Trial Outcomes & Findings for Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in Treating Patients With Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NCT NCT00979212)
NCT ID: NCT00979212
Last Updated: 2022-06-15
Results Overview
The assessment of whether mediastinal nodes which were involved at the time of study registration were clear of disease following induction chemoradiotherapy with or without panitumumab; the assessment is made at the time of surgery 4-6 weeks after chemoradiation. If surgery could not be performed, the patient was considered as not having had mediastinal nodal clearance.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
71 participants
From date of randomization to time of protocol surgery, approximately 12 weeks.
2022-06-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
24
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
No protocol therapy received
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in Treating Patients With Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Total
n=61 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61 years
n=5 Participants
|
61 years
n=7 Participants
|
61 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization to time of protocol surgery, approximately 12 weeks.Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment
The assessment of whether mediastinal nodes which were involved at the time of study registration were clear of disease following induction chemoradiotherapy with or without panitumumab; the assessment is made at the time of surgery 4-6 weeks after chemoradiation. If surgery could not be performed, the patient was considered as not having had mediastinal nodal clearance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mediastinal Nodal Clearance After Completion of Induction Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Panitumumab.
|
68.2 percentage of participants
Interval 45.1 to 86.1
|
48.7 percentage of participants
Interval 32.4 to 65.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of studyPopulation: All eligible patients who started study treatment
Survival time was calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause or the date of last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival rates. One-year survival rates were estimated, not compared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 66.6 to 99.2
|
89.1 percentage of participants
Interval 73.5 to 95.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study.Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment
The first failure site will be tabulated, not compared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Alive, no failure
|
15 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Regional failure only
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Dead, no failure
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Distant failure only
|
4 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Local and distant failure
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Local and regional failure
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Patterns of First Failure
Local, regional, and distant failure
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study.Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment
Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. Does not include surgical morbidities. An acute adverse event is defined as any grade 3 or worse toxicity occurring during protocol treatment and within 30 days from the end of protocol treatment that is possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment. Acute adverse events are any adverse events occurring within 30 days of the end of all protocol treatment. Late adverse events are any adverse events occurring after 30 days after the end of all protocol treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Acute and Late Adverse Events
Acute
|
81.8 percentage of participants
Interval 59.7 to 94.8
|
69.2 percentage of participants
Interval 52.4 to 83.0
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Acute and Late Adverse Events
Late
|
30.3 percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 54.3
|
15.2 percentage of participants
Interval 5.1 to 31.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of surgery to 30 days following surgery.Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment and received protocol surgery
A surgical morbidity is any toxicity occurring within 30 days of protocol surgery, as evaluated using CTCAE v4.0. Rates of grade 3 and higher surgical morbidity were calculated; the rates across arms were not compared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=19 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=30 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Morbidities in Patients With Resectable Disease at Reassessment
|
42.1 percentage of patients
Interval 20.3 to 66.5
|
20 percentage of patients
Interval 7.7 to 38.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs at time of primary analysis, approximately five years from start of study.Population: FDG-PET/CT scan data was not obtained and therefore this outcome measure cannot be reported.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization to time of protocol surgery, approximately 12 weeks.Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment
Patients are assessed for best response to protocol treatment using the RECIST criteria. The response rate was calculated as the number of patients who have a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of analyzable patients at completion of induction chemoradiation +/- panitumumab and prior to anticipated surgery in each arm. Patients without a documented assessment are considered as not having a CR or PR. Rates are not compared across arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 Participants
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=39 Participants
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Response Rate
|
77.3 percentage of participants
Interval 54.6 to 92.2
|
61.5 percentage of participants
Interval 44.6 to 76.6
|
Adverse Events
Induction CT+RT
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 participants at risk
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=38 participants at risk
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhoidal hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion related reaction
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylaxis
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pleural infection
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative thoracic procedure complication
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Treatment related secondary malignancy
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders - Other
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial stricture
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchopleural fistula
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural hemorrhage
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
4.5%
1/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary edema
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
0.00%
0/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic event
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Induction CT+RT
n=22 participants at risk
Chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
Induction CT+RT+Panitumumab
n=38 participants at risk
Panitumumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus radiation therapy followed by surgery (if operable) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
59.1%
13/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
52.6%
20/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain - cardiac
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
22.7%
5/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
44.7%
17/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
18.4%
7/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
44.7%
17/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
|
36.4%
8/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
39.5%
15/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
59.1%
13/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
50.0%
19/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
18.4%
7/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
90.9%
20/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
78.9%
30/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
22.7%
5/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
15.8%
6/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Flu like symptoms
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
36.4%
8/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections and infestations - Other
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dermatitis radiation
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine increased
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
26.3%
10/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count increased
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
23.7%
9/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
45.5%
10/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
21.1%
8/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
Weight loss
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
|
54.5%
12/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
31.6%
12/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
59.1%
13/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose intolerance
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
36.4%
8/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
31.6%
12/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
18.4%
7/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
21.1%
8/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
23.7%
9/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
10.5%
4/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chest wall pain
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Generalized muscle weakness
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
15.8%
6/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
28.9%
11/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
22.7%
5/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
15.8%
6/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chylothorax
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
40.9%
9/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
36.8%
14/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
72.7%
16/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
44.7%
17/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hoarseness
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
45.5%
10/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
13.2%
5/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
31.8%
7/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
5.3%
2/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sore throat
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
27.3%
6/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
31.6%
12/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
13.6%
3/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
34.2%
13/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
2.6%
1/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
18.2%
4/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
7.9%
3/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic event
|
9.1%
2/22
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
0.00%
0/38
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event. Note, with yearly update of adverse events, eligibility determination of one patient changed and as a result the number at risk shown for adverse events now differs from the Participant Flow table which was entered previously.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI's are required to abide by the sponsor's publication guidelines which require review by coauthors and subsequent review and approval by the sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER