Trial Outcomes & Findings for Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in Treating Patients With Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NCT NCT00979212)

NCT ID: NCT00979212

Last Updated: 2022-06-15

Results Overview

The assessment of whether mediastinal nodes which were involved at the time of study registration were clear of disease following induction chemoradiotherapy with or without panitumumab; the assessment is made at the time of surgery 4-6 weeks after chemoradiation. If surgery could not be performed, the patient was considered as not having had mediastinal nodal clearance.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

71 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From date of randomization to time of protocol surgery, approximately 12 weeks.

Results posted on

2022-06-15

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Induction CT+RT
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Overall Study
STARTED
24
47
Overall Study
COMPLETED
22
39
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
8

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Induction CT+RT
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
8
Overall Study
No protocol therapy received
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in Treating Patients With Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Total
n=61 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
61 years
n=5 Participants
61 years
n=7 Participants
61 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization to time of protocol surgery, approximately 12 weeks.

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

The assessment of whether mediastinal nodes which were involved at the time of study registration were clear of disease following induction chemoradiotherapy with or without panitumumab; the assessment is made at the time of surgery 4-6 weeks after chemoradiation. If surgery could not be performed, the patient was considered as not having had mediastinal nodal clearance.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Mediastinal Nodal Clearance After Completion of Induction Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Panitumumab.
68.2 percentage of participants
Interval 45.1 to 86.1
48.7 percentage of participants
Interval 32.4 to 65.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

Survival time was calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause or the date of last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival rates. One-year survival rates were estimated, not compared.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Overall Survival
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 66.6 to 99.2
89.1 percentage of participants
Interval 73.5 to 95.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study.

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

The first failure site will be tabulated, not compared.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Patterns of First Failure
Alive, no failure
15 participants
20 participants
Patterns of First Failure
Regional failure only
1 participants
2 participants
Patterns of First Failure
Dead, no failure
1 participants
3 participants
Patterns of First Failure
Distant failure only
4 participants
9 participants
Patterns of First Failure
Local and distant failure
1 participants
2 participants
Patterns of First Failure
Local and regional failure
0 participants
1 participants
Patterns of First Failure
Local, regional, and distant failure
0 participants
2 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study.

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. Does not include surgical morbidities. An acute adverse event is defined as any grade 3 or worse toxicity occurring during protocol treatment and within 30 days from the end of protocol treatment that is possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment. Acute adverse events are any adverse events occurring within 30 days of the end of all protocol treatment. Late adverse events are any adverse events occurring after 30 days after the end of all protocol treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Acute and Late Adverse Events
Acute
81.8 percentage of participants
Interval 59.7 to 94.8
69.2 percentage of participants
Interval 52.4 to 83.0
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Acute and Late Adverse Events
Late
30.3 percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 54.3
15.2 percentage of participants
Interval 5.1 to 31.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of surgery to 30 days following surgery.

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment and received protocol surgery

A surgical morbidity is any toxicity occurring within 30 days of protocol surgery, as evaluated using CTCAE v4.0. Rates of grade 3 and higher surgical morbidity were calculated; the rates across arms were not compared.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=19 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=30 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Surgical Morbidities in Patients With Resectable Disease at Reassessment
42.1 percentage of patients
Interval 20.3 to 66.5
20 percentage of patients
Interval 7.7 to 38.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study.

Population: FDG-PET/CT scan data was not obtained and therefore this outcome measure cannot be reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization to time of protocol surgery, approximately 12 weeks.

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

Patients are assessed for best response to protocol treatment using the RECIST criteria. The response rate was calculated as the number of patients who have a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of analyzable patients at completion of induction chemoradiation +/- panitumumab and prior to anticipated surgery in each arm. Patients without a documented assessment are considered as not having a CR or PR. Rates are not compared across arms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Response Rate
77.3 percentage of participants
Interval 54.6 to 92.2
61.5 percentage of participants
Interval 44.6 to 76.6

Adverse Events

Induction CT+RT

Serious events: 8 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab

Serious events: 20 serious events
Other events: 37 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 participants at risk
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=38 participants at risk
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhoidal hemorrhage
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Infusion related reaction
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Immune system disorders
Anaphylaxis
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Pleural infection
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative thoracic procedure complication
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Treatment related secondary malignancy
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders - Other
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial stricture
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchopleural fistula
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural hemorrhage
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary edema
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic event
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Induction CT+RT
n=22 participants at risk
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=38 participants at risk
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
59.1%
13/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
52.6%
20/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain - cardiac
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
22.7%
5/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
44.7%
17/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
18.4%
7/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
44.7%
17/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
36.4%
8/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
39.5%
15/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
59.1%
13/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
50.0%
19/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
18.4%
7/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Chills
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Fatigue
90.9%
20/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
78.9%
30/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Fever
22.7%
5/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
15.8%
6/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Flu like symptoms
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
General disorders
Pain
36.4%
8/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Infections and infestations - Other
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dermatitis radiation
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Creatinine increased
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
26.3%
10/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count increased
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
23.7%
9/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
45.5%
10/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
21.1%
8/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
Weight loss
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
54.5%
12/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
31.6%
12/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
59.1%
13/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose intolerance
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
36.4%
8/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
31.6%
12/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
18.4%
7/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
21.1%
8/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
23.7%
9/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chest wall pain
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Generalized muscle weakness
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
15.8%
6/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
22.7%
5/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
15.8%
6/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chylothorax
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
36.8%
14/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
72.7%
16/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
44.7%
17/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hoarseness
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
45.5%
10/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sore throat
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
31.6%
12/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
34.2%
13/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic event
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.

Additional Information

Wendy Seiferheld, M.S.

NRG Oncology

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI's are required to abide by the sponsor's publication guidelines which require review by coauthors and subsequent review and approval by the sponsor.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER