Safety Study of External Counterpulsation as a Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT00983749
Last Updated: 2016-06-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-12-31
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of External Counter Pulsation on Ischemic Stroke
NCT03075137
External Counterpulsation Therapy for Severe Steno-occlusive Intracranial Stenosis
NCT03921827
Remote Ischemic Conditioning Paired With Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT03045055
Endovascular Therapy for Large Core Patients With Uncertain Response to Thrombectomy
NCT06961487
Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy
NCT00389467
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, patients presenting within the first 48 hours of an acute ischemic stroke (i.e., a blockage of one of the arteries supplying a part of the brain) will be randomly assigned to either of (1) a 1-hour treatment of external counterpulsation (ECP) applied at a pressure that is typically therapeutic, or (2) a 1-hour treatment of ECP at a minimal pressure in a control group. ECP-induced changes in brain artery flow velocity will be assessed with an ultrasound prior to and then during ECP in each group, and an optimal pressure that results in an augmentation of flow velocity will be determined. A neurological exam will be performed prior to, during, and after ECP in each group, in order to assess any changes in stroke symptoms related to ECP. Patients will be followed to 30 days. The main goal of this trial is to evaluate if ECP is safe and feasible to use as a treatment for stroke. In addition, the trial will enable an assessment of whether or not ECP increases blood flow to the brain or affects the neurological symptoms of a patient with a stroke.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Full-pressure ECP
Patients in the "Full-pressure ECP" arm receive a 1-hour treatment of ECP at full pressure, which will be applied in a tiered, dose-escalating manner up to 300mmHg, while assessments are made.
Full-pressure ECP
A one-hour treatment of ECP at full pressure, which will be applied in a tiered, dose-escalating manner, starting at 200mmHg and increasing up to 300mmHg based on assessments made.
Sham-pressure ECP
A 1-hour treatment of ECP at an inactive pressure (75mmHg)
Sham-pressure ECP
A one-hour treatment of ECP at an inactive pressure, which will be applied at 75mmHg and kept there for the hour while assessments are made.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Full-pressure ECP
A one-hour treatment of ECP at full pressure, which will be applied in a tiered, dose-escalating manner, starting at 200mmHg and increasing up to 300mmHg based on assessments made.
Sham-pressure ECP
A one-hour treatment of ECP at an inactive pressure, which will be applied at 75mmHg and kept there for the hour while assessments are made.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Symptoms consistent with acute ischemic stroke, with a measurable neurological deficit at presentation
* Ability to initiate external counterpulsation within 48 hours of stroke onset
* No evidence of hemorrhage on CT scan or MRI
* MCA distribution stroke: a total or partial anterior circulation infarct (TACI or PACI by Oxfordshire criteria) consistent with MCA distribution ischemia, or a lacunar stroke felt by the investigator to possibly involve a deep perforating branch in the MCA territory (LACI by Oxfordshire criteria)
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe stroke defined as an NIHSS \> 22
* Intracranial hemorrhage (SAH, EDH, SDH, IPH, hemorrhagic conversion) on CT scan
* Brain tumor or brain abscess on CT scan or MRI
* Presentation consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage (such as a sudden, severe thunderclap headache, or an associated third nerve palsy)
* History of cerebral aneurysm, AVM, or hemorrhagic stroke
* Either treatment or planned treatment of current stroke with standard thrombolytic therapy (intravenous or intra-arterial) or neurothrombectomy
* History of lower limb amputation above the ankle
* History of untreated aortic dissection
* History or suspicion of thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm
* Known significant anomaly of the heart, aorta, or great vessels that would be complicated by elevated diastolic pressures.
* BP \> 180/100 that remains so after minimal treatment (such as one or two doses of an antihypertensive agent, or as determined by the investigator)
* History of non-trivial aortic regurgitation, or any symptomatic valvular heart disease determined by the investigator to be at risk of worsening on ECP
* Significant symptomatic congestive heart failure (orthopnea, CHF-related dyspnea, or rales and jugular venous distention on exam) or a left ventricular ejection fraction known to be \<30%
* Diagnosis of significant lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease (PVOD), or symptomatic PVOD as determined by the investigator (especially symptoms of claudication)
* Phlebitis, stasis ulcer, severe varicosities
* Diagnosis of DVT within the past month, or current symptoms strongly suggestive of new DVT, such as asymmetric calf or leg swelling, discomfort, or erythema (to be evaluated by screening duplex)
* Pacemaker or automated implanted defibrillator (AICD)
* A cardiac dysrhythmia (such as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, or frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or premature atrial contractions (PACs) as determined by the investigator) that would interfere with ECP triggering
* Pregnancy (as determined by a urine pregnancy test in females of child-bearing age)
* Known coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia with platelet count \< 100,000, or taking warfarin with an INR \> 2.0.
* History positive for chronic low back pain, radiculopathy suggestive of herniated lumbar disc, or related surgery
* Known collagen vascular disease
* Obesity to a degree (as determined by the investigator) that would prevent proper placement and/or activation of counterpulsation cuffs
* Any psychological, social, or legal condition that would interfere with the ability of the patient or his or her surrogate to give Informed Consent and/or his or her capacity to comply with all study requirements, including the necessary time commitment
* An inadequate temporal window for TCD insonation.
* Currently involved or have been involved in a clinical trial within the last 30 days.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kama Guluma
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kama Z Guluma, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCSD Medical Center
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPOTRIAS Project 1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.