Image Evaluation of Philips Philips MammoDiagnost DR Full Field Digital Mammography System (FFDM)

NCT ID: NCT00999596

Last Updated: 2012-12-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

107 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this investigation, using hardcopy film, is to compare the accuracy of the Philips MammoDiagnost DR (FFDM device) and screen-film (SF) mammography in detection of breast cancer among women undergoing screening or diagnostic mammography.

Per the new FDA Guidance document for FFDM, accuracy in comparison to Screen-film is no longer required.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed research study is a prospective enriched reader trial in which patients who meet the study's eligibility criteria, subject to certain constraints specified in this protocol, will undergo both SF and the investigational Philips FFDM mammography. Two to five sites will participate as image acquisition centers. Images will be read by 9 mammographers reading the SF and Philips FFDM acquired images at various locations under the supervision of study managers.

Per the new FDA Guidance document for FFDM (Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Full-Field Digital Mammography System), there is no longer a requirement for screen film images for a comparison and a reader study to determine accuracy is not required. 10 images acquired under protocols 2008-002a, 2010-002a and a European site will be read in a MQSA type study. This record has been modified to support the new FDA Guidance document.

The reviewers will evaluate the cases, using soft copy and hard copy images, noting the mammographic attributes for each case and documenting the findings on a clinical image evaluation form, which is very similar to what is used for MQSA Accreditation.

The following attributes will be assessed: in order to provide an overall assessment of whether these image sets collectively are of sufficient acceptable quality for mammography:

* Breast positioning, assessing coverage of the breast on craniocaudal(CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views, separately;
* Exposure, assessing visualization of the adipose and fibroglandular tissues and visualization of breast tissue underlying the pectoralis muscle, separately;
* Breast compression, assessing overlapping breast structures, uniformity of exposure of fibroglandular tissues, adequacy of penetration of thicker portions of the breast, exposure of thinner areas, and motion unsharpness;
* Image contrast for differentiation of subtle tissue density differences;
* Sharpness, assessing the edges of fine linear structures and tissues;
* Borders and benign calcifications;
* Tissue visibility at the skin line;
* Noise, i.e., noise obscuring breast structures or suggestive of structures not actually present;
* Artifacts due to image processing, detector failure and other factors external to the breast on hard-copy and soft-copy displays; and
* Overall clinical image quality

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Breast Cancer Digital Mammography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography)

Mammograms from the Philips Digital System

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient underwent or is scheduled to undergo a screening or diagnostic mammogram examination (right and left craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique with or without special views) at one of the acquisition centers during the course of this research study.
2. At least 40 years of age
3. Provides written informed consent indicating willingness to participate in this research study prior to performance of the Philips FFDM mammogram

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of a breast implant,
2. Patients undergoing a unilateral mammogram or an incomplete SF mammogram
3. had previously undergone an excisional breast biopsy
4. Pregnant women or patients who believe they may be pregnant

(f) Inmates (in accordance with 45 CFR 46.306)

(g) Patients who cannot, for any reason, undergo follow-up mammography examinations (where clinically indicated) at the participating institution
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philips Healthcare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Linda Jalbert

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Philips Healthcare

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

George Washington Medical Faculty Associates

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Strahleninstitut CDT

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PMSDR-2008-002 & 2010-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id