Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intraperitoneal Mesh-Implementation After Laparotomy (NCT NCT01003067)

NCT ID: NCT01003067

Last Updated: 2019-08-15

Results Overview

Primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernias at 2 years following midline laparotomy.

Recruitment status

UNKNOWN

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

267 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2 years

Results posted on

2019-08-15

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
No Mesh
conventional abdominal closure with a suture
Mesh Implementation
Mesh implementation: Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation in laparoscopic surgery to prevent incisional hernia.
Overall Study
STARTED
136
131
Overall Study
COMPLETED
103
107
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
33
24

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Intraperitoneal Mesh-Implementation After Laparotomy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
No Mesh
n=136 Participants
The closure technique consisted of a single-layer continuous suture technique with picking up all layers of the abdominal wall apart from subcutaneous fat and skin (peritoneum, posterior rectus sheath, rectus muscle and anterior rectus sheath).
Mesh Implementation
n=131 Participants
Mesh implementation: Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation in laparoscopic surgery to prevent incisional hernia.
Total
n=267 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2 • n=5 Participants
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=7 Participants
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
60 Participants
n=7 Participants
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
136 participants
n=5 Participants
131 participants
n=7 Participants
267 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernias at 2 years following midline laparotomy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
No Mesh
n=103 Participants
conventional abdominal closure with a suture
Mesh Implementation
n=107 Participants
Mesh implementation: Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation in laparoscopic surgery to prevent incisional hernia.
Number of Participants With Incisional Hernia At 2 Years Following Median Laparotomy
40 participants
18 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 5 Years

Secondary endpoints are the feasibility, the safety of the mesh stripe implantation including postoperative pain, and the incidence of incisional hernias at 5 years.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

No Mesh

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 10 deaths

Mesh Implementation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 4 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
No Mesh
n=136 participants at risk
conventional abdominal closure with a suture
Mesh Implementation
n=131 participants at risk
Mesh implementation: Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation in laparoscopic surgery to prevent incisional hernia.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bowel Fistulation
0.00%
0/136
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2

Additional Information

Prof. Christoph A. Maurer

Hirslanden Bern

Phone: +41 31 335 33 33

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place