Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1377 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2012-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The hypotheses are: In comparison to the PCG, both the IG and the ACG are expected to have a higher motivation, to adopt a healthy lifestyle, to perform more health behavior and to be less likely to relapse into previous unhealthy routines. Also, IG and ACG will be healthier as well as they will report more quality of life and rehabilitation satisfaction. In comparison to ACG, the IG is hypothesized to be more effective than the ACG regarding motivation, behavior and social-cognitive predictors of behavior. Moreover, the interventions (ACG and IG) are supposed to be equally effective for cardiac and orthopedic, as well as out-patient and stationary treated rehabilitation patients. After successful evaluation and some adoptions the intervention will be implemented as a self-help program in all eligible rehabilitation clinics and in the internet.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group (IG)
Patients in the IG will receive an interactive, computerized expert system which tailors treatment components to the individual needs of the patients
Intervention Group (IG)
patients will receive an interactive, computerized expert system which tailors treatment components to the individual needs of the patients
Active Control Group (ACG)
Patients in the ACG will get an interactive computerized standard program which has been proven to be effective (Göhner, \& Fuchs, 2007) Göhner, W. \& Fuchs, R. (2007). Änderung des Gesundheitsverhaltens. MoVo-Gruppenprogramme für körperliche Aktivität und gesunde Ernährung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Active Control Group (ACG)
Patients in the ACG will get an interactive computerized standard program which has been proven to be effective (Göhner, W. \& Fuchs, R. (2007). Änderung des Gesundheitsverhaltens. MoVo-Gruppenprogramme für körperliche Aktivität und gesunde Ernährung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.)
Passive Control Group (PCG)
patients are asked to answer the questionnaires only
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention Group (IG)
patients will receive an interactive, computerized expert system which tailors treatment components to the individual needs of the patients
Active Control Group (ACG)
Patients in the ACG will get an interactive computerized standard program which has been proven to be effective (Göhner, W. \& Fuchs, R. (2007). Änderung des Gesundheitsverhaltens. MoVo-Gruppenprogramme für körperliche Aktivität und gesunde Ernährung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to fill out a questionnaire (no illiteracy)
* adequate German language ability
Exclusion Criteria
* severe cognitive deficits
* visual impairments (patients have to read at the PC)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deutsche Rentenversicherung
OTHER
Freie Universität Berlin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Freie Universität Berlin
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sonia Lippke, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Freie Universitaet Berlin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Freie Universitaet Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lippke S, Pomp S, Fleig L. Rehabilitants' conscientiousness as a moderator of the intention-planning-behavior chain. Rehabil Psychol. 2018 Aug;63(3):460-467. doi: 10.1037/rep0000210.
Fleig L, Kerschreiter R, Schwarzer R, Pomp S, Lippke S. 'Sticking to a healthy diet is easier for me when I exercise regularly': cognitive transfer between physical exercise and healthy nutrition. Psychol Health. 2014;29(12):1361-72. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.930146. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
Fleig L, Lippke S, Pomp S, Schwarzer R. Intervention effects of exercise self-regulation on physical exercise and eating fruits and vegetables: a longitudinal study in orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation. Prev Med. 2011 Sep;53(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.019. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0421/00-40-64-50-00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
8011 - 106 - 31/31.91
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id