Trial Outcomes & Findings for MOM Program 8-Year Follow-up (NCT NCT00970853)
NCT ID: NCT00970853
Last Updated: 2014-04-15
Results Overview
The WJR-III, Cog measures intelligence and cognition in children and offers a recent standardization sample and updated item content. The WJR-III, Cog was selected because it includes verbal, nonverbal, and language scales and its recent standardization sample includes an appropriate proportion of children from ethnic minority, limited parent education, and Northeastern U.S. regional families.The mean test score is 100, with a standard deviation of 15. The test yields scores from 55 (worst score) to 145 (best score).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
187 participants
8 years post original enrollment in study
2014-04-15
Participant Flow
Mothers from high poverty areas with singleton healthy infants weighing at least 2500g with no genetic or developmental disorders were recruited from post-partum unit of an academic hospital. At child age 8-years mothers were contacted for an in office follow-up visit. 187 of 253 eligible mothers participated.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
89
|
98
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
89
|
98
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
MOM Program 8-Year Follow-up
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
Total
n=187 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
89 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
187 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
7.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION .12 • n=93 Participants
|
7.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION .13 • n=4 Participants
|
7.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION .12 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
51 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
38 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
89 participants
n=93 Participants
|
98 participants
n=4 Participants
|
187 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years post original enrollment in studyPopulation: All were included.
The WJR-III, Cog measures intelligence and cognition in children and offers a recent standardization sample and updated item content. The WJR-III, Cog was selected because it includes verbal, nonverbal, and language scales and its recent standardization sample includes an appropriate proportion of children from ethnic minority, limited parent education, and Northeastern U.S. regional families.The mean test score is 100, with a standard deviation of 15. The test yields scores from 55 (worst score) to 145 (best score).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Ability Test, 3rd Edition (WJR-III, Cog)
|
89.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.32
|
87.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe WJR-III, Ach, Broad Reading measures reading achievement in children and offers a recent standardization sample and updated item content. The WJR-III, Ach, Broad Reading was selected because it includes indices of reading and a recent standardization sample that includes an appropriate proportion of children from ethnic minority, limited parent education, and Northeastern U.S. regional families.The mean test score is 100, with a standard deviation of 15. The test yields scores from 55 (worst score) to 145 (best score).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Woodcock-Johnson Academic Ability Test, 3rd Edition (WJR-III, Ach), Broad Reading
|
90.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.19
|
90.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe WJR-III, Ach, Broad Math measures math academic achievement in children and offers a recent standardization sample and updated item content. The WJR-III, Ach, Math was selected because its recent standardization sample includes an appropriate proportion of children from ethnic minority, limited parent education, and Northeastern U.S. regional families. The mean test score is 100, with a standard deviation of 15. The test yields scores from 55 (worst score) to 145 (best score).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Woodcock-Johnson Academic Ability Test, 3rd Edition (WJR-III, Ach), Broad Math
|
94.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.37
|
90.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe CBCL is part of The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA)that measures a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and social behaviors. The CBCL is administered in interview format and respondents are asked to rate 112 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child", based on the past two months. The raw scores from the 112 items are then compared with age- and gender-matched controls from the standardization sample, and standard scores are then derived with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Worst value is 80; best value is 30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Internalizing
|
50.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
49.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe CBCL is part of The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA)that measures a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and social behaviors. The CBCL is administered in interview format and respondents are asked to rate 112 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child", based on the past two months. The raw scores from the 112 items are then compared with age- and gender-matched controls from the standardization sample, and standard scores are derived with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The worst possible score is 80 and the best possible score is 30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Externalizing
|
54.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.76
|
53.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe CBCL is part of The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA)that measures a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and social behaviors. The CBCL is administered in interview format and respondents are asked to rate 112 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child", based on the past two months. The raw scores from the 112 items are then compared with age- and gender-matched controls from the standardization sample, and standard scores are derived with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Worst score is 80; best score is 30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL),Total Problems
|
53.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.20
|
51.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe TRF is the companion to the CBCL and is completed by the child's teacher. The TRF measures a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and social functioning. The TRF asks teachers to rate problem behaviors and questions about receipt of educational services. Respondents are asked to rate 112 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child", based on the past two months. The raw scores from the 112 items are then compared with scores from age- and gender-matched controls from the standardization sample, and standard scores are derived with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. value is 80; best value is 30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Teacher Rating Form (TRF), Internalizing
|
48.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.63
|
49.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe TRF is the companion to the CBCL and is completed by the child's teacher. The TRF measures a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and social functioning. The TRF asks teachers to rate problem behaviors and questions about receipt of educational services. Respondents are asked to rate 112 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child", based on the past two months. The raw scores from the 112 items are then compared with age- and gender-matched controls from the standardization sample, and standard scores are derived with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Best score is 30; worst score is 80.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Teacher Rating Form (TRF), Externalizing
|
55.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.86
|
54.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 years from study entryThe TRF is the companion to the CBCL and is completed by the child's teacher. The TRF measures a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and social functioning. The TRF asks teachers to rate problem behaviors and questions about receipt of educational services. Respondents are asked to rate 112 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child", based on the past two months. The raw scores from the 112 items are then compared with age- and gender-matched controls from the standardization sample, and standard scores are derived with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Best score is 30; worst score is 80.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=89 Participants
Control group
|
MOM Program Home Visiting
n=98 Participants
Mixed professional support home visiting program.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Teacher Rating Form (TRF), Total Problems
|
53.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.17
|
52.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.69
|
Adverse Events
Control
MOM Program Home Visiting
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Jerilynn Radcliffe
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place