Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Treated With Radiofrequency Ablation Or Surgery
NCT ID: NCT00956930
Last Updated: 2022-11-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-08-31
2016-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying radioembolization to see how well it works compared with chemoembolization in treating patients with liver cancer that cannot be treated with Radiofrequency Ablation or removed by surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chemoembolization in Treating Patients With Primary Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver
NCT00003907
Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Embolization Using Yttrium Y 90 Glass Microspheres for Primary or Metastatic Liver Cancer
NCT00739167
Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization With Cisplatin or Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
NCT00109954
Doxorubicin By Infusion or Chemoembolization in Treating Patients With Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Liver Cancer)
NCT00079027
Yttrium Y-90 Radioembolization in Treating Patients With Metastatic Liver Cancer
NCT03028311
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare and contrast TACE and Y90 in order to determine either equivalence or superiority as measured by time-to-progression.
Secondary
* Characterize the safety and toxicity profile of these regimens.
* Determine the need for subsequent treatment in these patients.
* Determine tumor response in these patients
* Characterize change in quality of life and functional status in these patients.
* Determine time to progression in these patients.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to receive either TACE or Y90
* Arm I (radioembolization): Patients undergo radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
* Arm II (transarterial chemoembolization \[TACE\]): Patients undergo TACE with mitomycin C, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
* In both arms, treatment modifications may apply according to response.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (radioembolization)
Patients undergo radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres
Patients undergo radioembolization.
Arm II (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE])
Patients undergo TACE with mitomycin C, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
Doxorubicin
75mg fixed dose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres
Patients undergo radioembolization.
Doxorubicin
75mg fixed dose
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of liver confined HCC confirmed by histology or American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines \[59,60\] \[appendix A\].
* Lesions \< 1 cm in diameter have a low likelihood of being malignant and should be followed. Lack of growth over 1-2 years suggests it is not HCC.
* AFP \>200 and radiological evidence (arterial hypervascularity) of lesion \> 2 cm does not require biopsy.
* Two imaging modalities (triphasic CT, MRI, ultrasound, angiography) demonstrating "arterial hypervascularity" in the background of cirrhosis does not require biopsy
* One imaging modality with a lesion with arterial hypervascularity with wash out in early or delayed venous phase, does not require a biopsy
* Atypical appearances on imaging requires a biopsy.
* Non-conclusive biopsy requires closer monitoring
* For non-cirrhotics (by biopsy or imaging findings), diagnosis of HCC requires biopsy
* Patients with \<50% liver involvement
* Measurable liver confined disease with bi-dimensional measurements, required within 4 weeks of screening. Lesions reported on imaging as "too small to characterize", abdominal lymph nodes \< 2.0 cm or ascites in the setting of cirrhosis are not considered metastatic disease unless cytology proven.
* No segmental, lobar or main portal vein thrombosis as evidence by cross sectional imaging
* Prior resection permitted, no prior systemic, ablative or infusion therapy permitted
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2 \[appendix B\]
* Childs score of A or B \[appendix C\]
* Required lab parameters within 28 days of screening
* Serum bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dl (unless segmental infusion can be performed
* AST and ALT ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
* Prothrombin time (PT)/ International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 2.3 or PT ≤ 6 seconds above control. If subjects are being anticoagulated they can participate if proof of no coagulation abnormality existed prior to use of anticoagulants
* Negative serum or urine pregnancy test for females of child bearing potential
* Ability to understand and sign the informed consent; patient must have signed informed consent prior to registration on study
* Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must use contraception while on study
* Lesions must be treatable angiographically by either radioembolization or chemoembolization.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with infiltrative HCC are not eligible.
* Patients with bulk disease (≥70% tumor replacement of liver) are not eligible.
* Patients with ≥50% tumor replacement of liver, with an albumin \< 3.0 g/dl are not eligible.
* Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
* Active clinically serious infection \> Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 4.0) Grade 2
* Any condition (psychological, physical or use/abuse of substances) which, in the opinion of the principal investigator (PI) or a sub-investigator (sub-I), would possibly endanger the subject during their participation in the study, or allow for non-compliance with the investigational drug and treatment under study.
* Due to the experimental nature of the therapy and the unknown risk to a fetus, pregnant and/or lactating women are not eligible to participate in this study.
* In the opinion of the investigator, patient is not a candidate/lesion not amenable for RFA (e.g. lesion location, shape, abnormal coagulation parameters, multi-focality).
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Riad Salem
Chief Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Riad Salem, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Salem R, Gordon AC, Mouli S, Hickey R, Kallini J, Gabr A, Mulcahy MF, Baker T, Abecassis M, Miller FH, Yaghmai V, Sato K, Desai K, Thornburg B, Benson AB, Rademaker A, Ganger D, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ. Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec;151(6):1155-1163.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU# 00012339
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000651416
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
STU 12339
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.