Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction
NCT01404351
PEAK PlasmaBlade⢠vs. Traditional Electrosurgery in Abdominoplasty
NCT00943150
Evaluation of the BTL-785F Device for Submental Fat Reduction and Neck Rejuvenation
NCT06274177
Shock Waves for Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy and Localized Fat
NCT03275259
rPMS and Radiofrequency for Abdominal Toning and Reduction of Subcutaneous Fat
NCT04587986
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The PEAK PlasmaBlade⢠uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy and a highly-insulated handpiece design to enable precision cutting and coagulation at the point of application. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery, and has demonstrated a significantly reduced thermal injury profile in incised tissue compared to traditional electrosurgical devices. It is hypothesized that this benefit may improve the post-operative outcome of patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction.
A total of forty-five (45) subjects were enrolled into the study. Forty-three (43) underwent bilateral breast reduction, and two (2) subjects were withdrawn prior to surgery. Enrollment and surgeries took place between 18 September 2009 and 12 August 2011. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were required to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subject operative sites were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PlasmaBlade (PB or PEAK) study groups and scheduled for bilateral breast reduction. Subjects were unaware of which device was used on which breast. Subjects were required to attend two follow-up visits after surgery, approximately one and six weeks following surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PlasmaBlade arm
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
PEAK PlasmaBlade
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
Standard of Care
Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel
Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEAK PlasmaBlade
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel
Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Physically healthy, stable weight, non-smoker
3. Desiring bilateral breast reduction
4. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure.
5. Subject must be willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations.
6. Female subjects must either be no longer capable of reproduction, or taking acceptable measures to prevent pregnancy during the study, and have a negative pregnancy test prior to participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
3. Smoking (any kind)
4. Infection (local or systemic)
5. Cognitive impairment or mental illness
6. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
7. Known coagulopathy
8. Immunocompromised
9. Prior history of breast cancer
10. Kidney disease (any type)
11. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
12. Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass
13. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
14. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up
20 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Surgical Technologies
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abhay Gupta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gupta Plastic Surgery
Howard Rosenberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Accent on Aesthetics Plastic Surgery
Susan Downey, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Susan Downey, MD, FACS
Larry Pollack, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Del Mar Plastic Surgery
Hooman Soltanian, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Cleveland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Providence St. Joseph's
Burbank, California, United States
Verdugo Hills Hospital
Glendale, California, United States
El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, United States
Tri-City Medical Center
Oceanside, California, United States
Sharp Outpatient Pavilion
San Diego, California, United States
Rancho Bernardo Surgery Center
San Diego, California, United States
University Hospitals
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEAK VP-00065
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.