Efficacy and Safety Study of BIA 2-093 in Combination With Other Anti-Epileptic Drugs to Treat Partial Epilepsy

NCT ID: NCT00957047

Last Updated: 2025-03-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

395 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2008-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate once-daily at doses of 400 mg, 800 mg and 1200 mg compared with placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients who complete Part I may enter a 1-year open-label extension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Part I was a 22-week parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled period (8 weeks baseline, 2 weeks double-blind titration, and 12 weeks maintenance). After completing the baseline period, patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to 1 of the 3 ESL dose levels or to placebo.

Part II was a 1-year open-label extension for patients who had completed Part I. The starting dose was 800 mg once daily and could be titrated up or down at 400-mg intervals between 400 and 1200 mg.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Partial Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESL 400 mg once daily

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) was supplied in 400 mg tablets for Part I

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

eslicarbazepine acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablets

ESL 800 mg once daily

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) was supplied in 800-mg tablets for Part I

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

eslicarbazepine acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablets

ESL 1200 mg once daily

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) was supplied in 400-mg and 800-mg tablets for Part I

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

eslicarbazepine acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablets

placebo

Placebo tablets matching the 400-mg and 800-mg active substance tablets were supplied

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

once daily placebo comparator

ESL - Part II

All patients in Part II (Open-label Extension ) received ESL on an open-label basis, starting at 800 mg once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ESL - Part II

Intervention Type DRUG

Eslicarbazepine acetate was supplied as scored 800-mg tablets for daily oral administration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

eslicarbazepine acetate

oral tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

once daily placebo comparator

Intervention Type DRUG

ESL - Part II

Eslicarbazepine acetate was supplied as scored 800-mg tablets for daily oral administration.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zebinix Sugar pill Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), BIA 2-093

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* written informed consent signed by patient
* aged 18 years or more
* documented diagnosis of simple or complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation since at least 12 months prior to screening
* at least 4 partial seizures in each 4 week period during the last 8 weeks prior to screening, currently treated with 1 or 2 AEDs (any except oxcarbazepine and felbamate), in a stable dose regimen during at least 2 months prior to screening (patients using vigabatrin should have been on this medication for at least 1 year with no deficit in visual field identified)
* excepting epilepsy, patient is judged to be in general good health based on medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests
* post-menopausal or otherwise incapable of becoming pregnant by reason of surgery or tubal ligation; in case of woman of childbearing potential, patient must present a serum beta-hCG test consistent with a non-gravid state and agree to remain abstinent or use reliable contraception (oral contraception should be combined with a barrier method

Exclusion Criteria

* only simple partial seizures with no motor symptomatology (classified as A2-4 according to the International Classification of Epileptic Seizures) that are not video-EEG documented
* primarily generalised epilepsy
* known rapid progressive neurological disorder; history of status epilepticus or cluster seizures (i.e., 3 or more seizures within 30 minutes) within the 3 months prior to screening
* seizures of psychogenic origin within the last 2 years
* history of schizophrenia or suicide attempt
* currently on or with exposure to felbamate or oxcarbazepine more within one month of screening
* using benzodiazepines on more than on an occasional basis (except when used chronically as AED)
* previous use of ESL or participation in a clinical study with ESL
* known hypersensitivity to carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine or chemically related substances
* history of abuse of alcohol, drugs or medications within the last 2 years
* uncontrolled cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, metabolic, haematological or oncology disorder
* second or third-degree atrioventricular blockade not corrected with a pacemaker
* relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bial - Portela C S.A.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elinor Ben-Menachem, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sahlgren University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

Alberto Alain Gabbai, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rua Pedro de Toledo 655, Vila Clemento, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A.

Trofa, Coronado (S.Romão E S. Mamede), Portugal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andermann E, Rosenfeld W, Penovich P, Rogin J, Cendes F, Carreno M, Ramsay RE, Ben-Menachem E, Gama H, Rocha F, Soares-da-Silva P, Tosiello R, Blum D, Grinnell T. Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (>/=60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults. Epilepsy Res. 2021 Jan;169:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106478. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33338829 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIA-2093-302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.