Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-10-31
2005-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT03683641
Ultrasound-Monitored Changes in Achilles Tendinopathy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
NCT04780919
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Adjuvant Effect of Shock Wave Therapy in the Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT02757664
Using of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Treatment Of Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT04376294
Evaluation of the Course and Effectiveness of Conservative Therapy in Patients With Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT05702918
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extracorporal shock wave therapy (ESWT) originally used for treatment of renal stones became popular in the last decade for treatment of different soft tissue disorders including calcifying tendinopathy in the rotator cuff, humeral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis (Haake 2001, Ogden 2001, Chung 2002, Gerdesmeyer 2003, Speed 2004). It is now worldwide employed and FDA-approved for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. However regarding both calcifying tendinopathy in the rotator cuff, humeral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis the results are conflicting (Rompe 1996, Boddeker 2001, Hammer 2002, Schmitt 2002, Gross 2003, Haake 2003, Pleiner 2004, Chung 2005). A series of randomized studies on ESWT for soft tissue disorders have been reported (Rompe 1997, Krishek 1998, Loew 1999, Rompe 2001, Haake 2001, Hammer 2002, Schmitt 2002, Gerdesmeyer 2003, Gross 2003, Haake 2003, Pleiner 2004, Chung 2005, Costa 2005) only four reporting significant effect of ESWT (Rompe 1997, Krishek 1998, Loew 1999, Gerdesmeyer 2003), and only one randomised studies for chronic achilles tendinopathy (Costa 2005). Two uncontrolled (Perlick 2002, Lakshmanan 2003) and one controlled (Furia 2005) series introduce ESWT for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. The results of these papers are seriously conflicting. Some authors include training and others not. Since eccentric training has documented effect (Alfredson 2000) other conservative treatments should be introduced as a supplement.
We investigated in a double blind randomized trial the supplementary effect of ESWT to enhance recovery of Achilles tendinopathy. We investigated, firstly, the effect on AOFAS score and secondly the effect on pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active ESWT
Shock Wave Therapy
Extracorporal shock-wave therapy
Sham ESWT
Shock Wave Therapy
Extracorporal shock-wave therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shock Wave Therapy
Extracorporal shock-wave therapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sten Rasmussen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopaedic Division, North Denmark Region, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ON-07-001-RAS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.