A Phase 3, Multi-Center Study of Gemcitabine/Carboplatin, With or Without BSI-201, in Patients With ER-, PR-, and Her2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00938652

Last Updated: 2013-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

519 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study was to determine the effect on overall survival and progression free survival by adding iniparib (BSI-201/SAR240550) to the combination of gemcitabine/carboplatin in adult patients with triple negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative).

Based on data generated by BiPar/Sanofi, it is concluded that iniparib does not possess characteristics typical of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor class. The exact mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated, however based on experiments on tumor cells performed in the laboratory, iniparib is a novel investigational anti-cancer agent that induces gamma-H2AX (a marker of DNA damage) in tumor cell lines, induces cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase in tumor cell lines, and potentiates the cell cycle effects of DNA damaging modalities in tumor cell lines. Investigations into potential targets of iniparib and its metabolites are ongoing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants were treated for 21-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. After treatment discontinuation, participants were followed until end of study or death or receipt of new anticancer therapy, whichever was first.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

triple negative breast cancer metastatic breast cancer Triple negative metastatic breast cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm G/C

gemcitabine/carboplatin on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle(s)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

gemcitabine/carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion (30 ± 10 minutes)

Carboplatin AUC 2 intravenous infusion (30 ± 10 minutes or 60 ± 10 minutes)

Arm G/C/I

gemcitabine/carboplatin on Days 1 and 8, plus iniparib on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycle(s)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

gemcitabine/carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion (30 ± 10 minutes)

Carboplatin AUC 2 intravenous infusion (30 ± 10 minutes or 60 ± 10 minutes)

Iniparib

Intervention Type DRUG

Body weight adjusted dose

intravenous infusion (60 ± 10 minutes)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gemcitabine/carboplatin

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion (30 ± 10 minutes)

Carboplatin AUC 2 intravenous infusion (30 ± 10 minutes or 60 ± 10 minutes)

Intervention Type DRUG

Iniparib

Body weight adjusted dose

intravenous infusion (60 ± 10 minutes)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BSI-201 SAR240550

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Histologically documented breast cancer (either primary or metastatic site) that is ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER2 non-overexpressing by immunohistochemistry (0, 1) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Triple-negative tumors were defined by the following criteria:

* HER2-non-overexpressing: FISH-negative (defined by ratio \<2.2) or, immunohistochemical (IHC) 0, IHC 1+ or, IHC 2+ or IHC 3+ and FISH-negative.
* ER- and PR-negative: \<10% tumor staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

* Never having received chemotherapy for metastatic disease or, having received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting (Prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy was allowed);
* Metastatic breast cancer (Stage IV) with measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria;
* Female, ≥18 years of age;
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1;
* Organ and marrow function as follows: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/mm3, platelets ≥100,000/dL, hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL, bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dL, serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal if no liver involvement or ≤5 times the upper limit of normal with liver involvement;
* Radiation therapy completed at least 14 days before study dosing on day 1; radiated lesions may not have served as measurable disease;
* Central nervous system metastases allowed if subject did not require steroids, whole brain radiation therapy (XRT), gamma/cyber knife, and brain metastases were clinically stable without symptomatic progression;
* For women of child bearing potential, documented negative pregnancy test within two weeks of study entry and agreement to acceptable birth control during the duration of the study therapy;
* Tissue block (primary or metastatic) or readily available fresh frozen tumor tissue for PARP expression and other pharmacogenomic studies recommended (although its absence will not exclude subjects from participating);
* No other diagnosis of malignancy (with exception of non melanoma skin cancer or a malignancy diagnosed ≥5 years ago);
* Obtained informed consent;
* Capability to understand and comply with the protocol and signed informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic anticancer therapy within 14 days of the first dose of study drug;
* Prior treatment with gemcitabine, carboplatin, cisplatin or iniparib
* Had not recovered to grade ≤1 from adverse events (AEs) per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v3.0 or to within 10% of baseline values due to investigational drugs or other medications administered more than 30 days prior to study enrollment;
* Major medical conditions that might have affected study participation (e.g. uncontrolled pulmonary, renal, or hepatic dysfunction, uncontrolled infection, cardiac disease);
* Concurrent radiation therapy intended to treat primary tumor not permitted throughout the course of the study; palliative radiation was acceptable;
* Leptomeningeal disease or brain metastases requiring steroids or other therapeutic intervention;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Inability or unwillingness to abide by the study protocol or cooperate fully with the investigator or designee.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Sciences & Operations

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sanofi

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sedona, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Alhambra, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Campbell, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nothridge, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Redondo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Vallejo, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Grand Junction, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bonita Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ocoee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albany, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Westminster, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Royal, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Reserach Site

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hooksett, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sparta, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

East Setauket, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Reserach Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reserach Site

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fredericksburg, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Suffolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kennewick, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Sites

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Yakima, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

O'Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg L, Danso MA, Miller KD, Rugo HS, Neubauer M, Robert N, Hellerstedt B, Saleh M, Richards P, Specht JM, Yardley DA, Carlson RW, Finn RS, Charpentier E, Garcia-Ribas I, Winer EP. Phase III study of iniparib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin versus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3840-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2984. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25349301 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20090301

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1119-8208

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EFC11486

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id