Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tadalafil in Preventing Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy (NCT NCT00931528)

NCT ID: NCT00931528

Last Updated: 2018-02-14

Results Overview

EF is measured by Question 1 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks "How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity?" Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5 on IIEF Q1. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at this time point are also reported with this outcome measure.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

242 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 30 weeks from the start of radiation therapy

Results posted on

2018-02-14

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tadalafil
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
121
121
Overall Study
COMPLETED
80
61
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
41
60

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tadalafil
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
9
12
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
4
12
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
6
13
Overall Study
Assessment outside of Time Frame
22
23

Baseline Characteristics

Tadalafil in Preventing Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tadalafil
n=112 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=109 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Total
n=221 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
63 years
n=5 Participants
63 years
n=7 Participants
63 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
112 Participants
n=5 Participants
109 Participants
n=7 Participants
221 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks from the start of radiation therapy

Population: All randomized eligible patients with IIEF at both baseline and 30 week time point.

EF is measured by Question 1 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks "How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity?" Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5 on IIEF Q1. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at this time point are also reported with this outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=80 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT)
79 percentage of participants
Interval 70.0 to 88.0
74 percentage of participants
Interval 63.0 to 85.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 1 and 2 years from the start of tadalafil or placebo

Population: All randomized eligible patients with IIEF at both baseline and corresponding time point.

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks "How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity?" Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at Years 1 and 2 are also reported with this outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=109 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=108 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT
Year 1
72.2 percentage of participants
Interval 60.3 to 84.1
71.4 percentage of participants
Interval 58.7 to 84.1
Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT
Year 2
68.4 percentage of participants
Interval 56.3 to 80.5
63.3 percentage of participants
Interval 49.8 to 76.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30, and years 1 and 2 from start of treatment

Population: Eligible patients with IIEF at baseline and corresponding time points.

The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. A score of 0-5 is given to each of the 15 questions that examine 5 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Domain scores are the sum of each item. The erectile function domain has 5 items with a score range of 1-30, orgasmic function has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, sexual desire has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, intercourse satisfaction has 3 items with a score range of 0-15, and overall satisfaction has 2 items with a score range of 2-10. Total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from baseline is calculated by subtracting baseline score from score at the time point of interest.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=109 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=108 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Week 30
-8.2 change in total IIEF
Standard Deviation 15.4
-9.0 change in total IIEF
Standard Deviation 17.0
Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Year 1
-9.5 change in total IIEF
Standard Deviation 14.8
-10.5 change in total IIEF
Standard Deviation 18.4
Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Year 2
-9.7 change in total IIEF
Standard Deviation 15.7
-14.1 change in total IIEF
Standard Deviation 20.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

Population: Eligible patients with data at baseline and corresponding time point

The Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 20-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 8 and 100 including the following domains: desire, ranging between 5 and 30; dysfunction, 0 and 25; activity, 0 and 10; satisfaction, 1 and 10; and fatigue, 1 and 5. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=63 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score
Week 30
-2.0 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 11.3
-2.9 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 8.0
Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score
Year 1
-3.7 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 9.7
-4.9 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 9.9
Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score
Year 2
-3.4 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 9.3
-4.6 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 14.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

Population: Consenting partners of randomized eligible patients with data at baseline and corresponding time point

The SAQ-P is an 18-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 0 and 90 including the following domains: desire, dysfunction, activity, satisfaction, and fatigue. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=42 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score
Week 30
-4.9 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 7.5
-1.8 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 8.2
Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score
Year 1
-3.9 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 6.4
-2.5 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 7.1
Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score
Year 2
1.5 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 5.5
5.1 change in SAQ score
Standard Deviation 9.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

Population: Eligible patients with data at baseline and time point of interest.

The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=61 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Week 30
-3.5 change in LMAT score
Standard Deviation 7.7
-2.6 change in LMAT score
Standard Deviation 10.4
Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Year 1
-1.9 change in LMAT score
Standard Deviation 7.2
-1.9 change in LMAT score
Standard Deviation 6.3
Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Year 2
-1.3 change in LMAT score
Standard Deviation 9.87
-1.4 change in LMAT score
Standard Deviation 5.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

Population: Consenting spouses of randomized, eligible patients with data at baseline and time point of interest

The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tadalafil
n=34 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Week 30
-1.5 change in LMAT score
Standard Error 6.3
-2.6 change in LMAT score
Standard Error 6.4
Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Year 1
-2.3 change in LMAT score
Standard Error 5.1
1.2 change in LMAT score
Standard Error 7.3
Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Year 2
-2.8 change in LMAT score
Standard Error 5.8
-4.7 change in LMAT score
Standard Error 7.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Tadalafil

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 85 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 76 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Tadalafil
n=111 participants at risk
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=108 participants at risk
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.93%
1/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
0.00%
0/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.93%
1/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Chills
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Investigations - Other
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Weight loss
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.00%
0/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.93%
1/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.90%
1/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.93%
1/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic event
0.00%
0/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.93%
1/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Visceral arterial ischemia
0.00%
0/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.93%
1/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Tadalafil
n=111 participants at risk
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo
n=108 participants at risk
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
16.2%
18/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
9.3%
10/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders - Other
6.3%
7/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
1.9%
2/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Fatigue
27.0%
30/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
25.9%
28/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
5.4%
6/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
3.7%
4/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
8.1%
9/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
3.7%
4/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis noninfective
6.3%
7/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
9.3%
10/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal and urinary disorders - Other
19.8%
22/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
19.4%
21/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary frequency
49.5%
55/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
46.3%
50/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
15.3%
17/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
17.6%
19/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract pain
13.5%
15/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
13.0%
14/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary urgency
32.4%
36/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
20.4%
22/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ejaculation disorder
6.3%
7/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
5.6%
6/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
30.6%
34/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
28.7%
31/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Reproductive system and breast disorders - Other
5.4%
6/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
5.4%
6/111
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
1.9%
2/108
Adverse event (AE) data is reported for eligible patients with adverse event data. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.

Additional Information

Wendy Seiferheld

NRG Onoclogy

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI's are required to abide by the sponsor's publication guidelines which require review by coauthors and subsequent review and approval by the sponsor.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER