PEAK PlasmaBlade™ 4.0 Versus Traditional Electrosurgery in Mastectomy
NCT ID: NCT00943605
Last Updated: 2013-01-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PEAK PlasmaBlade™ 4.0 Versus Traditional Electrosurgery in Lumpectomy
NCT00960154
A Study to Evaluate Cutaneous Scar Quality Following Bilateral Breast Reduction With the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0
NCT01284491
Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions
NCT06191159
Comparison of PEAK PlasmaBlade™ to Conventional Diathermy in Abdominal Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction
NCT04350411
Study to Evaluate Surgical Excision Margins in Malignant Breast Lumpectomies With the PEAK PlasmaBlade
NCT00972010
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following mastectomy, the most common complication is persistent serous wound drainage and seroma, a collection of fluid in the closed surgical space. To help prevent this complication a tissue drain is used to remove serous fluid from the surgical space via bulb suction. The rate of serous fluid collection is used to determine the time the drain remains in place. Although suction drains help reduce seroma formation, prolonged use may delay healing, cause injury, and increase the risk of infection and patient discomfort.
The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy to enable precision cutting and coagulating at the point of application, without the thermal damage to surrounding tissues that is normally seen with traditional electrosurgery. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, and ENT surgery, and has demonstrated significantly reduced serous drainage in tissue reduction surgeries, like mastectomy.
This multi-site study was granted IRB approval and conducted between June 2009 and January 2011. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were then required to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subjects were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PlasmaBlade (PB or PEAK) study groups and scheduled for mastectomy with or without same day reconstruction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care
Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
Scalpel and Traditional Electrosurgery
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
PEAK PlasmaBlade
The entirety of the mastectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade, including the skin incision.
PEAK PlasmaBlade
The entirety of the mastectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade, including the skin incision.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Scalpel and Traditional Electrosurgery
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
PEAK PlasmaBlade
The entirety of the mastectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade, including the skin incision.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Physically healthy, stable weight
3. Requiring single or bilateral simple mastectomy, with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy
4. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure
5. Subject must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up evaluations
Exclusion Criteria
2. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
3. Prior external beam or implanted radiotherapy
4. Tobacco use (any kind)
5. Infection (local or systemic)
6. Cognitive impairment or mental illness
7. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
8. Known coagulopathy
9. Immunocompromised
10. Kidney disease (any type)
11. Desiring or requiring same-day breast reconstruction
12. Prior breast reduction or augmentation surgery
13. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up
14. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
15. Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass
16. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
17. Time from most recent neoadjuvant therapy less than 4 weeks
20 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Surgical Technologies
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Teresa Ponn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Elliot Breast Health Center
Edward Dalton, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Elliot Breast Health Center
Richard Fine, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Advanced Breast Care
Peter Naruns, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Midpeninsula Surgical Associates
Saul Eisenstat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Midpeninsula Surgical Associates
Michael Schultz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Joseph Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Providence St. Joseph's Medical Center
Burbank, California, United States
El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, United States
Advanced Breast Care
Marietta, Georgia, United States
St. Joseph Medical Center
Towson, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEAK VP-00074
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.