Trial Outcomes & Findings for 24-week Study Comparing Lixisenatide to Sitagliptin as add-on to Metformin in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients Younger Than 50 Years (NCT NCT00976937)
NCT ID: NCT00976937
Last Updated: 2016-10-11
Results Overview
Percentage of patients who met both criteria (HbA1c \<7% at Week 24 and at least 5% weight loss from baseline at Week 24) is reported. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
319 participants
Week 24
2016-10-11
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 92 centers in 13 countries between August 31, 2009 and March 19, 2011.
A total of 620 patients were screened of which 301 (48.5%) were screen failures; main reason for screen failure was glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values being out of the defined protocol range (greater than or equal to 7% and less than or equal to 10%). A total of 319 patients were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo: lixisenatide 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24 along with placebo matching to sitagliptin 100 milligram (mg) capsule orally QD up to Week 24.
|
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo: sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24 along with volume matching lixisenatide placebo 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
158
|
161
|
|
Overall Study
Treated/Safety Population
|
158
|
161
|
|
Overall Study
Modified Intent-to-Treat(mITT)Population
|
158
|
161
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
142
|
150
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo: lixisenatide 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24 along with placebo matching to sitagliptin 100 milligram (mg) capsule orally QD up to Week 24.
|
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo: sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24 along with volume matching lixisenatide placebo 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Poor compliance to protocol
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Personal and Familial Reason
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
24-week Study Comparing Lixisenatide to Sitagliptin as add-on to Metformin in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients Younger Than 50 Years
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=158 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo: lixisenatide 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24 along with placebo matching to sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo: sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24 along with volume matching lixisenatide placebo 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.
|
Total
n=319 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=5 Participants
|
43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=7 Participants
|
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Caucasian/White
|
132 participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 participants
n=7 Participants
|
259 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Black
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Asian/Oriental
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Other
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Hispanic
|
73 participants
n=5 Participants
|
72 participants
n=7 Participants
|
145 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Non Hispanic
|
85 participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 participants
n=7 Participants
|
174 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
8.16 percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89 • n=5 Participants
|
8.09 percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 • n=7 Participants
|
8.12 percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
36.76 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25 • n=5 Participants
|
36.76 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.34 • n=7 Participants
|
36.76 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.80 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of Diabetes
|
4.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.86 • n=5 Participants
|
4.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.56 • n=7 Participants
|
4.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.70 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Weight
|
98.51 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.48 • n=5 Participants
|
100.56 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.77 • n=7 Participants
|
99.55 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.61 • n=5 Participants
|
|
2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG)
|
13.77 millimole per liter (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.78 • n=5 Participants
|
13.92 millimole per liter (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.99 • n=7 Participants
|
13.84 millimole per liter (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
9.09 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.60 • n=5 Participants
|
8.96 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59 • n=7 Participants
|
9.03 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Glucose Excursion
|
4.37 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.64 • n=5 Participants
|
4.48 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59 • n=7 Participants
|
4.42 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI)
|
108.56 picomole/liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 82.03 • n=5 Participants
|
106.99 picomole/liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 82.69 • n=7 Participants
|
107.76 picomole/liter (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 82.23 • n=5 Participants
|
|
2-hour Postprandial Plasma Insulin
|
424.67 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 350.96 • n=5 Participants
|
420.45 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 302.17 • n=7 Participants
|
422.56 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 327.02 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting C-Peptide
|
1.19 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.51 • n=5 Participants
|
1.20 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.52 • n=7 Participants
|
1.20 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.52 • n=5 Participants
|
|
2-hour Postprandial C-peptide
|
2.79 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.28 • n=5 Participants
|
2.92 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35 • n=7 Participants
|
2.86 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.32 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting Glucagon
|
59.12 nanogram/liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.81 • n=5 Participants
|
59.43 nanogram/liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.53 • n=7 Participants
|
59.28 nanogram/liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.32 • n=5 Participants
|
|
2-hour Postprandial Glucagon
|
66.36 ng/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.58 • n=5 Participants
|
67.72 ng/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.77 • n=7 Participants
|
67.04 ng/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.05 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting Proinsulin
|
45.06 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.50 • n=5 Participants
|
44.62 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.42 • n=7 Participants
|
44.83 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.91 • n=5 Participants
|
|
2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin
|
105.50 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 75.38 • n=5 Participants
|
105.51 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 74.00 • n=7 Participants
|
105.51 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 74.57 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting Proinsulin-to-Insulin Ratio
|
0.53 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.70 • n=5 Participants
|
0.59 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73 • n=7 Participants
|
0.56 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71 • n=5 Participants
|
|
2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin-to-Insulin Ratio
|
0.36 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.53 • n=5 Participants
|
0.32 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24 • n=7 Participants
|
0.34 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
|
6.30 milliunit * mmol /liter^2(mU * mmol/L^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.08 • n=5 Participants
|
6.26 milliunit * mmol /liter^2(mU * mmol/L^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.32 • n=7 Participants
|
6.28 milliunit * mmol /liter^2(mU * mmol/L^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.20 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-beta)
|
62.01 percentage of normal beta cells function
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.78 • n=5 Participants
|
60.74 percentage of normal beta cells function
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.80 • n=7 Participants
|
61.36 percentage of normal beta cells function
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.29 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: mITT population included randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using Last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Percentage of patients who met both criteria (HbA1c \<7% at Week 24 and at least 5% weight loss from baseline at Week 24) is reported. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=158 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% and at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
7.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed=patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=150 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=160 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24
|
-0.66 percentage of hemoglobin
Standard Error 0.094
|
-0.72 percentage of hemoglobin
Standard Error 0.097
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline body weight assessment during on-treatment period.
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=152 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=160 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
|
-2.51 kilogram
Standard Error 0.294
|
-1.17 kilogram
Standard Error 0.304
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline 2-hour PPG assessment during on-treatment period.
The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=129 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=139 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24
|
-3.35 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.377
|
-1.44 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.384
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FPG assessment during on-treatment period.
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=153 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
|
-0.45 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.193
|
-0.69 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.198
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline glucose excursion assessment during on-treatment period.
Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=127 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=139 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24
|
-2.55 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.272
|
-0.42 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.275
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline plasma insulin assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category.
Change was calculated for fasting plasma insulin and 2-hour post prandial plasma insulin by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=123 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=133 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) and 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Insulin (PPI) at Week 24
FPI (n=119, 133)
|
-1.70 pmol/L
Standard Error 6.789
|
-0.88 pmol/L
Standard Error 7.020
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) and 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Insulin (PPI) at Week 24
2-hour PPI (n=123, 130)
|
-57.81 pmol/L
Standard Error 22.788
|
-2.85 pmol/L
Standard Error 23.309
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline C-peptide assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category.
Change was calculated for fasting C-peptide and 2-hour postprandial C-peptide by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=125 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=139 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide and 2-hour Postprandial C-peptide at Week 24
Fasting C-peptide (n= 123,139)
|
-0.02 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.039
|
-0.02 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.038
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide and 2-hour Postprandial C-peptide at Week 24
2-hour postprandial C-peptide (n=125, 139)
|
-0.15 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.100
|
0.08 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.101
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline glucagon assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category.
Change was calculated for fasting glucagon and 2-hour postprandial glucagon by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=124 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=138 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon and 2-hour Postprandial Glucagon at Week 24
Fasting Glucagon (n=124, 138)
|
1.89 ng/L
Standard Error 1.667
|
3.52 ng/L
Standard Error 1.661
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon and 2-hour Postprandial Glucagon at Week 24
2-hour postprandial Glucagon (n=124, 134)
|
-8.16 ng/L
Standard Error 1.801
|
-4.38 ng/L
Standard Error 1.824
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline proinsulin assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category.
Change was calculated for fasting proinsulin and 2-hour postprandial proinsulin by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of the study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=125 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=140 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin at Week 24
Fasting Proinsulin (n=125, 140)
|
-2.18 pmol/L
Standard Error 3.172
|
-4.84 pmol/L
Standard Error 3.154
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin at Week 24
2-hour postprandial Proinsulin (n=125, 139)
|
0.28 pmol/L
Standard Error 6.502
|
-3.95 pmol/L
Standard Error 6.477
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HOMA-IR assessment during on-treatment period.
HOMA-IR was derived from FPG and FPI as: (FPI \[micro units per milliliter\]\*FPG \[mmol/L\]) divided by 22.5. Change was calculated for HOMA-IR by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=118 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=133 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) at Week 24
|
-0.52 mU * mmol/L^2
Standard Error 0.366
|
-0.57 mU * mmol/L^2
Standard Error 0.378
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HOMA-beta assessment during on-treatment period.
HOMA-beta was derived from FPG and FPI as: (20\*FPI \[micro units/milliliter\]) divided by (FPG \[mmol/L\] minus 3.5). Change was calculated for HOMA-beta by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=118 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=133 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment-Beta (HOMA-beta) at Week 24
|
17.66 percentage of normal beta cells function
Standard Error 9.652
|
17.79 percentage of normal beta cells function
Standard Error 9.958
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: mITT population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=150 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=160 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24
|
24.0 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24Population: mITT population.
Routine fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG \>270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8.5%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=158 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-Week Period
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: mITT population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=150 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=160 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24
|
40.7 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline body weight assessment during on-treatment period.
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=152 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=160 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24
|
18.4 percentage of participants
|
11.9 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline proinsulin-to-insulin ratio assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category.
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=123 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=133 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio at Week 24
Fasting Proinsulin-to-insulin ratio (n=119, 133)
|
-0.08 ratio
Standard Error 0.035
|
-0.17 ratio
Standard Error 0.036
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio at Week 24
2-hour PP Proinsulin-to-insulin ratio (n=123, 130)
|
-0.01 ratio
Standard Error 0.025
|
-0.05 ratio
Standard Error 0.026
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administrationPopulation: Safety population included all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=158 Participants
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 Participants
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Symptomatic hypoglycemia
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Lixisenatide
Sitagliptin
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=158 participants at risk
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 participants at risk
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.00%
0/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
0.62%
1/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.63%
1/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
0.00%
0/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriovenous fistula
|
0.63%
1/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
0.00%
0/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
0.00%
0/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
0.62%
1/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.63%
1/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
0.00%
0/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
0.62%
1/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Lixisenatide
n=158 participants at risk
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo.
|
Sitagliptin
n=161 participants at risk
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
5.1%
8/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
3.1%
5/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.3%
10/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
7.5%
12/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.1%
8/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
3.1%
5/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.7%
20/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
9.3%
15/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.9%
14/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
7.5%
12/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
17.7%
28/158 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
6.8%
11/161 • First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If no publication has occurred within 12 months of the completion of the study, the Investigator shall have the right to publish/present independently the results of the study. The Investigator shall provide the Sponsor with a copy of any such presentation/publication for comment at least 30 days before any presentation/submission for publication. If requested by the Sponsor, any presentation/submission shall be delayed up to 90 days, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER