Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study (NCT NCT00980057)
NCT ID: NCT00980057
Last Updated: 2018-10-16
Results Overview
Patients considered worsened if they died, were hospitalized with worsening heart failure (HF), crossed over to other arm, demonstrated worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, or reported moderately/markedly worse on 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant. Patients are improved if they are not worsened and have an improved NYHA or reported moderately/markedly improved on the 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant Global assessment question for the patient: Specifically in reference to your heart failure symptoms, how do you feel today as compared to how you felt before your CRT system was implanted? O Markedly improved O Moderately improved O Mildly improved O No change O Slightly worse O Moderately worse O Markedly worse
COMPLETED
NA
522 participants
randomization to six month visit
2018-10-16
Participant Flow
Total number of: * 522 pts enrolled, 1 exit * 521 pts with baseline information, 16 exits * 505 pts of which 14 unsuccessful implants and 491 successful implants, 12 exits and 1 death * 478 randomized (318 to aCRT, 160 to control)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
318
|
160
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
299
|
155
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
13
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
4
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=318 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=160 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
Total
n=478 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
|
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=7 Participants
|
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
148 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
221 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
330 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
|
257 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
139 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
396 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Two or more races
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not available
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russia
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
176 participants
n=5 Participants
|
87 participants
n=7 Participants
|
263 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Saudi Arabia
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Norway
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: randomization to six month visitPatients considered worsened if they died, were hospitalized with worsening heart failure (HF), crossed over to other arm, demonstrated worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, or reported moderately/markedly worse on 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant. Patients are improved if they are not worsened and have an improved NYHA or reported moderately/markedly improved on the 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant Global assessment question for the patient: Specifically in reference to your heart failure symptoms, how do you feel today as compared to how you felt before your CRT system was implanted? O Markedly improved O Moderately improved O Mildly improved O No change O Slightly worse O Moderately worse O Markedly worse
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=318 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=160 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Improved Heart Failure Outcomes Clinical Composite Score
|
234 Participants
|
114 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: randomization visit and six month visitPopulation: Concordance correlations have been calculated between AoVTI at Adaptive CRT AV and VV settings vs. echo-optimized AV and VV settings at randomization and 6 M. Paired AoVTI measurements were used for concordance correlation analysis, where each subject served as his/her own control. AoVTI was not obtained at both settings for 79 patients.
Correlation between aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and echo-optimized device settings. AoVTI is an echocardiographic representative of stroke volume and cardiac performance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=399 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Aortic Velocity Time Integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and Echo-optimized Device Settings
|
0.93 Concordance correlation coefficient
Interval 0.91 to 0.94
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: randomization to 6 months post randomizationPopulation: 17 participants did not have data available for analysis of this endpoint.
For each subject, the Adaptive CRT-determined AV and VV delay settings from randomization up to 183-days post-randomization were evaluated to identify any period of 28-days with a wide delay range (\>60 ms)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=301 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With a Safety Event (Inappropriate AV or VV Delay Settings Related to the aCRT Feature)
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: implant to six months post randomizationThe percentage of time the right ventricle is paced by the device
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=314 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=160 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Right Ventricular Pacing Percentage
|
51.3 percentage of right ventricle pacing
Standard Deviation 37.9
|
95.1 percentage of right ventricle pacing
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to six month visitChange in left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=250 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=123 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVi)
|
-8.3 milliliters per meter squared
Standard Deviation 23.3
|
-10.5 milliliters per meter squared
Standard Deviation 24.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to six month visitOutcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=250 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=123 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
|
3.9 percent
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
2.9 percent
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to six month visitThe New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity. Class - Patient Symptoms I - No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). II- Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). III- Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV- Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=296 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=153 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
|
-1.0 NYHA class
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
-0.8 NYHA class
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to six month visitOutcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=284 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=142 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Distance Walked During the Six Minute Hall Walk
|
42.4 meters
Standard Deviation 103.3
|
29.0 meters
Standard Deviation 123.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to six month visitThe MLWHF is a 21 question survey. Scores range from 0-105, with lower scores indicating better health.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=261 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=135 Participants
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF)
|
-19.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.7
|
-17.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.8
|
Adverse Events
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
Standard Biventricular Pacing
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=318 participants at risk
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=160 participants at risk
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
3.8%
6/160 • Number of events 6 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Coagulopathy
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenic infarction
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.94%
3/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve stenosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia supraventricular
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 5 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
3.1%
5/160 • Number of events 8 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 5 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
19.8%
63/318 • Number of events 112 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
21.9%
35/160 • Number of events 58 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
2.2%
7/318 • Number of events 7 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart valve incompetence
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Intracardiac thrombus
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.9%
3/160 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve incompetence
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pulseless electrical activity
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.94%
3/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tricuspid valve disease
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tricuspid valve incompetence
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachyarrhythmia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
2.5%
8/318 • Number of events 8 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
2.5%
4/160 • Number of events 6 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Atrial septal defect
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticular perforation
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocutaneous fistula
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric haemorrhage
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
2.5%
4/160 • Number of events 5 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peptic ulcer
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peritoneal haemorrhage
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
1.9%
6/318 • Number of events 6 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
2.5%
4/160 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device capturing issue
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device connection issue
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device dislocation
|
3.5%
11/318 • Number of events 11 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
4.4%
7/160 • Number of events 10 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device electrical impedance issue
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device lead damage
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device misuse
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device pacing issue
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device psychogenic complication
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device stimulation issue
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Hernia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site haematoma
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site pain
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Polyp
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden cardiac death
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Undersensing
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Campylobacter gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.9%
3/160 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Empyema
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Implant site infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
2.5%
4/160 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Liver abscess
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Parotitis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.0%
16/318 • Number of events 19 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
5.6%
9/160 • Number of events 12 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
2.2%
7/318 • Number of events 9 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
2.5%
4/160 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection pseudomonas
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arteriovenous fistula occlusion
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pocket erosion
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic neck syndrome
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin abnormal
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Investigations
Clostridium test positive
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.9%
3/160 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.9%
3/160 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.9%
3/160 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cervical spinal stenosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gouty arthritis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in jaw
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gallbladder cancer
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to gastrointestinal tract
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm malignant
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar infarction
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cervical root pain
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dementia
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nerve compression
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.94%
3/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Obstructive uropathy
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal artery stenosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
1.9%
6/318 • Number of events 7 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
2.5%
8/318 • Number of events 9 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
3.8%
6/160 • Number of events 6 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Rectocele
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
1.6%
5/318 • Number of events 7 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
3.8%
6/160 • Number of events 11 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung infiltration
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary arterial hypertension
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Bladder neoplasm surgery
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Heart transplant
|
0.94%
3/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial occlusive disease
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial stenosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.94%
3/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive emergency
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.94%
3/318 • Number of events 3 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
1.3%
4/318 • Number of events 4 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
0.63%
2/318 • Number of events 2 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.31%
1/318 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.00%
0/160 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vena cava thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/318 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing
n=318 participants at risk
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status
|
Standard Biventricular Pacing
n=160 participants at risk
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
3.1%
10/318 • Number of events 10 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
8.8%
14/160 • Number of events 15 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
8.8%
28/318 • Number of events 33 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
8.8%
14/160 • Number of events 15 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
|
General disorders
Device stimulation issue
|
4.4%
14/318 • Number of events 17 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
6.2%
10/160 • Number of events 14 • From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months.
|
Additional Information
Adaptive CRT Clinical Research Specialist
Medtronic, Inc
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Generally, contracts allow investigators to publish study results per the protocol and publication plan. Investigators and Participating Institutions will provide any publication of Study Data generated by PI and/or Participating Institution to Medtronic for review prior to submission to determine if confidential information ("CI") is included and to check for technical correctness. Medtronic may not censor/interfere with the publication beyond the extent necessary to protect CI.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER