Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate Participants Satisfaction, Quality of Life and Effectiveness of Flexible-Dose of Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) in Participants With Schizophrenia, Previously Treated With Risperidone (NCT NCT01010776)
NCT ID: NCT01010776
Last Updated: 2013-11-20
Results Overview
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
223 participants
Baseline and Week 26
2013-11-20
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER)
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of main phase and for additional 26 weeks of Extension Phase to participants who continued with Extension Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Main Phase
STARTED
|
223
|
|
Main Phase
Treated
|
218
|
|
Main Phase
COMPLETED
|
174
|
|
Main Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
49
|
|
In-Between Main Phase & Extension Phase
STARTED
|
174
|
|
In-Between Main Phase & Extension Phase
COMPLETED
|
159
|
|
In-Between Main Phase & Extension Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
|
Extension Phase
STARTED
|
159
|
|
Extension Phase
COMPLETED
|
156
|
|
Extension Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER)
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of main phase and for additional 26 weeks of Extension Phase to participants who continued with Extension Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Main Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
14
|
|
Main Phase
Lack of Efficacy
|
8
|
|
Main Phase
Adverse Event
|
7
|
|
Main Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
|
Main Phase
Non-compliance to study medication
|
5
|
|
Main Phase
Selection failure
|
2
|
|
Main Phase
Inform consent withdrawal
|
1
|
|
Main Phase
Other
|
1
|
|
Main Phase
Did not received study medication
|
5
|
|
In-Between Main Phase & Extension Phase
Extension phase was optional
|
15
|
|
Extension Phase
Other
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate Participants Satisfaction, Quality of Life and Effectiveness of Flexible-Dose of Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) in Participants With Schizophrenia, Previously Treated With Risperidone
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Paliperidone ER - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
n=218 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of main phase and for additional 26 weeks of Extension Phase to participants who continued with Extension Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
37.87 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.01 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-21 years
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
22-29 years
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
30-39 years
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
40-49 years
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
50-60 years
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
61-69 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
139 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mulatto
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Brown
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
|
94.49 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.38 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score
Positive PANSS Subscale Score
|
27.37 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.48 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score
Negative PANSS Subscale Score
|
19.76 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale Score
|
44.39 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
|
6.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26Population: The intent-to-treat for effectiveness (ITTe) population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used.
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=213 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26 - Main Phase
|
-22.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.1 • Interval -25.6 to -20.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. LOCF method was used.
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=159 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline
|
93.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 52
|
-26.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5 • Interval -29.2 to -23.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. LOCF method was used.
Participants with response in PANSS total score was defined as participants with greater than or equal to 20 percent reduction in PANSS total score from Baseline. The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=213 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Response in PANSS Total Score - Main Phase
|
60.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.2 to 66.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. LOCF method was used.
Participants with response in PANSS total score was defined as participants with greater than or equal to 20 percent reduction in PANSS total score from Baseline. The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=159 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Response in PANSS Total Score - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
|
71.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 63.4 to 78.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13 and 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The PANSS positive subscale assesses 7 positive-symptoms of schizophrenia. Positive symptoms refer to an excess or distortion of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, with a range of 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS negative subscale assesses seven negative-symptoms of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms represent a diminution or loss of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, with a range of 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=203 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 4: PANSS positive subscale (n=201)
|
-3.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8 • Interval -24.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 4: PANSS negative subscale (n=201)
|
-3.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8 • Interval -24.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 8: PANSS positive subscale (n=191)
|
-5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8 • Interval -25.0 to 20.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 8: PANSS negative subscale (n=191)
|
-5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8 • Interval -25.0 to 20.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 13: PANSS positive subscale (n=182)
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8 • Interval -25.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 13: PANSS negative subscale (n=182)
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8 • Interval -25.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 26: PANSS positive subscale (n=203)
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2 • Interval -25.0 to 14.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 26: PANSS negative subscale (n=203)
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2 • Interval -25.0 to 14.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The PANSS Positive Subscale assesses 7 positive-symptoms of schizophrenia. Positive symptoms refer to an excess or distortion of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, with a range of 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS Negative Subscale assesses seven negative-symptoms of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms represent a diminution or loss of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, with a range of 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=159 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: PANSS positive subscale (n=159)
|
26.65 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.20 • Interval 6.2 to
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: PANSS negative subscale (n=159)
|
19.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.86 • Interval 5.86 to
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 4: PANSS positive subscale (n=159)
|
-3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4 • Interval -14.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 4: PANSS negative subscale (n=159)
|
-3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4 • Interval -14.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 8: PANSS positive subscale (n=159)
|
-5.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.1 • Interval -18.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 8: PANSS negative subscale (n=159)
|
-5.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.1 • Interval -18.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 13: PANSS positive subscale (n=159)
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7 • Interval -18.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 13: PANSS negative subscale (n=159)
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7 • Interval -18.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 26: PANSS positive subscale (n=159)
|
-6.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5 • Interval -20.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 26: PANSS negative subscale (n=159)
|
-6.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5 • Interval -20.0 to 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 39: PANSS positive subcale (n=152)
|
-7.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9 • Interval -25.0 to 4.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 39: PANSS negative subscale (n=152)
|
-7.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9 • Interval -25.0 to 4.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 52: PANSS positive subscale (n=154)
|
-7.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1 • Interval -25.0 to 10.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative PANSS Subscales Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 52: PANSS negative subscale (n=154)
|
-7.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1 • Interval -25.0 to 10.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13 and 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The PSP scale evaluates the dysfunction degree exhibited by the participants, regarding 4 behavioral domains: useful social activities, personal and social relations, self-care and agitated and aggressive behavior. Each domain were assessed on a 6-point scale (0=absent to 5=very severe). A transformed score from 1 to 100 is generated from the raw score based on the clinical interpretation of the scores generated in the 4 areas of functioning, with a higher transformed score indicating better function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=204 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 4 (n=201)
|
5.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 8 (n=191)
|
8.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 13 (n=182)
|
9.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 26 (n=204)
|
10.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The PSP scale evaluates the dysfunction degree exhibited by the participants, regarding 4 behavioral domains: useful social activities, personal and social relations, self-care and agitated and aggressive behavior. Each domain were assessed on a 6-point scale (0=absent to 5=very severe). A transformed score from 1 to 100 is generated from the raw score based on the clinical interpretation of the scores generated in the 4 areas of functioning, with a higher transformed score indicating better function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=159 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline (n=159)
|
45.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 4 (n=159)
|
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 8 (n=159)
|
9.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 13 (n=159)
|
9.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 26 (n=159)
|
12.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 39 (n=151)
|
12.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSP Scale Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 52 (n=155)
|
14.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13 and 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The PSQI evaluates sleep behavior by means of 7 components: sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, usual sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, use of sleep medication and daytime dysfunction. The sum of the 7 component scores produces a global score of subjective sleep quality that varies from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=198 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Baseline (n=198)
|
6.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 4 (n=174)
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 8 (n=162)
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 13 (n=156)
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 26 (n=174)
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The PSQI evaluates sleep behavior by means of 7 components: sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, usual sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, use of sleep medication and daytime dysfunction. The sum of the 7 component scores produces a global score of subjective sleep quality that varies from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=148 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline (n=148)
|
6.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 4 (n=140)
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 8 (n=136)
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 13 (137)
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 26 (n=135)
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 39 (n=133)
|
-1.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
|
Change From Baseline PSQI Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 52 (n=133)
|
-1.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13 and 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The CGI-S rating scale is a 7-point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant.The categories included in the scale are normal, without any disease, borderline, slightly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill and extremely ill. A rating of 1="Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 ="Among the most extremely ill participants". Higher scores indicate worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=213 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Borderline (n=213)
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Slightly ill (n=213)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Moderately ill (n=213)
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Markedly ill (n=213)
|
114 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Severely ill (n=213)
|
40 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Extremely ill (n=213)
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 4: Borderline (n=201)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 4: Slightly ill (n=201)
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 4: Moderately ill (n=201)
|
87 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 4: Markedly ill (n=201)
|
61 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 4: Severely ill (n=201)
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 8: Borderline (n=191)
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 8: Slightly ill (n=191)
|
35 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 8: Moderately ill (n=191)
|
80 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 8: Markedly ill (n=191)
|
56 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 8: Severely ill (n=191)
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 8: extremely ill (n=191)
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 13: Normal, without any disease (n=182)
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 13: Borderline (n=182)
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 13: Slightly ill (n=182)
|
41 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 13: Moderately ill (n=182)
|
73 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 13: Markedly ill (n=182)
|
47 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 13: Severly ill (n=182)
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Normal without any disease (n=204)
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Borderline (n=204)
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Slightly ill (n=204)
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Moderately ill (n=204)
|
70 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Markedely ill (n=204)
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Severely ill (n=204)
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 39 and 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
The CGI-S rating scale is a 7-point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant.The categories included in the scale are normal, without any disease, borderline, slightly ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill and extremely ill. A rating of 1="Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 ="Among the most extremely ill participants". Higher scores indicate worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=155 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 39: Normal without any disease (n=152)
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 39: Borderline (n=152)
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 39: Slightly ill (n=152)
|
41 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 39: Moderately ill (n=152)
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 39: Markedely ill (n=152)
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 39: Severely ill (n=152)
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 52: Borderline (n=155)
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 52: Slightly ill (n=155)
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 52: Moderately ill (n=155)
|
58 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 52: Markedely ill (n=155)
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score - Extension Phase
Week 52: Severely ill (n=155)
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13 and 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
Participant's response regarding satisfaction with the treatment were recorded. A 5-point evaluation scale was used to evaluate participant satisfaction: very good, good, moderate, bad and very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=213 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Baseline: Very good (n=213)
|
11.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Baseline: Good (n=213)
|
38.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Baseline: Moderate (n=213)
|
34.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Baseline: Bad (n=213)
|
12.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Baseline: Very bad (n=213)
|
2.8 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 4: Very good (n=200)
|
29.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 4: Good (n=200)
|
52.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 4: Moderate (n=200)
|
16.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 4: Bad (n=200)
|
1.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 4: Very bad (n=200)
|
0.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 8: Very good (n=190)
|
33.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 8: Good (n=190)
|
48.9 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 8: Moderate (n=190)
|
13.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 8: Bad (n=190)
|
3.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 13: Very good (n=182)
|
37.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 13: Good (n=182)
|
46.2 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 13: Moderate (n=182)
|
12.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 13: Bad (n=182)
|
3.8 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 13: Very bad (n=182)
|
0.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 26: Very good (n=204)
|
36.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 26: Good (n=204)
|
46.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 26: Moderate (n=204)
|
10.8 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 26: Bad (n=204)
|
4.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction - Main Phase
Week 26: Very bad (n=204)
|
2.5 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
Participant's response regarding satisfaction with the treatment were recorded. A 5-point evaluation scale was used to evaluate participant satisfaction: very good, good, moderate, bad and very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=159 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Very good (n=159)
|
13.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Good (n=159)
|
40.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Moderate (n=159)
|
32.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Bad (n=159)
|
11.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Very bad (n=159)
|
2.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 4: Very good (n=159)
|
31.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 4: Good (n=159)
|
54.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 4: Moderate (n=159)
|
13.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 4: Very bad (n=159)
|
0.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 8: Very good (n=159)
|
37.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 8: Moderate (n=159)
|
11.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 8: Bad (n=159)
|
3.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 13: Very good (n=159)
|
39.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 13: Good (n=159)
|
46.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 13: Moderate (n=159)
|
10.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 13: Bad (n=159)
|
3.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 13: Very bad (n=159)
|
0.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 26: Very good (n=159)
|
41.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 26: Good (n=159)
|
50.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 26: Moderate (n=159)
|
6.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 26: Very bad (n=159)
|
0.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 39: Very good (n=152)
|
38.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 39: Good (n=152)
|
51.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 39: Moderate (n=152)
|
7.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 39: Bad (n=152)
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 39: Very bad (n=152)
|
0.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 52: Very good (n=155)
|
41.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 52: Good (n=155)
|
43.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 52: Moderate (n=155)
|
12.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction-Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 52: Bad (n=155)
|
2.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
The SF-36 is designed to assess the health status of participants. The SF-36 includes 1 multi-item scale measuring physical health component and mental health component. Physical health component includes physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, pain and general health. Mental health component includes role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being and social functioning. Each item is scored on a 0-100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100, respectively. All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. The score for a component (physical or mental) is an average of the individual item scores. Each component is scored on a scale of 1 to 100, where 100=highest level of functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=190 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Physical component summary
|
47.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase
Baseline: Mental component summary
|
35.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Physical component summary
|
48.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase
Week 26: Mental component summary
|
38.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52Population: The ITTe population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 post-baseline effectiveness measurement. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
The SF-36 is designed to assess the health status of participants. The SF-36 includes 1 multi-item scale measuring physical health component and mental health component. Physical health component includes physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, pain and general health. Mental health component includes role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being and social functioning. Each item is scored on a 0-100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100, respectively. All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. The score for a component (physical or mental) is an average of the individual item scores. Each component is scored on a scale of 1 to 100, where 100=highest level of functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=150 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Physical component summary
|
48.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline: Mental component summary
|
35.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 52: Physical component summary
|
48.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Week 52: Mental component summary
|
38.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13 and 26Population: The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least one dose of study medication and provided any post-baseline information. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
An ESRS scale is used to assess the extrapyramidal symptoms attributable to antipsychotics. It consists of 8 items to assess individual symptoms and each item is assessed from 0 (none, normal) to 4 (severe). The total score is the sum of the 8 item scores, for a total range of 0 (normal) to 32 (severe). The items for the assessment of individual symptoms are classified into 4 categories of parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonia and dyskinesia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=215 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Extrapyradimal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Baseline (n=215)
|
1.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Extrapyradimal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 4 (n=201)
|
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Extrapyradimal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 8 (n=189)
|
-0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Extrapyradimal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 13 (n=182)
|
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Extrapyradimal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13 and 26 - Main Phase
Change at Week 26 (n=201)
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52Population: The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here 'N' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
An ESRS scale is used to assess the extrapyramidal symptoms attributable to antipsychotics. It consists of 8 items to assess individual symptoms and each item is assessed from 0 (none, normal) to 4 (severe). The total score is the sum of the 8 item scores, for a total range of 0 (normal) to 32 (severe). The items for the assessment of individual symptoms are classified into 4 categories of parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonia and dyskinesia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) - Main Phase
n=159 Participants
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Baseline (n=159)
|
1.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 4 (n=159)
|
-0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 8 (n=159)
|
-0.49 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 13 (n=159)
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 26 (n=158)
|
-0.77 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 39 (n=151)
|
-0.81 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in ESRS Total Score at Week 4, 8, 13, 26, 39 and 52 - Main Phase Plus Extension Phase
Change at Week 52 (n=154)
|
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
Adverse Events
Paliperidone ER - Main Phase
Paliperidone ER - Extension Phase
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Paliperidone ER - Main Phase
n=215 participants at risk
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
Paliperidone ER - Extension Phase
n=159 participants at risk
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase and for additional 26 weeks of Extension Phase to participants who continued with Extension Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychomotor agitation
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder NOS
|
2.3%
5/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia NOS
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Somatoform disorder
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum deviation
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cholecystectomy
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy NOS
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Paliperidone ER - Main Phase
n=215 participants at risk
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
Paliperidone ER - Extension Phase
n=159 participants at risk
Paliperidone ER tablets in the flexible dose ranging from 3 to 12 milligram (mg) was administered orally once daily for 26 weeks of Main Phase and for additional 26 weeks of Extension Phase to participants who continued with Extension Phase. Dosage was adjusted as per the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
14.9%
32/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
8.8%
14/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
10.7%
23/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
2.5%
4/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
3.7%
8/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
4.4%
7/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
5.6%
12/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder NOS
|
3.3%
7/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.3%
2/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia NOS
|
1.9%
4/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychomotor retardation
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nervousness
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Aggression
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Logorrhea
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Obsessive thoughts
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Impulsive behavior NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hostility
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination NOS
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressive symptom
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychomotor agitation
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nightmare
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, auditory
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
6.0%
13/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
2.5%
4/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.0%
13/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
2.5%
4/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Akathisia
|
3.7%
8/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
3.1%
5/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Psychomotor hyperactivity
|
3.7%
8/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
2.8%
6/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parkinsonism
|
2.8%
6/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.8%
6/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dystonia
|
1.9%
4/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Extrapyramidal disorder
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphonia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ageusia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypokinesia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Grand mal convulsion
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Repetitive speech
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
10.7%
23/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
12.6%
20/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
2.3%
5/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
3.1%
5/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.3%
2/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Investigations
Blood prolactin increased
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.3%
2/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.3%
5/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting NOS
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary hypersecretion
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis NOS
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aptyalism
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidemia
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.3%
2/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus NOS
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.3%
2/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Appetite decreased NOS
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Appetite increased NOS
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridemia
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia NOS
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid retention
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Pain NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling abnormal
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction NOS
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.3%
2/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ejaculation failure
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast discharge
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension NOS
|
1.9%
4/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.9%
3/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Pallor
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected sebaceous cyst
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis NOS
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Breast abscess
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle rigidity
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Skin lesion NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Acne NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Snoring
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum deviation
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization
|
1.4%
3/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cholecystectomy
|
0.00%
0/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.63%
1/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye movement disorder NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Mycosis fungoides NOS
|
0.47%
1/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
0.00%
0/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Galactorrhea
|
0.93%
2/215 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
1.9%
3/159 • Baseline up to Week 52
The safety analysis population included all the participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided 1 post-baseline information. Here, 215 and 159 participants were inculded in safety analysis set for main phase and extension phase, respectively.
|
Additional Information
Medical Group Manager
Jan-Cil Brazil
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the Sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The Sponsor can require changes to the communication and can extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER