Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam for Participants With Active Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Proctitis or Proctosigmoiditis (NCT NCT01008410)
NCT ID: NCT01008410
Last Updated: 2019-08-14
Results Overview
Remission was a combined assessment of clinical and endoscopic variables, defined as an endoscopy score of less than or equal to (\<=) 1, a rectal bleeding score of 0, and an improvement or no change from baseline in stool frequency subscales of the Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) at the end of 6 weeks of treatment. MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment (PGA) and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Stool frequency MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Endoscopy MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal or inactive disease and 3 indicated severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
265 participants
Week 6
2019-08-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Budesonide
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis (UP) or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis (UPS), received 2 milligrams (mg)/25 milliliter (mL) of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
133
|
132
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
|
133
|
132
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
108
|
116
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
25
|
16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Budesonide
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis (UP) or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis (UPS), received 2 milligrams (mg)/25 milliliter (mL) of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
13
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Noncompliance
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Low Cortisol
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Met Exclusion Criterion
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam for Participants With Active Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Proctitis or Proctosigmoiditis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate (UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Total
n=265 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94 • n=5 Participants
|
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.24 • n=7 Participants
|
42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.60 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
223 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
238 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.
Remission was a combined assessment of clinical and endoscopic variables, defined as an endoscopy score of less than or equal to (\<=) 1, a rectal bleeding score of 0, and an improvement or no change from baseline in stool frequency subscales of the Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) at the end of 6 weeks of treatment. MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment (PGA) and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Stool frequency MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Endoscopy MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal or inactive disease and 3 indicated severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission
|
38.3 percentage of participants
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices:stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rectal Bleeding MMDAI Subscale Score of 0 at End of Week 6
|
46.6 percentage of participants
|
28.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Percentage of participants who were rectal bleeding responder at scheduled assessments were reported. Rectal bleeding responders were defined as those participants who achieved a rectal bleeding MMDAI subscale score of 0 during the treatment period. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Scheduled Assessments With Rectal Bleeding Responder Classification
Responder at 1 Assessment
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
13.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Number of Scheduled Assessments With Rectal Bleeding Responder Classification
Responder at 2 Assessment
|
18.8 percentage of participants
|
13.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Number of Scheduled Assessments With Rectal Bleeding Responder Classification
Responder at 3 Assessment
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
10.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Number of Scheduled Assessments With Rectal Bleeding Responder Classification
Responder at 4 Assessment
|
6.0 percentage of participants
|
1.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Endoscopy subscale ranged from 0-3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Percentage of participants with normal or mild disease have been presented in this outcome measure. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopy MMDAI Subscale Score of 0 or 1 at End of Week 6
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
43.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Bowel frequency (BF) subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal disease and 3 indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 for Rectal Bleeding Subscale and a Combined Score of <=2 for Bowel Frequency and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) in the MMDAI Subscales at End of Week 6
|
41.4 percentage of participants
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Physician global assessment (PGA) subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MMDAI Total Score of <= 3 With Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points of Improvement From Baseline at the End of Week 6
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
30.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern), 2 = moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Endoscopy Subscale Score at End of Week 6
|
57.1 percentage of participants
|
47.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Rectal Bleeding Subscale Score at End of Week 6
|
70.7 percentage of participants
|
53.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=3 Point Improvement From Baseline in the MMDAI Total Score Including Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Rectal Bleeding Subscale Score and MMDAI Endoscopy Subscale at End of Week 6
|
52.6 percentage of participants
|
37.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=133 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Bowel frequency score: Baseline
|
1.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
1.9 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Bowel frequency score: Change at Week 6
|
-0.7 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.5 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Rectal Bleeding score:Baseline
|
2.1 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
2.1 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Rectal Bleeding score: Change at Week 6
|
-1.2 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
PGA score:Baseline
|
1.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
1.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
PGA score: Change at Week 6
|
-0.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
-0.5 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Endoscopy score:Baseline
|
2.1 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
2.1 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Endoscopy score: Change at Week 6
|
-0.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.5 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Total score:Baseline
|
7.8 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
7.9 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
Total score: Change at Week 6
|
-3.5 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
-2.4 unit on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
Adverse Events
Budesonide
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=134 participants at risk
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=131 participants at risk
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Ectopic pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/72 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.2%
1/80 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis limb
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Budesonide
n=134 participants at risk
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, received 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=131 participants at risk
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS received 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
3.1%
4/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue geographic
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rales
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
2.3%
3/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorectal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Nipple pain
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent bowel movements
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal tenderness
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctalgia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
3.0%
4/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.0%
4/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal sounds abnormal
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal prolapse
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal pruritus
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
2.3%
3/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Application site pain
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cortisol decreased
|
18.7%
25/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose abnormal
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Investigations
ACTH stimulation test abnormal
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal insufficiency
|
5.2%
7/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ingrown hair
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Purpura senile
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
1.5%
2/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypochloraemia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
1.5%
2/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.0%
4/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.76%
1/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
1.4%
1/72 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/80 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Sexual dysfunction
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.75%
1/134 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/131 • From start of study drug up to Week 8
Safety population included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of the study drug. 1 participant was randomized to placebo, but received both placebo and budesonide during study. This participant was analyzed in placebo group in all efficacy analyses and is summarized in budesonide group in all safety analyses.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Please contact Sponsor directly for additional information.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER