Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial of Continuous Versus Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy (NCT NCT00928499)

NCT ID: NCT00928499

Last Updated: 2021-10-06

Results Overview

Collected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

32 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

After 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completed

Results posted on

2021-10-06

Participant Flow

Medical clinic over the course of 2 years

No participants were excluded.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Continuous Stimulation First, Then Cyclic Stimulation
Continuous stimulation first, then cyclic stimulation Interstim (SNS) : Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
Cyclic Stimulation First, Then Continuous Stimulation
Cyclic stimulation first, then continuous stimulation Interstim (SNS) : Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
Overall Study
STARTED
18
14
Overall Study
COMPLETED
18
14
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Trial of Continuous Versus Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Interstim - Continuous Stimulation First, Then Cyclic Stimulation
n=18 Participants
Continuous stimulation Interstim (SNS) : Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
Interstim - Cyclic Stimulation First, Then Continuous Stimulation
n=14 Participants
Cyclic stimulation Interstim (SNS) : Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=5 Participants
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants
n=5 Participants
14 participants
n=7 Participants
32 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: After 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completed

Population: Data was insufficient to be analyzed and therefore no resulting data was collected.

Collected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: After 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completed

Population: Data was insufficient to be analyzed and therefore no resulting data was collected.

Collected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Interstim - Continuous, Then Cyclic

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Interstim - Cyclic, Then Continuous

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Karen Noblett, MD

University of California, Irvine

Phone: 714-456-8564

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place