Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor IN Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!)

NCT ID: NCT00949221

Last Updated: 2023-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Glycemic control in children and adolescent with type 1 diabetes remains inadequate, exposing them to the risk of vascular complications in adulthood.

One of the limiting factors is the daily number of self measurements of blood glucose required to optimize intensive insulin therapy.

Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring augmented by alarms (RT CGM) is a recent innovation. A randomized clinical study has shown its efficacy at short term (3 months). However, optimal clinical use of these devices requires rigorous assessment of their effectiveness on glycemic control, tolerance and acceptability in medium and long term.

Primary objective: To assess the long-term effectiveness of two strategies of use of RT CGM (continuous or discontinuous) on glycemic control compared to conventional blood glucose self-monitoring (SMBG).

Population: Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite the development of intensive insulin therapy, glycemic control defined by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) \< 7,5% remains inadequate in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Improvement of the metabolic control is limited by the daily number of self measurements of blood glucose required to adjust closely insulin therapy

Improving glycemic control is particularly important in type 1 children and adolescent, whose risk of vascular complications in adulthood is high, due to the duration of the disease and whose adherence to current strategies of blood glucose self-monitoring is limited.

Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring augmented by alarms (RT CGM) is a recent innovation. A randomized clinical study has shown improvement of HbA1c (≈ 1%) without increasing frequency of hypoglycaemia after continuous use for 3 months. Optimal clinical use of these new devices requires rigorous assessment of their effectiveness on glycemic control, tolerance and acceptability at medium and long term.

Primary objective: To assess the long-term effectiveness of two strategies of use of RT CGM on glycemic control compared to conventional blood glucose self-monitoring.

Secondary objectives: overall comparison of 2 strategies of continuous use of RT CGM vs conventional SMBG on HbA1c ; to evaluate their effectiveness on others parameters of glycemic control (hypoglycaemias, ketoacidosis, glycemic variability); to evaluate impact on glycemic control of different factors including percentage of effective time of wearing the sensor; to evaluate : skin tolerance, acceptability of the device; quality of life and satisfaction to the use of the device; and medico-economic impact of the use of the device.

Population: Type 1 diabetes children and adolescent with inadequate metabolic control despite intensive insulin therapy, randomized in 3 groups. After a period of 3 months of continuous measurement for all of them, the two strategies will be an intensive glucose monitoring by continuous measurement for 9 months (a total of 12 months) and an intermediate consisting of discontinuous measurement (40% of the time for 9 months), compared to conventional blood glucose self-monitoring.

The reduction in HbA1c of at least 0,6% requires 50 patients per group, and a total of 150 children.

Primary endpoint: change in the rate of HbA1c.

Secondary endpoints: frequency of acute metabolic events, non-severe or symptomatic hypoglycaemia; measure of glycemic variability; skin tolerance; number of sensor used and percentage of effective time of use of the device; satisfaction of the patients; quality of life and diabetes-related quality of life; choice of the patient (continuing or not to use the device) at the end of the study; medico-economic evaluation.

Benefits expected with this clinical trial: improvement of glycemic control and quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Furthermore, study results would permit to defined optimal strategy of using RT CGM in paediatric population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 2

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE: Intensive strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months

Group Type OTHER

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE

Intervention Type DEVICE

* group 1: continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then conventional blood glucose self-monitoring for 9 months;
* group 2: intensive strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months;
* group 3: intermediate strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then discontinuous use of the device for 9 months (approximately 40% of the time, alternating with conventional blood glucose self-monitoring).

Group 3

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE: Intermediate strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then discontinuous use of the device for 9 months (approximately 40% of the time, alternating with conventional blood glucose self-monitoring).

Group Type OTHER

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE

Intervention Type DEVICE

* group 1: continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then conventional blood glucose self-monitoring for 9 months;
* group 2: intensive strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months;
* group 3: intermediate strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then discontinuous use of the device for 9 months (approximately 40% of the time, alternating with conventional blood glucose self-monitoring).

Group 1

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE: Continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then conventional blood glucose self-monitoring for 9 months

Group Type OTHER

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE

Intervention Type DEVICE

* group 1: continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then conventional blood glucose self-monitoring for 9 months;
* group 2: intensive strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months;
* group 3: intermediate strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then discontinuous use of the device for 9 months (approximately 40% of the time, alternating with conventional blood glucose self-monitoring).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

monitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE

* group 1: continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then conventional blood glucose self-monitoring for 9 months;
* group 2: intensive strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months;
* group 3: intermediate strategy using continuous glucose monitoring for 3 months, then discontinuous use of the device for 9 months (approximately 40% of the time, alternating with conventional blood glucose self-monitoring).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 2 years and 17 years 11 months.
* Onset of type 1 diabetes ≥ 1 year.
* Centralized HPLC HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and \< 11%.
* Intensive insulin therapy either by multiple daily injections ≥ 3 / day (rapid insulin analogue before 3 meal and 1 to 2 injections of basal insulin) or by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (pump).
* Followed in the centre for ≥ 3 months.
* Blood glucose self-monitoring ≥ 2/day.
* No significant change of regimen insulin therapy for at least 3 months.
* Patient receiving medical health insurance.
* Patient who has given his consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Non type 1 diabetes(type 2 diabetes or diabetes whose evolution suggest other origin).
* Association with another pathology which, in the discretion of the investigator, could affect the monitoring or be disturbed by the participation in the study.
* Association with chronic treatment (steroids, growth hormone…) or chronic disease, including hypothyroidism and celiac disease, non stabilized for 3 months.
* Association with severe skin disease.
* Deafness, hearing or visual defect.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadia Tubiana, PH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Robert Debré

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guilmin-Crepon S, Carel JC, Schroedt J, Scornet E, Alberti C, Tubiana-Rufi N. How Should We Assess Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes? Contribution of Principal Component Analysis for Interstitial Glucose Indices in 142 Children. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jun;20(6):440-447. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0404.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29923773 (View on PubMed)

Guilmin-Crepon S, Carel JC, Schroedt J, Sulmont V, Salmon AS, Le Tallec C, Coutant R, Dalla-Vale F, Stuckens C, Bony-Trifunovic H, Crosnier H, Kurtz F, Kaguelidou F, Le Jeannic A, Durand-Zaleski I, Couque N, Alberti C, Tubiana-Rufi N. Is there an optimal strategy for real-time continuous glucose monitoring in pediatrics? A 12-month French multi-center, prospective, controlled randomized trial (Start-In!). Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 May;20(3):304-313. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12820. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30663187 (View on PubMed)

Le Jeannic A, Maoulida H, Guilmin-Crepon S, Alberti C, Tubiana-Rufi N, Durand-Zaleski I. How to collect non-medical data in a pediatric trial: diaries or interviews. Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3997-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31910885 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-A01330-53

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P070152

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.