Trial Outcomes & Findings for Validation of a New Shortness of Breath With Daily Activities Questionnaire in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (NCT NCT00984659)
NCT ID: NCT00984659
Last Updated: 2018-08-29
Results Overview
Cronbach's alpha (CA) is a measure of the IC of the 13-item SOBDA questionnaire (completed via electronic diary by a sample of participants). It is the ratio of the variance (var.) of the sum of the individual scores and the var. of the total score. The var. of the sum of a group of independent variables is the sum of their var.; thus, if the variables are positively correlated, the var. of the sum will be increased. If the items making up the score are identical and so perfectly correlated, CA=1. If the items are independent, CA=0. Higher scores indicate a more reliable (precise) instrument.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
366 participants
Day 1 of the 2-week Run-in Period
2018-08-29
Participant Flow
The number of participants "enrolled" in the Protocol reflects the number of participants starting treatment in the Double-blind Treatment Period.
After Screening (Visit 1), the study commenced with a 2-week Run-in Period, during which participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication. Eligible participants at Visit 2 were randomized to receive one of three treatments in the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Albuterol and/or Ipratropium: Run-in Period
Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during the 2-week Run-in Period
|
Placebo: Double-blind Treatment Period
Matching placebo via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation twice daily (BID) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
SAL 50 mcg: Double-blind Treatment Period
Salmeterol xinafoate (SAL) 50 micrograms (mcg) per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
FSC 250/50 mcg: Double-blind Treatment Period
Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate fixed dose combination product (FSC) 250/50 mcg per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2-week Run-in Period
STARTED
|
418
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
COMPLETED
|
366
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
52
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
STARTED
|
0
|
75
|
152
|
139
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
69
|
141
|
126
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
6
|
11
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Albuterol and/or Ipratropium: Run-in Period
Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during the 2-week Run-in Period
|
Placebo: Double-blind Treatment Period
Matching placebo via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation twice daily (BID) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
SAL 50 mcg: Double-blind Treatment Period
Salmeterol xinafoate (SAL) 50 micrograms (mcg) per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
FSC 250/50 mcg: Double-blind Treatment Period
Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate fixed dose combination product (FSC) 250/50 mcg per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Adverse Event
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Study Closed/Terminated
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Physician Decision
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2-week Run-in Period
Did Not Meet Continuation Criteria
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Adverse Event
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Study Closed/Terminated
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
7
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Validation of a New Shortness of Breath With Daily Activities Questionnaire in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Matching placebo via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation twice daily (BID)
|
SAL 50 mcg
n=152 Participants
Salmeterol xinafoate (SAL) 50 micrograms (mcg) per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID
|
FSC 250/50 mcg
n=139 Participants
Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate fixed dose combination product (FSC) 250/50 mcg per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID
|
Albuterol and/or Ipratropium: Run-in Failure
n=52 Participants
Participants who entered the 2-week Run-in Period, during which they were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication, but then failed to be randomized, or were randomized but did not receive a dose of study medication
|
Total
n=418 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.82 • n=93 Participants
|
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58 • n=4 Participants
|
60.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.45 • n=27 Participants
|
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61 • n=483 Participants
|
61.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.65 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
179 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
46 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
239 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
|
9 participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 participants
n=27 Participants
|
8 participants
n=483 Participants
|
41 participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 participants
n=483 Participants
|
1 participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
65 participants
n=93 Participants
|
140 participants
n=4 Participants
|
127 participants
n=27 Participants
|
44 participants
n=483 Participants
|
376 participants
n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 of the 2-week Run-in PeriodPopulation: Run-in Population: all participants who completed Visit 2 (Day 1 of Treatment Period), including those who were not randomized, were randomized but did not receive a dose of study medication, and those who were randomized and received study medication. Participants with a score for each SOBDA item on Day 1 of the 2-week Run-in Period were analyzed.
Cronbach's alpha (CA) is a measure of the IC of the 13-item SOBDA questionnaire (completed via electronic diary by a sample of participants). It is the ratio of the variance (var.) of the sum of the individual scores and the var. of the total score. The var. of the sum of a group of independent variables is the sum of their var.; thus, if the variables are positively correlated, the var. of the sum will be increased. If the items making up the score are identical and so perfectly correlated, CA=1. If the items are independent, CA=0. Higher scores indicate a more reliable (precise) instrument.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=344 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Internal Consistency (IC) of the Shortness of Breath With Daily Activities (SOBDA) Questionnaire in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessed as Cronbach's Alpha Value
|
0.892 ratio of variance
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 and Week 2 of the 2-week Run-in PeriodPopulation: Run-in Population. Data from participants with weekly SOBDA scores at Week 1 and Week 2 of the 2-week Run-in Period and reporting no change on the second weekly PGAC were analyzed.
T-RR=stability during repeat measures over time in a stable population. SOBDA score was determined by the 13-item (it.) scoring algorithm, assigning a weekly mean score of 1-4 (higher scores=more severe breathlessness with daily activities) based on the mean of 7 days of data (or \>=4 days). Daily total score is computed from the mean of the participant's (par.) scores on the 13 it. (\>=7 it. must have non-missing responses). Only scores of stable par. (indicating no change \[score=3\] on the par.-completed Patient Global Assessment of Change \[PGAC\]; 1 \[ much worse\] to 5 \[much better\]) were used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=152 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Test-retest Reliability (T-RR) of SOBDA Scores Measured as the Difference in the SOBDA Weekly Score Between Week 1 and Week 2 of the 2-week Run-in Period
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.244
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and pre-treatment on Visit 2 (Day 1 of the 6-week Treatment Period)Population: Run-in Population. Participants with a SOBDA Baseline score and the indicated assessment at Visit 2 were analyzed. One participant who rated their own trouble breathing had missing data for the physician assessment.
Convergent validity is defined as the ability of the SOBDA questionnaire to measure required information and was assessed by examining the relationship between the SOBDA score and the participant/physician-completed mMRC Dyspnea Scale assessments. The physician/participant rated the degree of the participant's dyspnea (trouble breathing) on the 5-point mMRC scale (0, none; 4, very severe). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient assesses if the relationship between two variables is monotone. A correlation of +1 or -1 will occur if one variable is a perfect monotone of the other.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=340 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Convergent Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as Correlations of the Baseline SOBDA Score With Participant-completed Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and Physician-completed mMRC Scores at Visit 2
Physician-completed mMRC, n=339
|
0.24 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
|
Convergent Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as Correlations of the Baseline SOBDA Score With Participant-completed Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and Physician-completed mMRC Scores at Visit 2
Participant-completed mMRC, n=340
|
0.29 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and pre-treatment on Visit 2 (Day 1 of the 6-week Treatment Period)Population: Run-in Population. Participants with a SOBDA Baseline score and the indicated assessment at Visit 2 were analyzed.
Convergent validity is defined as the ability of the SOBDA questionnaire to measure the required information and was assessed by examining the relationship between the SOBDA score with the CGI-S score. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient assesses if the relationship between two variables is monotone. A correlation of +1 or -1 will occur if one variable is a perfect monotone of the other. Clinicians were asked to assess the severity of the participant's dyspnea on the CGI-S scale. This was evaluated on a 1-4 Likert scale: 1 (mild) to 4 (very severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=338 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Convergent Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Correlation of the Baseline SOBDA Score With the Clinician Global Assessment of Dyspnea Severity (CGI-S) Score at Visit 2
|
0.24 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and pre-treatment on Visit 2 (Day 1 of the 6-week Treatment Period)Population: Run-in Population. Participants with a SOBDA Baseline score and the indicated assessment at Visit 2 were analyzed.
Convergent validity is defined as the ability of the SOBDA questionnaire to measure required information and was assessed by examining the relationship between the SOBDA score and the CRQ-SAS dyspnea domain score. Pearson's correlation coefficient is a measure of the linear dependence between 2 variables. A correlation of +1 or -1 will occur if the data from the 2 variables lie exactly on a line. The CRQ is a 20-item instrument measuring 4 domains (each measured on a scale of 1 \[maximum impairment\] to 7 \[no impairment\]) of functioning: mastery, fatigue, emotional function, and dyspnea.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=340 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Convergent Validity (CV) for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Correlation of the Baseline SOBDA Score With the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire-Self-Administered Standardized (CRQ-SAS) Dyspnea Domain Score at Visit 2
|
-0.68 Pearson's correlation coefficient
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and pre-treatment on Visit 2 (Day 1 of the 6-week Treatment Period)Population: Run-in Population. Participants with a SOBDA Baseline score and the Physician-completed mMRC score at Visit 2 were analyzed.
SOBDA known group validity refers to the extent to which scores from the SOBDA questionnaire should differentiate participants with varying levels of dyspnea severity. It was assessed by comparing summary measures for the SOBDA score for each indicated level (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) of the PyC mMRC. The physician rated the degree of the participant's dyspnea on the 5-point mMRC scale: 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Known group validity was confirmed if the SOBDA score increased with increasing values of PyC mMRC, both indicating increased levels of breathlessness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=339 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Physician-completed (PyC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
PyC mMRC: 0 to 1, n=12
|
1.78 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.196
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Physician-completed (PyC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
PyC mMRC: 2, n=200
|
2.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.048
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Physician-completed (PyC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
PyC mMRC: 3, n=117
|
2.28 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Physician-completed (PyC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
PyC mMRC: 4, n=10
|
2.73 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.216
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and pre-treatment on Visit 2 (Day 1 of the 6-week Treatment Period)Population: Run-in Population. Participants with a SOBDA Baseline score and the Participant-completed mMRC score at Visit 2 were analyzed.
SOBDA known group validity refers to the extent to which scores from the SOBDA questionnaire should differentiate participants with varying levels of dyspnea severity. It was assessed by comparing summary measures for the SOBDA score for each indicated level (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) of the ParC mMRC. The participant rated the degree of his/her dyspnea on the 5-point mMRC scale: 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Known group validity was confirmed if the SOBDA score increased with increasing values of ParC mMRC, both indicating increased levels of breathlessness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=340 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Participant-completed (ParC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
ParC mMRC: 0, n=12
|
1.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.192
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Participant-completed (ParC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
ParC mMRC: 1, n=103
|
1.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.066
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Participant-completed (ParC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
ParC mMRC: 2, n=138
|
2.20 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Participant-completed (ParC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
ParC mMRC: 3, n=65
|
2.26 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
|
Known Group Validity for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of the Participant-completed (ParC) mMRC Score at Visit 2
ParC mMRC: 4, n=22
|
2.73 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.142
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and pre-treatement on Visit 2 (Day 1 of the 6-week Treatment Period)Population: Run-in Population. Participants with a SOBDA Baseline score and the CGI-S score at Visit 2 were analyzed.
SOBDA KGV refers to the extent to which scores from the SOBDA questionnaire should differentiate participants with varying levels of dyspnea severity. It was assessed by comparing summary measures for the SOBDA score for each indicated level (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) of the CGI-S score. Clinicians were asked to assess the severity of the participant's dyspnea on the CGI-S scale. This was evaluated on a 1-4 Likert scale: 1 (mild) to 4 (very severe). KGV was confirmed if the SOBDA score increased with increasing values of CGI-S, both indicating increased levels of breathlessness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=338 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Known Group Validity (KGV) for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of CGI-S Scores at Visit 2
CGI-S: 4, n=5
|
2.72 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.305
|
|
Known Group Validity (KGV) for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of CGI-S Scores at Visit 2
CGI-S: 1, n=19
|
1.87 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.156
|
|
Known Group Validity (KGV) for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of CGI-S Scores at Visit 2
CGI-S: 2, n=236
|
2.11 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
|
|
Known Group Validity (KGV) for the SOBDA Questionnaire Measured as the Comparison of the Baseline SOBDA Score in the Indicated Categories of CGI-S Scores at Visit 2
CGI-S: 3, n=78
|
2.33 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population: all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point.
The PGAC is par. completed on a 1-5 scale: 1, much worse; 2, worse; 3, no change; 4, better; 5, much better. Responders were defined as par. with a rating of "better" or "much better" (score of 4 or 5) on the PGAC at the relevant week; non-responders were defined as par. with a response of "much worse," "worse," or "no change" on the PGAC. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation . The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=303 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Day 8 (Baseline to Week 1), n=293
|
105 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Day 8 (Baseline to Week 1), n=293
|
188 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Day 15 (Week 1 to Week 2), n=303
|
91 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Day 15 (Week 1 to Week 2), n=303
|
212 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Day 22 (Week 2 to Week 3), n=299
|
83 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Day 22 (Week 2 to Week 3), n=299
|
216 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Day 29 (Week 3 to Week 4), n=285
|
62 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Day 29 (Week 3 to Week 4), n=285
|
223 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Day 36 (Week 4 to Week 5), n=277
|
77 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Day 36 (Week 4 to Week 5), n=277
|
200 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Day 43 (Week 5 to Week 6), n=119
|
31 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Day 43 (Week 5 to Week 6), n=119
|
88 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Responders, Last Treatment Week, n=151
|
45 participants
|
|
Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders/Non-responders According to the Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGAC) Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation (PD) (the End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Non-responders, Visit 3/PD, n=151
|
106 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
Responsiveness reflects the ability of the SOBDA questionnaire to detect change under conditions of known change. Responders (Rs)=participants (par.) with a rating of "better"/"much better" (score of 4/5) on the PGAC (range; 1 \[much worse\] to 5 \[much better\]) at the relevant week; NRs=par. with a response of "much worse," "worse," or "no change" (score of 3). Mean difference between Rs and NRs in the change from the previous week to the current week's SOBDA score was calculated. For Visit 3/PD, the change from Baseline to the last treatment week's SOBDA score for Rs and NRs was calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=223 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Baseline to Day 8, responders, n=105
|
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.324
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Baseline to Day 8, non-responders, n=188
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.254
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 8 to Day 15, responders, n=91
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.280
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 8 to Day 15, non-responders, n=212
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.222
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 15 to Day 22, responders, n=83
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.223
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 15 to Day 22, non-responders, n=216
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.183
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 22 to Day 29, responders, n=62
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.198
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 22 to Day 29, non-responders, n=223
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.193
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 29 to Day 36, responders, n=77
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.245
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 29 to Day 36, non-responders, n=200
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.169
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 36 to Day 43, responders, n=31
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.167
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Day 36 to Day 43, non-responders, n=88
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.240
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Baseline to Visit 3/PD, responders, n=45
|
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.497
|
|
Change From the Previous Week to the Current Week's SOBDA Score by Participant-completed PGAC Response at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 and at Visit 3/PD (End of the 6-week Treatment Period or PD)
Baseline to Visit 3/PD, non-responders, n=106
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.423
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
Clinicians were asked to provide their clinical impression regarding change in the participant's shortness of breath by CGI-C. This was evaluated on a 1-5 Likert scale: 1 (much worse) to 5 (much better), with 3 being no change. A CGI-C responder was defined as a participant who had a response of "better" (4) or "much better" (5), and a non-responder was defined as a participant who had a response of "much worse" (1), "worse" (2), or "no change" (3).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=301 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by Clinician Global Impression of Change Question (CGI-C) Response at Visit 3/PD
Responders
|
120 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by Clinician Global Impression of Change Question (CGI-C) Response at Visit 3/PD
Non-responders
|
181 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
A CRQ-SAS dyspnea domain responder was defined as a participant who had a score increase of 0.5 units or more for the dyspnea domain of the CRQ-SAS between Visit 2 and Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation. A non-responder was defined as a participant who had a decrease in the score, or an increase of less than 0.5 units.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=301 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by CRQ-SAS Dyspnea Domain Response at Visit 3/PD
Responders
|
117 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by CRQ-SAS Dyspnea Domain Response at Visit 3/PD
Non-responders
|
184 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
A Physician-completed and Participant-completed mMRC responder was defined as a participant who had a score decrease of one unit or more between Visit 2 and Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation. A non-responder was defined as a participant who had the same score or an increase in score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=301 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by Physician-completed and Participant-completed mMRC Response at Visit 3/PD
Physician-completed mMRC responders
|
91 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by Physician-completed and Participant-completed mMRC Response at Visit 3/PD
Physician-completed mMRC non-responders
|
210 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by Physician-completed and Participant-completed mMRC Response at Visit 3/PD
Participant-completed mMRC responders
|
92 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders by Physician-completed and Participant-completed mMRC Response at Visit 3/PD
Participant-completed mMRC non-responders
|
209 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (2-week Run-in Period) and Week Prior to Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
The responsiveness of the SOBDA questionnaire was assessed by comparing score changes between responders and non-responders. The CGI-C is clinician completed on a 1 to 5 scale: 1, much worse; 2, worse; 3, no change; 4, better; 5, much better. Changes in mean SOBDA scores during the last week of treatment in responders and non-responders using definitions based on the CGI-C conducted at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation were assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=301 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by CGI-C Responses at Visit 3/PD
Responders, n=120
|
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.484
|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by CGI-C Responses at Visit 3/PD
Non-responders, n=181
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.413
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (2-week Run-in Period) and Week Prior to Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
The responsiveness of the SOBDA questionnaire was assessed by comparing score changes of responders (Rs) versus non-responders (NRs). The CRQ-SAS DD includes 5 questions (q.) scored 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). Individual q. were equally weighted, and domain scores (DSs) (range=1-7) were calculated as the mean across the non-missing items within each domain (DSs were calculated although an individual item score was missing). Changes in mean SOBDA scores during the last treatment week in Rs and NRs using definitions based on the CRQ-SAS DD conducted at Visit 3/PD were assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=301 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by CRQ-SAS Dyspnea Domain (DD) Responses at Visit 3/PD
Responders, n=117
|
-0.32 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.446
|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by CRQ-SAS Dyspnea Domain (DD) Responses at Visit 3/PD
Non-responders, n=184
|
0.01 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.416
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (2-week Run-in Period) and Week Prior to Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
The responsiveness of the SOBDA questionnaire was assessed by comparing score changes between responders and non-responders. The mMRC ranges from 0 (no breathlessness except with strenous exercise) to 4 (too breathless to leave the house; breathless when dressing/undressing) and is completed by the clinician or the participant as indicated. Changes in mean SOBDA scores during the last week of treatment in responders and non-responders using definitions based on the Physician-completed (Ph-C) and Participant-completed (Pa-C) mMRC conducted at Visit 3/Premature Discontinuation were assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=301 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by Physician-completed mMRC and Participant-completed mMRC Responses at Visit 3/PD
Pa-C mMRC, non-responders, n=209
|
-0.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.428
|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by Physician-completed mMRC and Participant-completed mMRC Responses at Visit 3/PD
Ph-C mMRC, responders, n=91
|
-0.13 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.416
|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by Physician-completed mMRC and Participant-completed mMRC Responses at Visit 3/PD
Ph-C mMRC, non-responders, n=210
|
-0.11 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.472
|
|
Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score by Physician-completed mMRC and Participant-completed mMRC Responses at Visit 3/PD
Pa-C mMRC, responders, n=92
|
-0.18 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.508
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (last week of the 2-week Run-in Period) and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (6-week Treatment Period)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation . The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
Changes from Baseline in the SOBDA score for responders (Rs) and non-responders (NRs) (using the PGAC assessment; 1 \[much worse\] to 5 \[much better\]), together with the cumulative proportions of Rs and NRs, was used to establish the threshold for defining SOBDA questionnaire Rs. The threshold of response is a score change in the SOBDA questionnaire that is demonstrated to have a perceivable benefit for the participant. The threshold of response was evaluated as the change from Baseline in the SOBDA score based on PGAC scores pre-specified as "better" or demonstrating meaningful improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=97 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From the Previous Week's SOBDA Score Based on a Participant-completed PGAC Score Rated of "Better"
Week 5 to Week 6, n=26
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.181
|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From the Previous Week's SOBDA Score Based on a Participant-completed PGAC Score Rated of "Better"
Baseline to Week 1, n=97
|
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.325
|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From the Previous Week's SOBDA Score Based on a Participant-completed PGAC Score Rated of "Better"
Week 1 to Week 2, n=82
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.219
|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From the Previous Week's SOBDA Score Based on a Participant-completed PGAC Score Rated of "Better"
Week 2 to Week 3, n=70
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.216
|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From the Previous Week's SOBDA Score Based on a Participant-completed PGAC Score Rated of "Better"
Week 3 to Week 4, n=49
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.216
|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From the Previous Week's SOBDA Score Based on a Participant-completed PGAC Score Rated of "Better"
Week 4 to Week 5, n=66
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.255
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week Prior to Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
The threshold of response is a score change in the SOBDA questionnaire that is demonstrated to have a perceivable benefit for the participant. The threshold of response was evaluated as the change from Baseline in the SOBDA score based on CGI-C scores pre-specified as "better" or demonstrating meaningful improvement. The CGI-C is clinician completed on a 1 to 5 scale: 1, much worse, 2, worse; 3, no change; 4, better; 5, much better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=109 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response as Assessed by Mean Change From Baseline to the Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score Based on a CGI-C Response Rated as "Better"
|
-0.25 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.484
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week Prior to Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
The threshold of response (TOR) is a score change in the SOBDA questionnaire that is demonstrated to have a perceivable benefit. The TOR was evaluated as the change from Baseline in the SOBDA score based on CRQ-SAS scores pre-specified as "better" or demonstrating meaningful improvement. The CRQ-SAS DD includes 5 questions (q.) scored 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). Individual q. were equally weighted, and domain scores (DSs) (range=1-7) were calculated as the mean across the non-missing items within each domain (DSs were calculated although an individual item score was missing).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=68 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response as Assessed by Mean Change From Baseline to the Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score Based on a CRQ-SAS Dyspnea Domain (DD) Response Rated as "Better"
|
-0.13 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.417
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week Prior to Visit 3/PD (end of 6-week Treatment Period or earlier up to Week 8)Population: MITT Population. Analyses were conducted on data available for each specified time point. As pre-specified in the study protocol, results are presented independent of treatment allocation. The study objectives were to assess the measurement properties and validity of the SOBDA questionnaire independent of specific treatment effect.
FEV1 response was rated as 1=No change or worse (i.e., change of \<50 mL); 2=Better (i.e., change of 50 to \<100 mL); 3=Much better (i.e., change of \>=100 mL). The threshold of response is a score change in the SOBDA questionnaire that is demonstrated to have a perceivable benefit for the participant. The threshold of response was evaluated as the change from Baseline in the SOBDA score based on study assessment (FEV1) scores pre-specified as "better" or demonstrating meaningful improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants: 2-week Run-in Period
n=42 Participants
All participants in the 2-week Run-in Period. Participants were permitted to use albuterol and/or ipratropium as rescue medication during this period.
|
|---|---|
|
SOBDA Threshold for Response Assessed as Mean Change From Baseline to Last Treatment Week in the SOBDA Score Based on Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Change From Baseline of 50 Milliliters (mL) to <100 mL
|
-0.16 mL
Standard Deviation 0.492
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
SAL 50 mcg
FSC 250/50 mcg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 participants at risk
Matching placebo via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation twice daily (BID)
|
SAL 50 mcg
n=151 participants at risk
Salmeterol xinafoate (SAL) 50 micrograms (mcg) per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID
|
FSC 250/50 mcg
n=139 participants at risk
Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate fixed dose combination product (FSC) 250/50 mcg per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
|
5.3%
4/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired Gastric Emptying
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus Inadequate Control
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular Accident
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide Attempt
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=75 participants at risk
Matching placebo via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation twice daily (BID)
|
SAL 50 mcg
n=151 participants at risk
Salmeterol xinafoate (SAL) 50 micrograms (mcg) per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID
|
FSC 250/50 mcg
n=139 participants at risk
Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate fixed dose combination product (FSC) 250/50 mcg per inhalation via DISKUS, administered as one inhalation BID during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip Swelling
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
|
5.3%
4/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.0%
3/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
2.7%
2/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.6%
4/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.0%
3/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.0%
3/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus Congestion
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Tract Congestion
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Congestion
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis Allergic
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhea
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candidiasis
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.2%
3/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Viral
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory Tract Infection
|
2.7%
2/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastric Infection
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Klebsiella
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tracheobronchitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.7%
2/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
4.0%
6/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
3.6%
5/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sinus Headache
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.2%
3/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular Accident
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Discomfort
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired Gastric Emptying
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain In Extremity
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fibromyalgia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Swelling
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lower Extremity Mass
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Pain
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
2.0%
3/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Adverse Drug Reaction
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Edema Peripheral
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand Fracture
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Ankle Fracture
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Epicondylitis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint Sprain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle Strain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidemia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus Inadequate Control
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
1.3%
2/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nervousness
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide Attempt
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Pressure Increased
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Heart Rate Increased
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung Neoplasm Malignant
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Seborrhoeic Keratosis
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.66%
1/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Periorbital Edema
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Lesion
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
1.3%
1/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear Pain
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Multiple Allergies
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/75
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.00%
0/151
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139
Safety data are presented for the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population, comprised of all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of study medication. Data summaries and analyses were based on the actual treatment received. One participant in the SAL 50 mcg arm was randomized but did not receive treatment.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER