PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction

NCT ID: NCT00986453

Last Updated: 2013-01-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the operative performance of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 during bilateral breast reduction; to monitor and record post-operative pain, adverse events and skin scarring following surgery; and compare these outcomes to the current standard of care (SOC).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bilateral breast reduction is a surgical procedure performed to remove excess breast tissue from both female breasts for therapeutic or cosmetic indications. The purpose of the breast reduction is to decrease the weight of the breasts and restructure the breast tissue for a more favorable appearance. Typically, a scalpel is used for the skin incision and a traditional electrosurgical device is used to cut away any excess tissue.

The PEAK PlasmaBladeā„¢ uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy and a highly-insulated handpiece design to enable precision cutting and coagulation at the point of application. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery, and has demonstrated a significantly reduced thermal injury profile in incised tissue compared to traditional electrosurgical devices. It is hypothesized that this benefit may improve the post-operative outcome of patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction.

A total of forty-five (45) subjects were enrolled into the study. Forty-three (43) underwent bilateral breast reduction, and two (2) subjects were withdrawn prior to surgery. Enrollment and surgeries took place between 18 September 2009 and 12 August 2011. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were required to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subject operative sites were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PlasmaBlade (PB or PEAK) study groups and scheduled for bilateral breast reduction. Subjects were unaware of which device was used on which breast. Subjects were required to attend two follow-up visits after surgery, approximately one and six weeks following surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Macromastia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PlasmaBlade arm

The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PEAK PlasmaBlade

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.

Standard of Care

Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PEAK PlasmaBlade

The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel

Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PlasmaBlade Scalpel Electrosurgery SOC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 20 and 60
2. Physically healthy, stable weight, non-smoker
3. Desiring bilateral breast reduction
4. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure.
5. Subject must be willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations.
6. Female subjects must either be no longer capable of reproduction, or taking acceptable measures to prevent pregnancy during the study, and have a negative pregnancy test prior to participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age younger than 20 or greater than 60 years old
2. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
3. Smoking (any kind)
4. Infection (local or systemic)
5. Cognitive impairment or mental illness
6. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
7. Known coagulopathy
8. Immunocompromised
9. Prior history of breast cancer
10. Kidney disease (any type)
11. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
12. Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass
13. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
14. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Surgical Technologies

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abhay Gupta, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gupta Plastic Surgery

Howard Rosenberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Accent on Aesthetics Plastic Surgery

Susan Downey, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Susan Downey, MD, FACS

Larry Pollack, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Del Mar Plastic Surgery

Hooman Soltanian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Cleveland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Providence St. Joseph's

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

Verdugo Hills Hospital

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

El Camino Hospital

Mountain View, California, United States

Site Status

Tri-City Medical Center

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Outpatient Pavilion

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Bernardo Surgery Center

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PEAK VP-00065

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laryngeal Masks for Bariatric Surgery
NCT01724970 UNKNOWN PHASE3