Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery (NCT NCT00933270)
NCT ID: NCT00933270
Last Updated: 2017-05-30
Results Overview
COMPLETED
NA
325 participants
30 days
2017-05-30
Participant Flow
A total of 46 sites in the US enrolled 325 subjects into this study. The first patient was enrolled on July 30, 2009 and the last patient was enrolled on May 20, 2011. Intention-To-Treat (ITT) population included 264 subjects and Per-Protocol (PP) population included 257 subjects. In addition, 61 roll-in subjects were enrolled.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
264
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
177
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
87
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
Insufficient Follow-up
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Missed Visit
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Moved or would not return
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
ITT population
|
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
244 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
221 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
264 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=260 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from Death,TLR or amputation (30 days)
|
99.2 percentage of participants
Interval 97.2 to 99.9
|
|
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from All Cause Death to 30 days
|
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 97.9 to 100.0
|
|
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from TLR to 30 days
|
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 97.9 to 100.0
|
|
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Freedom from Amputation of the index limb(30 days)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 98.6 to 100.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=228 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
Patency rate at 12 months
|
78.9 percentage of participants
Interval 73.1 to 84.1
|
|
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
No restenosis at 12 months
|
86.7 percentage of participants
Interval 81.6 to 90.9
|
|
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
Freedom from TLR at 12 months
|
88.9 percentage of participants
Interval 84.2 to 92.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: intraoperativePopulation: Per ITT set: Post-procedure angiogram analyzed by core lab
Technical (lesion) success, defined as the attainment of \<50% residual stenosis by Quantitative Angiography (QA) by any percutaneous method as determined by the Angiographic core laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=262 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Technical (Lesion) Success
|
100.0 percentage of treated segments
Interval 98.6 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: intraoperativePopulation: Per ITT set. Supera implanted. Post-procedure angiogram analyzed by core lab Occurrence of death, amputation or TLR during the hospital stay
Defined as device success with \< 50% residual stenosis immediately after stent placement, mean trans-stenotic pressure gradient less than 5 mmHg, and without the occurrence of death, amputation or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=261 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Procedural Success
|
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 98.6 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: intraoperativePopulation: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Post-procedure angiogram analyzed by core lab
Device success, defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by QA), using the assigned treatment only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=261 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Device Success
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 96.1 to 99.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 12 months (± 30 Days) (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=233 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Secondary Safety Composite Endpoint
|
12.45 percentage of participants
Interval 8.5 to 17.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=213 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Secondary Safety Endpoint
|
19.25 percentage of participants
Interval 14.18 to 25.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 36 months (± 30 Days)(comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=178 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Secondary Safety Endpoint
|
24.16 percentage of participants
Interval 18.07 to 31.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
|
11.5 percentage of participants
Interval 7.7 to 16.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=215 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
|
17.7 percentage of participants
Interval 12.8 to 23.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=184 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
|
22.3 percentage of participants
Interval 16.5 to 29.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Patient returned for visit and had x-ray of stent. X-ray analyzed by core lab
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V. Stent fracture classification * Type I - a single strut fracture only. * Type II - multiple single nitinol stent fractures that can occur at different sites. * Type III - multiple nitinol stent fractures resulting in complete transverse linear fracture but without stent displacement. * Type IV - a complete transverse linear type III fracture with stent displacement. * Type V - a spiral dissection of a stent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=244 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Single Strut
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Multiple Strut
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Aligned
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Malaligned
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Spiral Fracture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Patient returned for visit and had x-ray of stent. X-ray analyzed by core lab
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=202 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Single Strut
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Multiple Strut
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Aligned
|
0.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Malaligned
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Spiral Fracture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set: Supera implanted. Patient returned for visit and had x-ray of stent. X-ray analyzed by core lab
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=162 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Single Strut
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Multiple Strut
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Aligned
|
0.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Fragments Malaligned
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Stent Fracture Rate
Spiral Fracture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set: Baseline ABI measured prior to study procedure
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=257 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
|
0.73 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT set: Patient returned for visit and had ABI measured
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=251 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
|
0.99 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set: Patient returned for visit and had ABI measured
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=226 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
|
0.92 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set: Patient returned for visit and had ABI measured
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=227 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
|
0.92 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=241 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
1.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 4.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
11.1 percentage of participants
Interval 7.4 to 15.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=215 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 22.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=183 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
21.3 percentage of participants
Interval 15.6 to 28.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they return for visit within the window, returned for a later visit \& sponsor has information on their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, the last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame, had a duplex ultrasound performed \& analyzed by core lab
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=225 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio ≥ 2.0
|
84.9 percentage of participants
Interval 79.5 to 89.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they return for visit within the window, returned for a later visit \& sponsor has information on their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, the last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame, had a duplex ultrasound performed \& analyzed by core lab
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=225 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
|
86.2 percentage of participants
Interval 81.0 to 90.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if they return for visit within the window, returned for a later visit \& sponsor has information on their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, the last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame, had a duplex ultrasound performed \& analyzed by core lab
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of \> 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=228 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
|
80.3 percentage of participants
Interval 74.5 to 85.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 6 months post-procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=241 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Vessel Revascularization
|
2.5 percentage of participants
Interval 0.9 to 5.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 12 months post-procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Vessel Revascularization
|
13.2 percentage of participants
Interval 9.1 to 18.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 24 months post-procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=215 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Vessel Revascularization
|
20.5 percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 26.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 36 months post-procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=186 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Target Vessel Revascularization
|
25.8 percentage of participants
Interval 19.7 to 32.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=259 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
|
97.3 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
|
89.1 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 Months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=203 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
|
89.2 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 Months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the Limb ischemia improvement if: They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification done. They return for their visit and Rutherford Becker Clinical Classification was done.
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to \>0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=167 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
|
92.2 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days (±7 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=260 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 Months (±14 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=241 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=235 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
|
0.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
|
0.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=209 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included if: they had a procedure related MAVE event, return for their visit within the window, returned for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame, last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Defined as a composite rate of 1. stent thrombosis, 2. clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), 3. procedure-related arterial rupture, 4. acute limb ischemia, 5. target limb amputation, 6. procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=175 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Stent Thrombosis
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Clinically Apparent Distal Embolization
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure-Related Arterial Rupture
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Acute Limb Ischemia
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Target Limb Amputation
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Procedure Related Bleeding Requiring Transfusion
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (±14 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=240 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Index Limb Amputations
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=233 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Index Limb Amputations
|
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=207 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Index Limb Amputations
|
1.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 3.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 months (±30 days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the clinical endpoint if: * They return for their visit within the window * They came back for a later visit and the sponsor has information about their clinical status within the endpoint time frame * The last contact date predated the endpoint time frame but had an event within the endpoint time frame.
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=173 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Index Limb Amputations
|
1.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 4.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the SF-12 Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL. SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed (QoL) by SF-12 Questionnaire
Physical Summary Scale
|
31.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.11
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed (QoL) by SF-12 Questionnaire
Mental Summary Scale
|
49.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 Months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the SF-12 Questionnaire at the visit.
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=233 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Physical Summary Scale
|
38.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.59
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Mental Summary Scale
|
51.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the SF-12 Questionnaire at the visit
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=229 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Physical Summary Scale
|
39.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.03
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Mental Summary Scale
|
51.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=256 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
|
26.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=209 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
|
52.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=206 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
|
56.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
|
37.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=231 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
|
69.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
|
72.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
|
39.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
|
55.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=229 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
|
52.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=261 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
|
48.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=211 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
|
73.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=211 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
|
76.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
|
86.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
|
87.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
|
88.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
|
35.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
|
68.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
|
70.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the PAQ Questionnaire prior to the study procedure
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
|
36.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months (± 14 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=232 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
|
66.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. Patients are included in the QoL endpoint if: They completed the follow-up visit and the PAQ Questionnaire at the visit
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
|
69.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if the Rutherford Becker Classification was performed prior to the Study procedure.
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=264 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
|
37.5 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
|
57.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
|
5.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 Month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=259 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
|
69.9 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
|
23.9 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
|
5.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
|
1.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
|
64.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
|
18.7 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
|
13.9 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
|
2.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
|
0.9 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=203 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
|
17.7 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
|
10.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
|
2.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
|
2.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
|
68.0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if they completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=169 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Asymptomatic
|
72.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Mild Claudication
|
16.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Moderate Claudication
|
8.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Severe Claudication
|
2.4 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Ischemic Rest Pain
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Minor Tissue Loss
|
1.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Major Tissue Loss
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=259 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
|
68.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
|
23.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
|
6.2 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
|
2.7 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
|
0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=230 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
|
1.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
|
0.9 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
|
0.4 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
|
53.5 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
|
24.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
|
11.3 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
|
8.3 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=203 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
|
56.7 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
|
25.1 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
|
7.4 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
|
4.4 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
|
1.5 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
|
3.4 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
|
1.5 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 Months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT Set. Patients are included in the Rutherford Becker Score if :They had a baseline Rutherford Becker Classification performed prior to the study procedure.They completed their visit and Rutherford Becker Classification was performed.
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=167 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +3 Markedly Improved
|
65.9 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +2 Moderately Improved
|
19.8 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade +1 Minimally Improved
|
6.6 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade 0 No Change
|
6.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -1 Mildly Worse
|
0.6 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -2 Moderately Worsening
|
0.0 percentage of limbs
|
|
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Grade -3 Markedly Worsening
|
1.2 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=21 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
|
82.32 meters
Standard Deviation 62.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=17 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
|
158.87 meters
Standard Deviation 140.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
|
158.53 meters
Standard Deviation 134.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=23 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
|
117.59 seconds
Standard Deviation 88.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=17 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
|
188.12 seconds
Standard Deviation 151.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
|
195.58 seconds
Standard Deviation 158.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=23 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
|
195.38 meters
Standard Deviation 107.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=18 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
|
294.18 meters
Standard Deviation 244.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
|
262.61 meters
Standard Deviation 141.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=23 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
|
245.71 seconds
Standard Deviation 136.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month (± 7 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=18 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
|
345.22 seconds
Standard Deviation 255.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months (± 30 Days)Population: Per ITT set. The denominator for exercise testing considers factors such as: patient flow to the physician performing the procedure making it difficult to get a baseline treadmill test; patients with bilateral, multilevel peripheral disease and other underlying diseases and other factors such as age could impact their ability to exercise.
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System
n=19 Participants
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System
Supera® Peripheral Stent System: Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral or Proximal Popliteal Artery with placement of a Supera® Stent
|
|---|---|
|
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
|
317.53 seconds
Standard Deviation 159.38
|
Adverse Events
Supera® Peripheral Stent System ITT
Supera® Peripheral Stent System Roll-in
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System ITT
n=264 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System.
ITT population consisted of 264 subjects.
|
Supera® Peripheral Stent System Roll-in
n=61 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System.
There were a total of 61 roll-in subjects.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.4%
9/264 • Number of events 9 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemorrhagic anaemia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 10 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 9 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block first degree
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block second degree
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
3.4%
9/264 • Number of events 14 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 22 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
In-stent coronary artery restenosis
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sick sinus syndrome
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
3.0%
8/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intra-abdominal haematoma
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Reflux gastritis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haematoma
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haemorrhage
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Brain death
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Cardiac death
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haematoma
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
5.7%
15/264 • Number of events 18 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Necrosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Immune system disorders
Iodine allergy
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Catheter site infection
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis viral
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
1.9%
5/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 11 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia staphylococcal
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent arterial restenosis
|
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 24 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medical device complication
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Open wound
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural swelling
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pubic rami fracture
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Renal injury
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stent occlusion
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular graft complication
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic foot
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Limb discomfort
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung carcinoma cell type unspecified recurrent
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-small cell lung cancer
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer metastatic
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer stage unspecified
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery occlusion
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar haemorrhage
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Embolic stroke
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Facial palsy
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peroneal nerve palsy
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Malignant renal hypertension
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure chronic
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
2.3%
6/264 • Number of events 7 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Large intestine anastomosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial restenosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial stenosis limb
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis limb
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriosclerosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriovenous fistula
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Femoral arterial stenosis
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Femoral artery occlusion
|
1.1%
3/264 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.76%
2/264 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Iliac artery stenosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
|
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 20 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Leriche syndrome
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Malignant hypertension
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
4.2%
11/264 • Number of events 14 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery aneurysm
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery dissection
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
|
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
4.5%
12/264 • Number of events 17 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous stasis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Graft dysfunction
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery disease
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/264 • 3 Years
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.38%
1/264 • Number of events 1 • 3 Years
|
0.00%
0/61 • 3 Years
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Supera® Peripheral Stent System ITT
n=264 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System.
ITT population consisted of 264 subjects.
|
Supera® Peripheral Stent System Roll-in
n=61 participants at risk
Implantation of Supera stent using the Supera® Peripheral Stent System.
There were a total of 61 roll-in subjects.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
5.7%
15/264 • Number of events 16 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 22 • 3 Years
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haematoma
|
6.1%
16/264 • Number of events 17 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
7.6%
20/264 • Number of events 25 • 3 Years
|
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 6 • 3 Years
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
7.2%
19/264 • Number of events 21 • 3 Years
|
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 8 • 3 Years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent arterial restenosis
|
10.6%
28/264 • Number of events 37 • 3 Years
|
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 7 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
15.5%
41/264 • Number of events 51 • 3 Years
|
26.2%
16/61 • Number of events 20 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Femoral artery dissection
|
11.0%
29/264 • Number of events 32 • 3 Years
|
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 6 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
|
14.8%
39/264 • Number of events 52 • 3 Years
|
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 13 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
6.4%
17/264 • Number of events 22 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
6.1%
16/264 • Number of events 24 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.5%
4/264 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 15 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 6 • 3 Years
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.0%
8/264 • Number of events 9 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.5%
12/264 • Number of events 13 • 3 Years
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 5 • 3 Years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.2%
11/264 • Number of events 12 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
4.9%
13/264 • Number of events 13 • 3 Years
|
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 10 • 3 Years
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.7%
7/264 • Number of events 7 • 3 Years
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • 3 Years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.8%
10/264 • Number of events 11 • 3 Years
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • 3 Years
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60