Trial Outcomes & Findings for Procedural Success and Safety of the Nit-Occlud® Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure Device and Its Application System (NCT NCT00968032)
NCT ID: NCT00968032
Last Updated: 2011-06-02
Results Overview
The implantation of the device under investigation in a single patient is defined as successful if delivery, placement and release of the device in a stable position is successful. The value will be compared to the number of patient enrolled.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
6 weeks ± 2 weeks
2011-06-02
Participant Flow
The recruitment period was set between June 2009 and July 2010 at a single medical clinic.
No enrolled participants were excluded from the trial.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Nit-Occlud® PFO Implantation Group
Patients suffering from PFO and suitable for closure of the defect with the Nit-Occlud® PFO Closure Device
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
63
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
61
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Procedural Success and Safety of the Nit-Occlud® Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure Device and Its Application System
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Nit-Occlud® PFO
n=63 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks ± 2 weeksThe implantation of the device under investigation in a single patient is defined as successful if delivery, placement and release of the device in a stable position is successful. The value will be compared to the number of patient enrolled.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nit-Occlud® PFO
n=63 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Successful Implantation.
|
62 participants
|
Adverse Events
Nit-Occlud® PFO
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Nit-Occlud® PFO
n=63 participants at risk
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac General
|
7.9%
5/63 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurology
|
6.3%
4/63 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrhythmia
|
4.8%
3/63 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
|
General disorders
Constitutional Symptoms
|
4.8%
3/63 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary/Upper respiratory
|
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other
|
3.2%
2/63 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were observed for each patient during a 6 week FU period (6 weeks +- 2 weeks). Adverse events were judged by the relationship to the investigational device
No AE led to discontinuation of the study. Causal relationship to the device was not ruled out in 19 AEs. Within these, for 15 AEs the relationship was recorded as unknown, 2 AEs were recorded as possibly related, and 2 AEs were recorded as related. All device related AEs were reported as of mild intensity.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place