Study of AR-67 (DB-67) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT ID: NCT00956787
Last Updated: 2014-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase I Study of Cell Therapies for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML or High-risk MDS
NCT05457010
Decitabine, Arsenic Trioxide and Ascorbic Acid for Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00671697
Phase II Study of Idarubicin, Cytarabine, and Vorinostat With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT00656617
Phase 1-2 Study of Low Dose ASTX727 (ASTX727 LD) in Lower Risk MDS
NCT03502668
A Study of Atezolizumab Administered Alone or in Combination With Azacitidine in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndromes
NCT02508870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In vitro data suggested that topoisomerase I inhibitors could have activity in MDS, and a prolonged exposure appeared to be particularly effective. Topotecan was the first agent of this class explored for this purpose. A phase I study established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at 2 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion for 5 days. Using this dose, a phase II study in patients with MDS and CMML, a complete remission rate of 31% was achieved. These agents are now considered the most effective available to date in the treatment of MDS and constitute standard therapy. Because of the different times when the studies were conducted and the different eligibility criteria used (e.g., patients with secondary MDS not eligible for decitabine, only patients with high-risk MDS eligible for topotecan), comparisons are somehow limited. However, results with topotecan compare favorably to those obtained with both 5-azacytidine and decitabine. The CR rate is the highest achieved with any of these agents. Response duration is shorter than that reported for AZA, but the remission duration for AZA includes hematologic improvements which constitute most of the responses with AZA. In addition, the AZA study continued therapy until the response was lost, while the topotecan study (as well as the decitabine study) administered by design only 4-6 cycles of therapy. Survival was shorter for patients treated with topotecan, but this is not unexpected considering that this population included 50% of patients with CMML and 32% with secondary MDS, both important adverse prognostic characteristics in MDS. The AZA study had the best survival, but it included 37% patients with RA or RAES and only 20% with intermediate-2 or high IPSS. Because the eligibility included patients with greater than 10% blasts, all MDS patients would have had a score of at least 1.5 and thus be classified in the intermediate-2 risk group.
Based on the favorable activity of topotecan as a single agent, topotecan was also used in combination with cytarabine in high-risk MDS (i.e., RAEB with \>10% blasts or RAEBt). A CR rate of 56% was achieved, with a low rate of induction mortality (7%) in a population with a median age of 68 years. These results were at least equivalent to those achieved with an idarubicin and cytarabine combination both in a retrospective comparison of two different trials, and in a prospective randomized trial.
Overall, these results suggest that additional exploration of topoisomerase I inhibitors in myelodysplastic syndrome is warranted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment with AR-67
Patients will receive AR-67 at an initial dose of 7.5 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour daily for 5 days.
AR-67 (20S)-7-t-Butyldimethylsilyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin)
Patients will receive AR-67 at an initial dose of 7.5 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour daily for 5 days. In patients with stable disease, treatment may continue for up to a total of 12 courses of therapy; about 1 to 2 years.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AR-67 (20S)-7-t-Butyldimethylsilyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin)
Patients will receive AR-67 at an initial dose of 7.5 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour daily for 5 days. In patients with stable disease, treatment may continue for up to a total of 12 courses of therapy; about 1 to 2 years.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* MDS and \>5% blasts, or IPSS risk group intermediate-1, intermediate-2 or high risk
* Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
2. Patients must have failed prior therapy with either a hypomethylating agent (e.g., azacytidine, decitabine) alone or in combination with other agents. Patients with abnormalities in chromosome 5q, should have failed either a hypomethylating agent or lenalidomide.
* Patients intolerant or unable to receive these agents will be considered eligible.
3. Age \> 18 years. Because no dosing or adverse event data are currently available on the use of AR-67 in patients \< 18 years of age, children are excluded from this study but will be eligible for future pediatric single-agent trials, if applicable.
4. ECOG performance status 0-2.
5. Patients must have normal organ function as defined below:
* Total bilirubin: \< 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal
* ALT (SGPT): \< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
* Creatinine: \< 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal
6. The effects of AR-67 on the developing human fetus at the recommended therapeutic dose are unknown. For this reason women of child-bearing potential (i.e., not post-menopausal for at least 12 months and not surgically sterile) and men must agree to use effective methods of contraception. Women of childbearing potential (any women who is not surgically sterile or \> 2 years post menopause) must give consent for using a reliable method of contraception (e.g. double-barrier, tubal ligation or stable hormonal contraception) throughout the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
7. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
8. Patients must have been off chemotherapy for 2 weeks prior to entering this study unless there is evidence of rapidly progressive disease. Patients must have recovered from the toxic effects of prior therapy to grade ≤1. The use of hydroxyurea is allowed to control counts up to 24 hrs prior to the start of therapy with AR-67.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active and uncontrolled systemic infections.
3. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Arno Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jorge Cortes, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MDACC PROTOCOL NO. 2008-0530
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ARN-AR67-IIS201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT00930540
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.