Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infections (OVIVA B&J)

NCT ID: NCT00974493

Last Updated: 2020-06-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1054 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will compare the outcomes of treating bone and joint infections with 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics with 6 weeks of oral antibiotic treatment. The trial is of antibiotic "strategy" rather than of individual antibiotics. The study will be open label, but the primary outcome will be proven failure of infection treatment, determined by pre-established objective criteria for treatment failure. The null hypothesis tested is that there will be no difference in treatment failure rates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A long course of antibiotic therapy given by a "drip" (i.e. intravenous) is recommended treatment for many serious bacterial infections. It is costly and inconvenient for the patient to remain hospitalised for therapy, so outpatient antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programmes have been established in many countries to deliver intravenous antibiotics safely and conveniently. The majority of patients referred to OPAT programmes have bone and joint infections. However, there is no clear evidence that bone and joint infection really require long courses of intravenous antibiotics rather than oral antibiotics.

We will compare the outcome of treatment with intravenous versus oral antibiotic therapy for patients with bone and joint infection. The choice of antibiotic is complex, and antibiotics that are suitable oral choices are often not suitable intravenous choices and vice versa. Subjects will therefore be randomized to an oral or intravenous "strategy," rather than to individual antibiotics. Outcomes will be determined by pre-established objective criteria for treatment failure.

We have conducted a pilot study in one centre (Oxford), recruiting approximately 200 patients, and are now expanding to include multi-centre recruitment in the UK, aiming to recruit 1050 patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Infection Joint Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral antibiotics

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antibiotics

Intervention Type DRUG

The trial protocol does not specify individual antibiotics, as the trial question is one of strategy (i.e. oral vs intravenous route) rather than individual antibiotics.

Within allocated strategy (i.e. oral or intravenous) antibiotics will be selected by a clinician with reference to the subject's clinical condition, microbiological data and local guidelines.

Intravenous antibiotics

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antibiotics

Intervention Type DRUG

The trial protocol does not specify individual antibiotics, as the trial question is one of strategy (i.e. oral vs intravenous route) rather than individual antibiotics.

Within allocated strategy (i.e. oral or intravenous) antibiotics will be selected by a clinician with reference to the subject's clinical condition, microbiological data and local guidelines.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Antibiotics

The trial protocol does not specify individual antibiotics, as the trial question is one of strategy (i.e. oral vs intravenous route) rather than individual antibiotics.

Within allocated strategy (i.e. oral or intravenous) antibiotics will be selected by a clinician with reference to the subject's clinical condition, microbiological data and local guidelines.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Individual antibiotics not specified by protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. Has a bone and joint infection one of the following categories;

1. Native osteomyelitis.
2. Native joint septic arthritis.
3. Diabetic foot infection with osteomyelitis.
4. Prosthetic joint associated infection.
5. Discitis/ spinal osteomyelitis/ epidural abscess
* Has had at least 48 hours, but not more than 7 days, of IV antibiotic therapy already given after definitive surgical management.
* Has a clinical diagnosis of bacterial infection (caused by any organism excepting mycobacteria).
* Is clinically stable in the opinion of the study clinicians, has no further interventions to treat acute infection required or planned.

Exclusion Criteria

* Has Staph aureus bacteraemia.
* Has suspected bacterial endocarditis.
* Has suspected mediastinal infection.
* Has suspected central nervous system infection.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Matthew Scarborough

Primary Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philip Bejon, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Trust

Matthew Scarborough, MB BS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oxford University Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Trust

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OVIVA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.