Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-03-31
2011-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To safeguard against problems that might result, if intraosseous infusion fails to improve engraftment in this trial, the investigators will integrate a recently introduced strategy proven to improve engraftment-the transplantation of two cord blood units. Transplanting two unrelated cord blood units by intravenous infusion has been shown to improve engraftment (although there is still room for improvement). In this trial one unit will be injected intraosseously and the other unit will be infused intravenously.
This study is being conducted as a forerunner to a larger, multi-center trial. The investigators intend to enroll five patients over 1-2 years.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the past ten years unrelated cord blood transplantation has become an accepted alternative to bone marrow transplantation. African-Americans and other minorities, who are underrepresented in the National Marrow Donor Program, have benefited particularly from this. In infants and young children cord blood transplantation appears to be as effective as bone marrow transplantation. In older children, adolescents and adults, however, cord blood transplantation has not been as effective, primarily because most cord blood units provide an insufficient number of cells to ensure prompt and reliable engraftment ("taking" of the transplanted cells in the recipient's bone marrow).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Receive two cord blood units. One administered by intraosseous infusion and the other by intravenous infusion. The second unit is being given as a safeguard, but will also allow the researchers to directly compare engraftment between intravenously and intraosseously infused cord blood units.
cord blood infusion
Receive two cord blood units. One administered by intraosseous infusion and the other by intravenous infusion. The second unit is being given as a safeguard, but will also allow the researchers to directly compare engraftment between intravenously and intraosseously infused cord blood units.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cord blood infusion
Receive two cord blood units. One administered by intraosseous infusion and the other by intravenous infusion. The second unit is being given as a safeguard, but will also allow the researchers to directly compare engraftment between intravenously and intraosseously infused cord blood units.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. No prior autologous or allogeneic transplant
3. Karnofsky performance score or Lansky Play-Performance of at least 80
Exclusion Criteria
2. creatinine clearance or nuclear medicine GFR of \< 50 mL/min
3. cardiac ejection fraction \< 50%
4. bilirubin \> 2 × upper limit of normal or ALT \> 4 × upper limit of normal or unresolved veno-occlusive disease
5. Pulmonary carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO), adjusted for Hgb \< 50%
6. Karnofsky performance score or Lansky Play-Performance Scale \<80
7. Uncontrolled viral, bacterial, or fungal infection at the time of study enrollment
8. Seropositive for HIV
9. Availability of a willing and well HLA matched related (genotypically identical or mismatched at a single allele or antigen defined by typing at HLA A, B, C and DRB1 loci) donor
10. Availability of a willing and well HLA matched unrelated (allele matched or mismatched at a single allele defined by allele level typing for HLA A, B, C and DRB1 loci) adult blood or marrow donor
11. Availability of an umbilical cord blood unit, which provides at least a 4/6 HLA match as defined above and ≥ 5.0 \* 107 NC/Kg (cryopreserved)
36 Months
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Horan
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Horan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Intraosseous Infusion
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00000113
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id