Proximal Humeral Comminuted Fractures in the Elderly - PERCELE Trial

NCT ID: NCT00999193

Last Updated: 2025-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2024-02-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fractures of the proximal humerus are common in elderly patients. The optimal treatment of comminuted, displaced fractures is subject to controversy, and the results of operative treatment have not been shown to be superior to conservative treatment. The aim of the study is to compare locking plate osteosynthesis versus treatment with fracture hemiarthroplasty versus conservative treatment in a randomised, controlled protocol. The results of treatment are measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Main outcome measures are Pain at rest and activity (NRSs) and functional assessment of the shoulder with Constant Score. Secondary outcome measures are Simple Shoulder test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), quality of life assessment (15D), subjective patient satisfaction and costs. The study also has a cohort follow-up of the patiens who decline randomisation.

The recruitment target was 90 patients, but the study recruitment was stopped due to slow recruitment (too few patients presenting with eligibile injury to the hospital) at 60 patients in November 2019.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Humeral Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conservative Treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conservative treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Immobilisation in a supporting brace for 3 weeks, then increasingly active rehabilitation program supported by a physiotherapist until 12 weeks of the injury.

ORIF w. locking plate, no luxation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

locking plate, ORIF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open reduction of the fracture (and GH joint), internal fixation with a locking plate. Tuberculum fragments are sutured to the plate with thick non-absorbable suture.

Hemiarthroplasty, no luxation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hemiarthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Replacement of the humeral articular head with hemiprosthesis. Tubercles are sutured to the prosthesis with thick nonabsorbable sutures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

locking plate, ORIF

Open reduction of the fracture (and GH joint), internal fixation with a locking plate. Tuberculum fragments are sutured to the plate with thick non-absorbable suture.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hemiarthroplasty

Replacement of the humeral articular head with hemiprosthesis. Tubercles are sutured to the prosthesis with thick nonabsorbable sutures.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conservative treatment

Immobilisation in a supporting brace for 3 weeks, then increasingly active rehabilitation program supported by a physiotherapist until 12 weeks of the injury.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 65 years and older
* Acute trauma: 1. randomisation (op vs cons) within 7 days of injury.
* 3- or 4-part fracture with \>5mm dislocation of the anatomic neck.

* AO classification C1-2 for non-luxation fractures
* AO classification C3 for luxation fractures

Exclusion Criteria

* Head Splitting fracture
* Open fracture
* Additional fractures in the shoulder region
* Other injuries requiring surgical treatment
* Clinically significant injury of the brachial plexus or vasculature
* Pathological fracture associated with cancer
* History of a fracture of the clavicle, scapula or humerus, or history of a very significant disease or trauma of the shoulder region (hemiparesis, tumour, osteomyelitis, grave arthrosis etc)
* Rheumatoid Arthritis in the shoulder requiring active treatment
* Reduced co-operation or incapability for independent living (dementia, mental illness, drug- or alcohol abuse etc)
* unwillingness to accept some of the treatment options.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Helsinki

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tuomas Lahdeoja

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tuomas Lähdeoja, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Helsinki

Mika Paavola, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Helsinki

Jarkko Pajarinen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Helsinki

Seppo Koskinen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Helsinki

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Töölö Hospital Trauma Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital,

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35727196 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUS-428/13/03/02/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4
Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT07060664 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
LPHP-Philos-PHN Conservative Treatment
NCT00205959 COMPLETED PHASE4