Anxiety and Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Children

NCT ID: NCT00962039

Last Updated: 2020-06-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to determine whether citalopram is a useful, well-tolerated, and safe treatment for children and adolescents ages 7 to 18 years with functional abdominal pain. The study hypothesis is that citalopram will be better than placebo in producing clinical improvement and reductions in abdominal pain. It is also hypothesized that citalopram and placebo will not differ in terms of safety and tolerability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to determine the relative efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the citalopram in the treatment of pediatric functional recurrent abdominal pain (FAP) in children and adolescents ages 7 to 18 years, inclusive. The goal is to recruit and randomize 100 subjects to citalopram or placebo. Secondary aims include to determine if citalopram is superior to placebo in reducing comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents with FAP, to explore potential mediators (i.e., anxiety, depression) and moderators (e.g., age, gender, referral from primary or specialty care) of treatment response, and to explore the durability and tolerability of citalopram treatment 18 weeks following completion of the double-blind treatment phase with the goal of generating data useful to the development of future studies. The study is novel in conducting recruitment, assessment, and treatment in traditional medical settings. Limited exclusion criteria and the delivery of study assessments and interventions within routine practice settings provide for considerably greater external validity than the typical efficacy study.

Study hypotheses:

1. Citalopram will be superior to placebo in producing clinical improvement and reductions in abdominal pain.
2. Citalopram and placebo will not differ in tolerability or safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdominal Pain Anxiety

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Citalopram

Citalopram was initiated at 10 mg daily for one week, with dosage increased to 20 mg daily during week 2, with an optional increase to 40 mg daily at week 4 or thereafter if response was judged to be suboptimal (CGI-I or CGI-S \> 2).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Citalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects.

Placebo

Placebo administered in capsules identical to those containing citalopram using microcrystalline cellulose.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Citalopram

Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Celexa

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 3 episodes of abdominal pain during the previous 3 months associated with functional impairment in the absence of explanatory physical disease following clinically appropriate medical assessment.
* Age 7 years 0 months to 18 years 11 months, inclusive, at initial evaluation.
* Significant global functional impairment as reflected by a score less than 70 on the Children's Global Assessment Scale
* Residing with a primary caretaker (i.e., parent, legal guardian, relative functioning as a parent, or foster parent) who has known the child well for at least 6 months prior to study entry and has legal authority to consent to participation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Physical disease sufficient to explain the subjective distress and functional impairment suffered by the subject.
* FAP with atypical features:

1. Abnormal abdominal or rectal examination
2. GI bleeding (i.e., hematest positive stool or hematemesis)
3. History of recurrent or persistent fever associated with the abdominal pain
4. Involuntary weight loss (\> 5% of body weight) over the previous 3 months
5. Previous laboratory evidence suggesting explanatory physical disease
6. Persistent nighttime awakenings due to abdominal pain (at least once per week and \> 4 per month)
7. Persistent or bilious vomiting (at least once per week and \> 4 per month)
8. Abdominal pain exclusively associated with menstruation
9. Dysuria
* Physical disease in which citalopram monotherapy or study participation might prove to be disadvantageous or incompatible with quality care, including bleeding disorder characterized by prolonged bleeding time, uncontrolled epilepsy, or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
* Psychiatric problem or disorder in which citalopram monotherapy or study participation might prove to be disadvantageous or incompatible with quality care, including evidence that the child is a serious acute danger to self or others, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, alcohol or substance abuse/dependence, or bipolar disorder.
* History of mental retardation as defined by full scale IQ \< 70 on previous testing or participation in special education placement for mild to severe mental retardation.
* Inadequate English speaking abilities of child or parent(s) to complete study measures and/or communicate with study examiners.
* Adequate prior trial of citalopram, escitalopram, or another selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine. Adequate trial is defined as at least 4 weeks of citalopram 20 mg/day, escitalopram 10 mg/day, fluoxetine 20 mg/day, fluvoxamine 100 mg/day, paroxetine 20 mg/day, sertraline 50 mg/day, or venlafaxine 75 mg/day.
* Concurrent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin, or anticoagulant medications.
* Treatment for physical or psychiatric illness initiated within the prior 4 weeks or escalating in dosage or intensity.
* History of hypersensitivity to citalopram or serotonin-syndrome.
* Participation in any investigational drug study within thirty days of study entry.
* Pregnancy
* Sexually active female subjects refusing to use a medically accepted method of birth control during the study, or who engaged in unprotected sexual activity during the 30 days prior to the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

John V. Campo, M.D.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John V. Campo, M.D.

Chief Of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry -Medical Director

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John V Campo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Campo JV, Perel J, Lucas A, Bridge J, Ehmann M, Kalas C, Monk K, Axelson D, Birmaher B, Ryan N, Di Lorenzo C, Brent DA. Citalopram treatment of pediatric recurrent abdominal pain and comorbid internalizing disorders: an exploratory study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;43(10):1234-42. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000136563.31709.b0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15381890 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01MH069715-04

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

DAHBR B4-TBI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

5R01MH069715-04

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cannabinoid Medication for Adults With OCD
NCT02911324 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Partners in Caring for Anxious Youth
NCT04598230 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3