Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of 0.5% Ivermectin Cream to Placebo in Lice Infested Subjects (NCT NCT00994422)

NCT ID: NCT00994422

Last Updated: 2012-04-06

Results Overview

Treatment success was defined as the absence of live lice and was determined by visual examination of hair and scalp by a trained evaluator.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

264 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Days 2 up to Day 15 post-treatment

Results posted on

2012-04-06

Participant Flow

Participants were enrolled and treated from 13 October 2009 to 02 December 2009 in 12 US clinical centers.

A total of 247 of the 264 randomized participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria received treatment in the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Overall Study
STARTED
192
55
Overall Study
COMPLETED
185
54
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
7
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
7
1

Baseline Characteristics

Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of 0.5% Ivermectin Cream to Placebo in Lice Infested Subjects

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
n=192 Participants
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Total
n=247 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
182 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
15.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=5 Participants
19.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=7 Participants
16.76 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.32 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
161 Participants
n=5 Participants
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
203 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
247 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Days 2 up to Day 15 post-treatment

Population: Treatment success was assessed in the Intent-to-treat population. Any participant with live lice on or after Day 2 received an FDA approved head lice treatment and was classified as a treatment failure, imputed as such for remaining assessments.

Treatment success was defined as the absence of live lice and was determined by visual examination of hair and scalp by a trained evaluator.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
n=192 Participants
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success Following Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
95 Percent of Participants
53 Percent of Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success Following Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Day 8 (N = 191, 55)
83 Percent of Participants
49 Percent of Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success Following Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Day 15 (N = 185, 54)
76 Percent of Participants
35 Percent of Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 post-application

Population: Adverse events were assessed in the Intent-to-treat (Safety) population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
n=192 Participants
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Conjunctivitis
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Application site pruritus
1 Participants
1 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Influenza
2 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Nail bed infection
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Pharyngitis
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Pyoderma
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Swine influenza
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Upper respiratory tract infection
5 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Contusion
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Excoriation
8 Participants
4 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Scratch
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Headache
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Asthma
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Dyspnoea
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Oropharyngeal pain
2 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Erythema
2 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Pruritus
4 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Post-Treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Rash maculo-papular
1 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 15 post-application

Population: Local tolerability was assessed in the Intent-to-treat (Safety) population.

Participants skin/scalp irritations were assessed before treatment (Day 1) and Post-treatment with either Ivermectin or placebo by a trained evaluator. Severe scalp irritations were defined as follows: Severe Pruritus - Nearly constant, frequent scratching, very bothersome; Severe Erythema - Large areas of the scalp are red; Severe Excoriation: Widespread breaking of the skin involving most of the scalp; Severe Pyoderma - Lesions with crusting or other evidence of infection, involving most of the scalp.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
n=192 Participants
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Erythema Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N = 192, 55)
26 Participants
5 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Erythema Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N = 192, 55)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Erythema Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
18 Participants
3 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Erythema Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Erythema Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
7 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Erythema Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Erythema Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
3 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Erythema Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Excoriation Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N = 192, 55)
31 Participants
7 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Excoriation Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N=192, 55
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Excoriation Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
27 Participants
7 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Excoriation Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Excoriation Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
15 Participants
2 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Excoriation Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Excoriation Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
4 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Excoriation Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pruritus Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N = 192, 55)
134 Participants
36 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pruritus Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N = 192, 55)
17 Participants
3 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pruritus Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
56 Participants
25 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pruritus Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pruritus Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
32 Participants
5 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pruritus Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pruritus Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
8 Participants
2 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pruritus Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pyoderma Day 1 (Pre-treatment, N = 192, 55)
1 Participants
1 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pyoderma Day 1 (Pre-treatment; N = 192, 55)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pyoderma Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
1 Participants
1 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pyoderma Day 2 (N = 192, 55)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pyoderma Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
1 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pyoderma Day 8 (N = 181, 29)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Any Pyoderma Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Summary of the Reported Skin/Scalp Irritations Before and Post-treatment With Either Ivermectin or Placebo (Vehicle Control)
Severe Pyoderma Day 15 (N = 152, 26)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

Adverse Events

0.5% Ivermectin

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo (Vehicle Control)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
0.5% Ivermectin
n=192 participants at risk
Participants received a single application of Ivermectin cream on Day 1.
Placebo (Vehicle Control)
n=55 participants at risk
Participants received a single application of vehicle control cream on Day 1.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
4.2%
8/192 • Adverse event data were collected form Day 1 up to Day 28 post-treatment with either Ivermectin or Placebo
7.3%
4/55 • Adverse event data were collected form Day 1 up to Day 28 post-treatment with either Ivermectin or Placebo

Additional Information

Medical Director

Sanofi Topaz

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor must have the opportunity to review at least 60 days prior to submission for publication or presentation. If review indicates that potentially patentable subject matter would be disclosed, publication or public disclosure may be delayed for a maximum of an additional 60 days to allow for filing the necessary patent applications
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER