Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Performance Comparison of Two Contact Lenses (NCT NCT00975585)
NCT ID: NCT00975585
Last Updated: 2018-06-19
Results Overview
The overall score is the average of the total scores of each of five regions of the cornea. The minimum average score is 0 and the maximum average score is 3. Corneal surface abnormality as indicated by the severity of staining over five regions of the cornea (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal) was assessed by the investigator using the following scale: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
COMPLETED
NA
379 participants
2 weeks
2018-06-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
184
|
195
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
177
|
183
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lens issue
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Performance Comparison of Two Contact Lenses
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=184 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=195 Participants
contact lens
|
Total
n=379 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
29.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=5 Participants
|
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=7 Participants
|
29.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
261 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
184 participants
n=5 Participants
|
195 participants
n=7 Participants
|
379 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: Analysis included all subjects that completed the study.
The overall score is the average of the total scores of each of five regions of the cornea. The minimum average score is 0 and the maximum average score is 3. Corneal surface abnormality as indicated by the severity of staining over five regions of the cornea (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal) was assessed by the investigator using the following scale: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=177 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Corneal Staining
|
0.157 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.018
|
0.170 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.018
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksVisual acuity was assessed by the investigator using the Snellen chart and converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). logMAR ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen visual acuity. logMAR values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=177 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Acuity
|
-0.012 logMAR units
Standard Error 0.003
|
-0.002 logMAR units
Standard Error 0.003
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: Analysis includes subjects that completed the study.
After two weeks of wear, subjects responded to a phone survey question regarding overall comfort of the study contact lenses (senofilcon A and lotrafilcon B) using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=177 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Comfort
|
3.938 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.090
|
3.536 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeks and 4 weeksPopulation: Analysis includes all subjects that completed the study.
After four weeks of wear, subjects responded to a phone survey question regarding overall comfort of the study contact lenses (lotrafilcon B)using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Comfort
|
3.534 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.111
|
3.436 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.118
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: Analysis includes subjects that completed the study.
The investigator assessed limbal redness using the following scale: 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=177 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Limbal Redness
|
0.376 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
|
0.499 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.030
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: Analysis includes subjects that completed the study.
The investigator assessed bulbar redness using the following scale: 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=177 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bulbar Redness
|
0.465 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
|
0.532 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.030
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: Analysis includes subjects that completed the study.
Subjects responded to a phone survey question regarding the frequency of the sensation of dryness while wearing the study contact lenses using the following scale: 1=Extreme, 2=Moderate, 3=Slight, 4=None
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A
n=177 Participants
contact lens
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=183 Participants
contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Symptoms of Dryness
|
2.003 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
2.414 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
Adverse Events
Senofilcon A
Lotrafilcon B
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Sheila Hickson-Curran, MCOptom/ Director, Medical Affairs
Vistakon
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Prior to submission for publication or presentation, the PI will provide SPONSOR with at least sixty (60) days for review of a manuscript. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no paper that incorporates SPONSOR Confidential Information will be submitted for publication without SPONSOR's prior written consent. If requested in writing, the PI will withhold such publication for up to an additional sixty (60) days to allow for filing of a patent application.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER