Image Evaluation of Philips Philips MammoDiagnost DR Full Field Digital Mammography System (FFDM)
NCT ID: NCT00999596
Last Updated: 2012-12-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
107 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-04-30
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Per the new FDA Guidance document for FFDM, accuracy in comparison to Screen-film is no longer required.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Per the new FDA Guidance document for FFDM (Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Full-Field Digital Mammography System), there is no longer a requirement for screen film images for a comparison and a reader study to determine accuracy is not required. 10 images acquired under protocols 2008-002a, 2010-002a and a European site will be read in a MQSA type study. This record has been modified to support the new FDA Guidance document.
The reviewers will evaluate the cases, using soft copy and hard copy images, noting the mammographic attributes for each case and documenting the findings on a clinical image evaluation form, which is very similar to what is used for MQSA Accreditation.
The following attributes will be assessed: in order to provide an overall assessment of whether these image sets collectively are of sufficient acceptable quality for mammography:
* Breast positioning, assessing coverage of the breast on craniocaudal(CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views, separately;
* Exposure, assessing visualization of the adipose and fibroglandular tissues and visualization of breast tissue underlying the pectoralis muscle, separately;
* Breast compression, assessing overlapping breast structures, uniformity of exposure of fibroglandular tissues, adequacy of penetration of thicker portions of the breast, exposure of thinner areas, and motion unsharpness;
* Image contrast for differentiation of subtle tissue density differences;
* Sharpness, assessing the edges of fine linear structures and tissues;
* Borders and benign calcifications;
* Tissue visibility at the skin line;
* Noise, i.e., noise obscuring breast structures or suggestive of structures not actually present;
* Artifacts due to image processing, detector failure and other factors external to the breast on hard-copy and soft-copy displays; and
* Overall clinical image quality
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography)
Mammograms from the Philips Digital System
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. At least 40 years of age
3. Provides written informed consent indicating willingness to participate in this research study prior to performance of the Philips FFDM mammogram
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients undergoing a unilateral mammogram or an incomplete SF mammogram
3. had previously undergone an excisional breast biopsy
4. Pregnant women or patients who believe they may be pregnant
(f) Inmates (in accordance with 45 CFR 46.306)
(g) Patients who cannot, for any reason, undergo follow-up mammography examinations (where clinically indicated) at the participating institution
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philips Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Linda Jalbert
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Philips Healthcare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
George Washington Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Strahleninstitut CDT
Cologne, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PMSDR-2008-002 & 2010-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id