Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of TRI476 (Oxcarbazepine) in Children With Inadequately Controlled Partial Onset Seizures (NCT NCT00975715)
NCT ID: NCT00975715
Last Updated: 2014-07-16
Results Overview
Percent change in partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase from the screening phase, was calculated according to the following formula: "Percent change in partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days from the screening phase" = (partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase - partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the screening phase) / partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase x 100 "Partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days" = Number of partial onset seizures during each phase (screening phase or double-blind phase) / number of days during the screening or double-blind phase × 28.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
99 participants
screening and 28 days
2014-07-16
Participant Flow
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded. A total of 48 participants were randomized to TRI476 and 51 to placebo. 7 participants discontinued during the titration period and 3 discontinued during the maintenance period. A total of 89 participants completed the study.
Participants kept same dosage of their traditional antiepileptics prior to screening and throughout the study. They received TRI476 or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. TRI476 dose was increased gradually, based on body weight during the titration period (day 0- 14). The tolerated dose was given during the maintenance period (up to day 56).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TRI476
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Titration Period
STARTED
|
48
|
51
|
|
Titration Period
COMPLETED
|
41
|
51
|
|
Titration Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period
STARTED
|
41
|
51
|
|
Maintenance Period
COMPLETED
|
39
|
50
|
|
Maintenance Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
TRI476
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Titration Period
Adverse Event
|
6
|
0
|
|
Titration Period
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of TRI476 (Oxcarbazepine) in Children With Inadequately Controlled Partial Onset Seizures
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TRI476
n=48 Participants
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Total
n=99 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
9.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.91 • n=93 Participants
|
9.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83 • n=4 Participants
|
9.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.87 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: screening and 28 daysPopulation: The Full Analysis set included all participants who received study drug.
Percent change in partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase from the screening phase, was calculated according to the following formula: "Percent change in partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days from the screening phase" = (partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase - partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the screening phase) / partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase x 100 "Partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days" = Number of partial onset seizures during each phase (screening phase or double-blind phase) / number of days during the screening or double-blind phase × 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 Participants
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Partial Onset Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days From Baseline to the Double-blind Phase, by Treatment Group
|
-2.85 percentage change per 28 days
Standard Deviation 63.546
|
14.82 percentage change per 28 days
Standard Deviation 73.333
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 28 days and 56 daysPopulation: The Full Analysis set included all participants who received study drug.
Partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days during a period between baseline and Week 4 was measured. Partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days (count/28 days)" = Number of partial onset seizures during each phase (screening phase or double-blind phase) / Number of days during the phase x 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 Participants
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Partial Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days, by Study Period (Every 28 Days) and Treatment Group
Baseline to Week 4 (day 0 to day 28)
|
65.58 seizures per 28 days
Standard Deviation 109.457
|
90.61 seizures per 28 days
Standard Deviation 283.187
|
|
Partial Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days, by Study Period (Every 28 Days) and Treatment Group
Week 4 to Week 8 (day 28 to day 56)
|
45.40 seizures per 28 days
Standard Deviation 70.209
|
98.73 seizures per 28 days
Standard Deviation 291.781
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: screening to 28 daysPopulation: The Full Analysis set included all participants who received study drug.
Responder rate was defined as the percent of participants with an at least 50% reduction in partial onset seizure frequency per 28 days from the screening phase.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 Participants
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Response During Double-blind Phase, by Treatment Group
|
23.4 percentage of participants
|
3.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 28 daysPopulation: Analyzed set includes all participants who received study drug and had both baseline and post baseline data available.
Percent change in seizure frequency from baseline = 100 (T-B)/B, B=Seizure frequency per 28 days during baseline phase, T=Seizure frequency per 28 days during the double-blind phase. Seizure frequency per 28 days is calculated as: (seizure frequency during the double-blind phase / the number of days the seizure information were provided) x 28. Only patients with both baseline and corresponding post-baseline values are included.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 Participants
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Partial Onset Seizure Frequency During the Double-blind Phase by Seizure Type
Simple partial seizures
|
-9.73 percentage change in seizure frequency
Standard Deviation 51.329
|
-16.89 percentage change in seizure frequency
Standard Deviation 45.822
|
|
Percent Change in Partial Onset Seizure Frequency During the Double-blind Phase by Seizure Type
Complex partial seizures
|
-6.86 percentage change in seizure frequency
Standard Deviation 78.583
|
30.59 percentage change in seizure frequency
Standard Deviation 91.551
|
|
Percent Change in Partial Onset Seizure Frequency During the Double-blind Phase by Seizure Type
Secondarily generalized seizures
|
-29.54 percentage change in seizure frequency
Standard Deviation 64.660
|
12.11 percentage change in seizure frequency
Standard Deviation 82.879
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 56 daysPopulation: The Analysis set included all participants who received study drug and had data available for analysis.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI) is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill patients). CGI-C scores range from 1 (very much improved) through to 7 (very much worse).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 Participants
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
Marked improvement
|
9 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
Moderate improvement
|
8 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
Slight improvement
|
8 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
No change
|
21 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
Slight aggravation
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
Moderate aggravation
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Final Assessment, by Treatment Group
Marked aggravation
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
TRI476
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 participants at risk
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 participants at risk
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
2.0%
1/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
2.1%
1/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
TRI476
n=47 participants at risk
Participants received TRI476 based on body weight with titration up to the maintenance dose, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
Placebo
n=51 participants at risk
Participants received placebo to TRI476 without any adjustment to the dosing regimen, in addition to their traditional antiepileptics dosage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
3.9%
2/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
6.4%
3/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
5.9%
3/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
10.6%
5/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
5.9%
3/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
3.9%
2/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.1%
1/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
3.9%
2/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
5.9%
3/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.6%
5/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
17.6%
9/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.5%
4/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
9.8%
5/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
0.00%
0/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
42.6%
20/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
9.8%
5/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
3.9%
2/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
2.0%
1/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
4.3%
2/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
3.9%
2/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
8.5%
4/47
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
3.9%
2/51
A total of 99 patients were randomized, one patient who did not receive study drug was excluded from the safety analysis set
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER