Predicting Response to Capecitabine in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00953537
Last Updated: 2015-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
303 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2011-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying blood samples in predicting response to capecitabine in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of the Impact of DPD Activity on the Efficacy of Capecitabine
NCT04198727
Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00896376
Navelbine and Capecitabine in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00153907
Investigation of Genetic Determinants of Capecitabine Toxicity
NCT00977119
Studying Biopsy Samples in Women Undergoing First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00870168
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of dihydrouracil/uracil (UH\_2/U) ratio measured before starting treatment on grade 3-4 capecitabine-related toxicity in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Secondary
* To prospectively test the value of the germinal genotype of thymidylate synthase (TS) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) as predictors of resistance to capecitabine.
* To evaluate the practical feasibility of such pre-therapeutic screening.
* To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotyping on grade 3-4 capecitabine-related toxicity in the first and second courses.
* To evaluate the predictive gain provided by genotyping relative to phenotyping alone.
* To evaluate the influence of TS and MTHFR gene polymorphisms on clinical response and duration of response.
* To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites and their relationship with UH\_2/U and genotype.
* To evaluate the total cost of pre-therapeutic phenotyping alone and the combination of phenotyping and genotyping.
* To exhaustively analyze the 23 exons of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene in patients who developed toxicity.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Blood samples are collected 8-15 days before the start of treatment and periodically on the first day of treatment for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping (dihydrouracil/uracil ratio and high performance liquid chromatography analysis), genotyping (4 most relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms), and pharmacokinetic analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
capecitabine
capecitabine
laboratory biomarker analysis
pharmacological study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
capecitabine
laboratory biomarker analysis
pharmacological study
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Radiologically (by scintography) or histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer
* At least 1 measurable or evaluable target lesion
* Receiving capecitabine as monotherapy or with targeted antiangiogenic therapies (e.g., bevacizumab or trastuzumab)
* No uncontrolled brain metastases
* Hormone receptor status not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* Menopausal status not specified
* Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No chronic uncontrolled illness
* No congestive heart failure
* No peripheral venous disease
* No severe uncontrolled infection
* No hypoxemic respiratory failure
* No prior primary cancer except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin
* No psychologic disorder
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
* No capecitabine co-administered with chemotherapy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean Marc Ferrero, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CALACASS-DPD-Sein
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2008/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
INCA-RECF0942
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EUDRACT-2008-004136-20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000638377
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.