Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery (NCT NCT00933270)

NCT ID: NCT00933270

Last Updated: 2017-05-30

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

325 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

30 days

Results posted on

2017-05-30

Participant Flow

A total of 46 sites in the US enrolled 325 subjects into this study. The first patient was enrolled on July 30, 2009 and the last patient was enrolled on May 20, 2011. Intention-To-Treat (ITT) population included 264 subjects and Per-Protocol (PP) population included 257 subjects. In addition, 61 roll-in subjects were enrolled.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Overall Study
STARTED
264
Overall Study
COMPLETED
177
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
87

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
26
Overall Study
Insufficient Follow-up
10
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
14
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
Overall Study
Missed Visit
2
Overall Study
Death
24
Overall Study
Moved or would not return
10

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Age, Continuous
ITT population
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
244 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
221 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
264 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 days

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=260 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from Death,TLR or amputation (30 days)
99.2 percentage of participants
Interval 97.2 to 99.9
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from All Cause Death to 30 days
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 97.9 to 100.0
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from TLR to 30 days
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 97.9 to 100.0
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from Amputation of the index limb(30 days)
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 98.6 to 100.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=228 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
Patency rate at 12 months
78.9 percentage of participants
Interval 73.1 to 84.1
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
No restenosis at 12 months
86.7 percentage of participants
Interval 81.6 to 90.9
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
Freedom from TLR at 12 months
88.9 percentage of participants
Interval 84.2 to 92.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: intraoperative

Population: Per ITT set: Post-procedure angiogram analyzed by core lab

Technical (lesion) success, defined as the attainment of \<50% residual stenosis by Quantitative Angiography (QA) by any percutaneous method as determined by the Angiographic core laboratory.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=262 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Technical (Lesion) Success
100.0 percentage of treated segments
Interval 98.6 to 100.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: intraoperative

Population: Per ITT set. Supera implanted. Post-procedure angiogram analyzed by core lab Occurrence of death, amputation or TLR during the hospital stay

Defined as device success with \< 50% residual stenosis immediately after stent placement, mean trans-stenotic pressure gradient less than 5 mmHg, and without the occurrence of death, amputation or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=261 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Procedural Success
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 98.6 to 100.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: intraoperative

Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Post-procedure angiogram analyzed by core lab

Device success, defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QA), using the assigned treatment only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=261 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Device Success
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 96.1 to 99.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 12 months (± 30 Days) (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=233 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Secondary Safety Composite Endpoint
12.45 percentage of participants
Interval 8.5 to 17.38

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=213 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Secondary Safety Endpoint
19.25 percentage of participants
Interval 14.18 to 25.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 36 months (± 30 Days)(comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=178 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Secondary Safety Endpoint
24.16 percentage of participants
Interval 18.07 to 31.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
11.5 percentage of participants
Interval 7.7 to 16.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=215 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
17.7 percentage of participants
Interval 12.8 to 23.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=184 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
22.3 percentage of participants
Interval 16.5 to 29.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Patient returned for visit and had x-ray of stent. X-ray analyzed by core lab

Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V. Stent fracture classification * Type I - a single strut fracture only. * Type II - multiple single nitinol stent fractures that can occur at different sites. * Type III - multiple nitinol stent fractures resulting in complete transverse linear fracture but without stent displacement. * Type IV - a complete transverse linear type III fracture with stent displacement. * Type V - a spiral dissection of a stent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=244 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Stent Fracture Rate
Single Strut
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Multiple Strut
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Aligned
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Malaligned
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Spiral Fracture
0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Patient returned for visit and had x-ray of stent. X-ray analyzed by core lab

Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=202 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Stent Fracture Rate
Single Strut
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Multiple Strut
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Aligned
0.5 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Malaligned
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Spiral Fracture
0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Patient returned for visit and had x-ray of stent. X-ray analyzed by core lab

Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=162 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Stent Fracture Rate
Single Strut
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Multiple Strut
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Aligned
0.6 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Malaligned
0 percentage of participants
Stent Fracture Rate
Spiral Fracture
0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set: Baseline ABI measured prior to study procedure

A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=257 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
0.73 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT set: Patient returned for visit and had ABI measured

A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=251 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
0.99 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.17

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set: Patient returned for visit and had ABI measured

A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=226 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
0.92 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set: Patient returned for visit and had ABI measured

A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=227 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
0.92 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=241 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
1.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 4.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
11.1 percentage of participants
Interval 7.4 to 15.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=215 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 22.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=183 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
21.3 percentage of participants
Interval 15.6 to 28.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they return for visit within the window, returned for a later visit \& sponsor has information on their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, the last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame, had a duplex ultrasound performed \& analyzed by core lab

Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=225 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio ≥ 2.0
84.9 percentage of participants
Interval 79.5 to 89.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they return for visit within the window, returned for a later visit \& sponsor has information on their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, the last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame, had a duplex ultrasound performed \& analyzed by core lab

Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=225 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
86.2 percentage of participants
Interval 81.0 to 90.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if they return for visit within the window, returned for a later visit \& sponsor has information on their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, the last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame, had a duplex ultrasound performed \& analyzed by core lab

Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=228 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
80.3 percentage of participants
Interval 74.5 to 85.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 6 months post-procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=241 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Vessel Revascularization
2.5 percentage of participants
Interval 0.9 to 5.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 12 months post-procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Vessel Revascularization
13.2 percentage of participants
Interval 9.1 to 18.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 24 months post-procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=215 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Vessel Revascularization
20.5 percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 26.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 36 months post-procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=186 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Target Vessel Revascularization
25.8 percentage of participants
Interval 19.7 to 32.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.

Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=259 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
97.3 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.

Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
89.1 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.

Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=203 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
89.2 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 Months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.

Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=167 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
92.2 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 days (±7 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=260 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
0.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
0.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
0.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
0.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months (±14 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=241 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
0.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
0.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
0.8 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
1.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
0.9 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
0.9 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
1.7 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
0.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
1.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=209 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
1.4 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
1.0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
1.9 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
1.0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
1.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=175 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
1.7 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
1.1 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
0 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
2.3 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
1.1 percentage of participants
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
1.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (±14 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=240 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Index Limb Amputations
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=233 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Index Limb Amputations
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=207 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Index Limb Amputations
1.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 3.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 months (±30 days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.

Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=173 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Index Limb Amputations
1.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 4.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the SF-12 Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL. SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed (QoL) by SF-12 Questionnaire
Physical Summary Scale
31.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.11
Quality of Life Assessed (QoL) by SF-12 Questionnaire
Mental Summary Scale
49.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.86

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the SF-12 Questionnaire at the visit.

The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=233 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Physical Summary Scale
38.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.59
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Mental Summary Scale
51.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the SF-12 Questionnaire at the visit

The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=229 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Physical Summary Scale
39.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.03
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Mental Summary Scale
51.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=256 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
26.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=209 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
52.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.72

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=206 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
56.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.82

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
37.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.40

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=231 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
69.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
72.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
39.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.53

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
55.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.38

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=229 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
52.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=261 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
48.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=211 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
73.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.30

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=211 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
76.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.60

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
86.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.77

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
87.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
88.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
35.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.87

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
68.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
70.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.00

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
36.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.94

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
66.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit

The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
69.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if the Rutherford Becker Classification was performed prior to the Study procedure.

Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
37.5 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
57.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
5.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 Month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed

Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=259 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
69.9 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
23.9 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
5.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
1.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed

Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
64.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
18.7 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
13.9 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
2.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
0.9 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed

Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=203 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
17.7 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
10.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
2.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
2.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
68.0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed

Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=169 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
72.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
16.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
8.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
2.4 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
1.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.

Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=259 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
68.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
23.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
6.2 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
2.7 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.

Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
1.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
0.9 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
0.4 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
53.5 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
24.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
11.3 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
8.3 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.

Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=203 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
56.7 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
25.1 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
7.4 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
4.4 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
1.5 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
3.4 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
1.5 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 36 Months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.

Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=167 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
65.9 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
19.8 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
6.6 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
6.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
0.6 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
0.0 percentage of limbs
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
1.2 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=21 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
82.32 meters
Standard Deviation 62.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=17 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
158.87 meters
Standard Deviation 140.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
158.53 meters
Standard Deviation 134.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=23 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
117.59 seconds
Standard Deviation 88.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=17 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
188.12 seconds
Standard Deviation 151.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
195.58 seconds
Standard Deviation 158.57

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=23 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
195.38 meters
Standard Deviation 107.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=18 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
294.18 meters
Standard Deviation 244.24

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
262.61 meters
Standard Deviation 141.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=23 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
245.71 seconds
Standard Deviation 136.00

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=18 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
345.22 seconds
Standard Deviation 255.76

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)

Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.

Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
317.53 seconds
Standard Deviation 159.38

Adverse Events

Supera® Peripheral Stent System ITT

Serious events: 151 serious events
Other events: 211 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Supera® Peripheral Stent System Roll-in

Serious events: 36 serious events
Other events: 51 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System ITT
n=264 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System. ITT population consisted of 264 subjects.
Supera® Peripheral Stent System Roll-in
n=61 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System. There were a total of 61 roll-in subjects.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
3.4%
9/264 • Number of events 9 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemorrhagic anaemia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 10 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 9 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block first degree
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block second degree
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
3.4%
9/264 • Number of events 14 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 22 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
In-stent coronary artery restenosis
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Sick sinus syndrome
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Spondylolisthesis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
3.0%
8/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intra-abdominal haematoma
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Reflux gastritis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haematoma
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haemorrhage
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Brain death
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Cardiac death
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Catheter site haematoma
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Chest discomfort
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
General disorders
Chest pain
5.7%
15/264 • Number of events 18 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
General disorders
Death
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Necrosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Pain
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Immune system disorders
Iodine allergy
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Abscess
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Catheter site infection
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Meningitis viral
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
1.9%
5/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 11 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia staphylococcal
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent arterial restenosis
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 24 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medical device complication
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Open wound
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural swelling
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pubic rami fracture
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Renal injury
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stent occlusion
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular graft complication
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic foot
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Limb discomfort
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung carcinoma cell type unspecified recurrent
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-small cell lung cancer
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal carcinoma
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer metastatic
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer stage unspecified
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery occlusion
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar haemorrhage
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Embolic stroke
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Facial palsy
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Peroneal nerve palsy
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Renal and urinary disorders
Malignant renal hypertension
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure chronic
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
2.3%
6/264 • Number of events 7 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Surgical and medical procedures
Large intestine anastomosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Arterial restenosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Arterial stenosis limb
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis limb
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Arteriosclerosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Arteriovenous fistula
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Femoral arterial stenosis
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Femoral artery occlusion
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Iliac artery stenosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 20 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Leriche syndrome
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Malignant hypertension
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
4.2%
11/264 • Number of events 14 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery aneurysm
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery dissection
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
4.5%
12/264 • Number of events 17 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Venous stasis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
General disorders
Impaired healing
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Graft dysfunction
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery disease
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Supera® Peripheral Stent System ITT
n=264 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System. ITT population consisted of 264 subjects.
Supera® Peripheral Stent System Roll-in
n=61 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System. There were a total of 61 roll-in subjects.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
5.7%
15/264 • Number of events 16 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 22 • 3 Years
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
General disorders
Catheter site haematoma
6.1%
16/264 • Number of events 17 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
General disorders
Chest pain
7.6%
20/264 • Number of events 25 • 3 Years
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 6 • 3 Years
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
7.2%
19/264 • Number of events 21 • 3 Years
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent arterial restenosis
10.6%
28/264 • Number of events 37 • 3 Years
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 7 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
15.5%
41/264 • Number of events 51 • 3 Years
26.2%
16/61 • Number of events 20 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Femoral artery dissection
11.0%
29/264 • Number of events 32 • 3 Years
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 6 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
14.8%
39/264 • Number of events 52 • 3 Years
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 13 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 22 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
6.1%
16/264 • Number of events 24 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 15 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 6 • 3 Years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
3.0%
8/264 • Number of events 9 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
4.5%
12/264 • Number of events 13 • 3 Years
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
4.2%
11/264 • Number of events 12 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
4.9%
13/264 • Number of events 13 • 3 Years
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 10 • 3 Years
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 7 • 3 Years
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 11 • 3 Years
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years

Additional Information

Margo Zaugg

Abbott Vascular

Phone: 408-845-0576

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60