Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of the DTS-G2 System in Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis (NCT NCT00931359)
NCT ID: NCT00931359
Last Updated: 2011-06-15
Results Overview
The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating on the quality of life. It is a 4-point scale, with the following descriptors: 1. \- My underarm sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2. \- My underarm sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3. \- My underarm sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4. \- My underarm sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
30 days post-treatment
2011-06-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
39
|
81
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
33
|
68
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of the DTS-G2 System in Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
n=39 Participants
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
n=81 Participants
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
39 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
34.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=93 Participants
|
32.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=4 Participants
|
32.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
39 participants
n=93 Participants
|
81 participants
n=4 Participants
|
120 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days post-treatmentPopulation: Intent to Treat Population was used. Last Observation Carry Forward was used for missing data.
The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating on the quality of life. It is a 4-point scale, with the following descriptors: 1. \- My underarm sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2. \- My underarm sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3. \- My underarm sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4. \- My underarm sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
n=39 Participants
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
n=81 Participants
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at 30 Days.
|
54 Percentage of Participants
|
89 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months post-treatmentThe Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating on the quality of life. It is a 4-point scale, with the following descriptors: 1. \- My underarm sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2. \- My underarm sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3. \- My underarm sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4. \- My underarm sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
n=39 Participants
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
n=81 Participants
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 6 Month Follow-up Visit.
|
44 Percentage of Participants
|
67 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Sham group subjects exited the study after the 6 month follow-up visit, so were not in the study at this timepoint.
The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a 4-point validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating. 1. \- My underarm sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2. \- My underarm sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3. \- My underarm sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4. \- My underarm sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities This outcome is only measured for the treatment group; sham group exited the study after 6 month visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
n=81 Participants
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Treatment Group Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 12 Month Visit
|
—
|
69 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months post-treatmentAdverse events were defined in the protocol and included anticipated side effects of the procedure. These events were tracked by the clinical site and did include subject-reported events. The events reported here only included side effects that were attributed by the principal investigator as being possibly to definitely related to the device or procedure. They did not include expected treatment effects, such as swelling or bruising in the treatment area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
n=39 Participants
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
n=81 Participants
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events
|
13 Percentage of Participants
|
28 Percentage of Participants
|
Adverse Events
Sham Treatment
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sham Treatment
n=39 participants at risk
Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions.
|
Treatment With DTS-G2 System
n=81 participants at risk
Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Altered sensation
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Sham group subjects followed for 6 months post-treatment. Treatment group subjects followed for 12 months post-treatment
Only adverse events judged by investigator as being possibly, to definitely related to the device or procedure are listed.
|
9.9%
8/81 • Number of events 9 • Sham group subjects followed for 6 months post-treatment. Treatment group subjects followed for 12 months post-treatment
Only adverse events judged by investigator as being possibly, to definitely related to the device or procedure are listed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pain/soreness
|
5.1%
2/39 • Number of events 2 • Sham group subjects followed for 6 months post-treatment. Treatment group subjects followed for 12 months post-treatment
Only adverse events judged by investigator as being possibly, to definitely related to the device or procedure are listed.
|
6.2%
5/81 • Number of events 6 • Sham group subjects followed for 6 months post-treatment. Treatment group subjects followed for 12 months post-treatment
Only adverse events judged by investigator as being possibly, to definitely related to the device or procedure are listed.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60