, Week 4
-10.7 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 10.41
-10.2 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 9.95
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
ILs, Week 8
-15.7 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 11.06
-13.3 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 9.77
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NILs, Week 2
-10.7 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 13.37
-7.7 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 12.50
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NILs, Week 8
-22.6 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 15.42
-16.5 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 14.26
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
TLs, Week 2
-16.6 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 17.15
-13.3 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 17.50
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
TLs, Week 8
-38.3 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 21.49
-29.7 lesion counts
Standard Deviation 20.42

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set: only those participants with a \>=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC were evaluated.

Time to a 50 percent reduction in TLC (sum of ILs and NILs) was the time difference between Baseline and the time to 50 percent reduction in LC. Participants who did not have a \>=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC during the study were censored at their last visit date.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=265 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=194 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)
57 days
Interval 56.0 to 57.0
85 days
Interval 65.0 to 85.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Population: ITT Analysis Set

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With a Minimum 2 G Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 2
8 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With a Minimum 2 G Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 4
33 participants
16 participants
Number of Participants With a Minimum 2 G Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 8
69 participants
35 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 4
26 participants
12 participants
Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 8
56 participants
26 participants
Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 2
5 participants
2 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

An SGA of the facial skin, excluding the scalp, was performed by participants using a rating scale of 0 to 4: 0=face is basically free of acne, with only an occasional blackhead (Bh) and/or whitehead (Wh); 1=face has several Bhs and/or Whs and small pimples (P), but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts (DSBCs); 2=face has several to many Bhs and/or Whs and small- to medium-sized P, and may have one DSBC; 3=face has many Bhs and/or Whs, many medium- to large-sized P, and perhaps a few DSBCs; 4=face has Bhs and/or Whs, and several to many medium- to large-sized Ps and DSBCs dominate.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
83 participants
93 participants
Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
136 participants
114 participants
Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
171 participants
125 participants
Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
213 participants
153 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
5 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
26 participants
12 participants
Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
56 participants
26 participants
Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
103 participants
49 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

A papule is a circumscribed, solid elevation of the skin with no visible fluid. Change from basline in papule count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the papule count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the papule count at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
-4.3 papule count
Standard Deviation 7.23
-4.3 papule count
Standard Deviation 8.28
Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
-8.3 papule count
Standard Deviation 8.76
-7.8 papule count
Standard Deviation 9.27
Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
-12.0 papule count
Standard Deviation 9.55
-10.4 papule count
Standard Deviation 9.13
Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
-13.5 papule count
Standard Deviation 10.06
-11.5 papule count
Standard Deviation 10.00

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

A pustule is a small elevation of the skin containing cloudy or purulent material usually consisting of necrotic inflammatory cells. Change from basline in pustule count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the pustule count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the pustule count at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
-1.5 pustule count
Standard Deviation 5.70
-1.3 pustule count
Standard Deviation 4.46
Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
-2.4 pustule count
Standard Deviation 6.21
-2.4 pustule count
Standard Deviation 5.04
Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
-3.7 pustule count
Standard Deviation 6.08
-2.9 pustule count
Standard Deviation 5.14
Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
-4.2 pustule count
Standard Deviation 6.42
-3.2 pustule count
Standard Deviation 5.68

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

A nodule is a slightly elevated lesion on or in the skin. Change from basline in nodule count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the nodule count at Week 2/4/8/12 value (s) minus the nodule count at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
-0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.35
0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.72
Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
-0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.40
0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.80
Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
-0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.40
0.1 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.83
Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
-0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.35
0.0 nodule count
Standard Deviation 0.78

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

An open comedone is a yellow or blackish bump or plug on the skin. Change from Baseline in open comedone count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the open comedone count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the open comedone count at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
-8.4 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 10.90
-6.9 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 9.56
Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
-3.5 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 8.49
-3.1 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 8.20
Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
-5.8 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 9.19
-4.2 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 9.06
Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
-7.3 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 10.13
-5.8 open comedone count
Standard Deviation 9.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set

A closed comedone is a whitehead. Change from basline in closed comedone count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the closed comedone count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the closed comedone count at Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
-7.3 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 10.84
-4.5 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 10.52
Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
-11.5 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 12.56
-7.6 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 11.55
Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
-15.3 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 14.10
-10.7 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 11.98
Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
-17.2 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 14.66
-11.4 closed comedone count
Standard Deviation 13.96

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set: only those participants 17 years of age or older and whose DLQI scores were calculated at baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, or 12 were evaluated for change in DLQI score at respective week.

The DLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-5=small effect on the participant's life; 6-10=moderate effect on the participant's life; 11-20=very large effect on the participant's life; 21-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the DLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=175 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=178 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
Week 4, n=170, 184
-2.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.80
-2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
Week 12, n=162, 176
-3.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.33
-3.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.98
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
Week 8, n=163, 176
-2.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
-3.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.64
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
Week 2, n=175, 178
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.28
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.68

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Week 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Analysis Set: only those participants 16 years of age or younger and whose CDLQI scores were calculated at Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, or 12 were evaluated for change in DLQI score at respective week.

The CDLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The CDLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6=small effect on the participant's life; 7-12=moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18=very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the CDLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=153 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=163 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
Week 2, n=153, 163
1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.01
-1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
Week 4, n=143, 158
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.30
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.33
Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
Week 8, n=137, 158
-1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.19
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.13
Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
Week 12, n=137, 153
-1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.06
-2.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Population: All Randomized Participants: all participants who were randomized in the study

Erythema is a skin condition characterized by redness or rash. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no redness); G1=slight (faint red or pink coloration, barely perceptible); G2=mild (light red or pink coloration); G3=moderate (medium red coloration); G4=severe (beet red coloration). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of erythema reported at any time during treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G4
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G0
175 participants
218 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G0
247 participants
234 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G1
65 participants
75 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G2
21 participants
20 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G3
40 participants
40 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G4
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, Missing G
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Maximum During Treatment (MDT), G0
76 participants
141 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G1
117 participants
132 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G2
111 participants
51 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G3
56 participants
37 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, Missing G
11 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G1
93 participants
73 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G2
30 participants
21 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G3
9 participants
19 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G4
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, Missing G
66 participants
38 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Population: All Randomized Participants

Dryness=skin epidermis that lacks moisture/sebum. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4. G0=absent (none); G1=slight (barely perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G2=mild (easily perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G3=moderate (easily noted dryness and flakes but no fissure formation); G4=severe (easily noted dryness with flakes and fissure formation). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of dryness reported at any time during treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G4
5 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, Missing G
11 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G3
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G0
316 participants
312 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G1
39 participants
43 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G2
13 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G3
5 participants
6 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G4
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, Missing G
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G0
73 participants
193 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G1
136 participants
124 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G2
87 participants
36 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G3
61 participants
7 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G0
219 participants
294 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G1
73 participants
35 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G2
14 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G4
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, Missing G
66 participants
38 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Population: All Randomized Participants

Peeling skin: damage to and loss of the upper layer of skin (epidermis). Local tolerability assessments for peeling were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no peeling); G1=slight (mild localized peeling); G2=mild (mild and diffuse peeling); G3=moderate (moderate and diffuse peeling); G4=severe (moderate to prominent, dense peeling). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of peeling reported at any time during treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G4
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, Missing G
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G0
108 participants
255 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G1
152 participants
85 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G2
69 participants
18 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G3
28 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, G4
5 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
MDT, Missing G
11 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G0
251 participants
313 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G2
7 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G3
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G4
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, Missing G
66 participants
38 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G1
22 participants
18 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G2
7 participants
6 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G3
2 participants
6 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Week 12, G1
48 participants
17 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Baseline, G0
342 participants
339 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Population: All Randomized Participants

Itching is a sensation that causes the desire or reflex to scratch. Local tolerability assessments for itching were performed by the participant at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G3. G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of itching reported at any time during treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G0
205 participants
209 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G1
133 participants
131 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G3
4 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, Missing G
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G0
57 participants
145 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G1
169 participants
155 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G2
96 participants
51 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G3
39 participants
10 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, Missing G
12 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G0
176 participants
224 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G3
4 participants
6 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, Missing G
66 participants
38 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G2
31 participants
27 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G1
105 participants
88 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G2
22 participants
13 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Population: All Randomized Participants

Burning/stinging is a pain and burning sensation. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the participant at each study visit based on severity as G0 to G3: G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of burning/stinging reported at any time during treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 Participants
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 Participants
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G0
299 participants
290 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G1
60 participants
62 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G2
12 participants
16 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, G3
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Baseline, Missing G
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G0
57 participants
109 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G1
169 participants
181 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G3
104 participants
16 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, Missing G
12 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G0
168 participants
223 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G1
97 participants
86 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G3
8 participants
7 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, Missing G
66 participants
38 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
MDT, G2
105 participants
55 participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Week 12, G2
34 participants
15 participants

Adverse Events

Tazarotene Foam

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 69 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Vehicle Foam

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 participants at risk
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 participants at risk
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
0.27%
1/373
0.00%
0/369

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Tazarotene Foam
n=373 participants at risk
Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Vehicle Foam
n=369 participants at risk
The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
General disorders
Application site dryness
7.5%
28/373
1.6%
6/369
General disorders
Application Site Irritation
11.0%
41/373
1.1%
4/369

Additional Information

GSK Response Center

GlaxoSmithKline

Phone: 866-435-7343

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER