Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of the Intradermal Injection of rHuPH20 or Placebo in Participants With Nickel Allergic Contact Dermatitis (NCT NCT00928447)
NCT ID: NCT00928447
Last Updated: 2021-12-17
Results Overview
Cutaneous reactions at the patch test sites were scored according to the ICDRG scoring scale as Grade 0 (-)= Negative reaction, Grade 1/2 (?)= Doubtful reaction; faint macular erythema only, Grade 1 (1+)= Weak (nonvesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 2 (2+): Strong (vesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 3 (3+): Extreme positive reaction; bullous reaction Grade NA (IR): Irritant reaction of different types. Participants with positive reaction scores (\>= Grade 1) have been reported in this outcome measure.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
22 participants
Day 3 (48 hours post-dose after the patch removal for Regimen 1) up to Day 14
2021-12-17
Participant Flow
Participants with a known history of nickel allergy were recruited. At screening, the nickel sulfate concentration (1%, 2.5%, or 5%), applied to the skin of the upper back with a patch, that caused no more than a ++ reaction according to the scale of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) was determined. This concentration was used to elicit cutaneous reactions during the study period.
This study involved 2 regimens which ran in parallel. Each participant's upper back was divided into 2 equal spaces for Regimen 1 and 2. Each of the 4 treatment sites in each space was independently randomized to placebo or rHuPH20 treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Thus, each participant served as their own control.
Unit of analysis: Patch
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 milliliters (mL) intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 units \[U\]) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22 176
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of rHuPH20
|
21 168
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of Placebo
|
21 168
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20 160
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2 16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 milliliters (mL) intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 units \[U\]) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator's decision
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of the Intradermal Injection of rHuPH20 or Placebo in Participants With Nickel Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=22 Participants
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.34 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 (48 hours post-dose after the patch removal for Regimen 1) up to Day 14Population: The Evaluable population included all evaluable participants who had completed dosing (or prematurely discontinued the administration due to a toxicity) and had undergone sufficient assessments to allow an assessment of the tolerability of the administration.
Cutaneous reactions at the patch test sites were scored according to the ICDRG scoring scale as Grade 0 (-)= Negative reaction, Grade 1/2 (?)= Doubtful reaction; faint macular erythema only, Grade 1 (1+)= Weak (nonvesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 2 (2+): Strong (vesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 3 (3+): Extreme positive reaction; bullous reaction Grade NA (IR): Irritant reaction of different types. Participants with positive reaction scores (\>= Grade 1) have been reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=20 Participants
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Reaction Scores Based Upon ICDRG Scoring Scale: Regimen 1
rHuPH20
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Reaction Scores Based Upon ICDRG Scoring Scale: Regimen 1
Placebo
|
9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 (48 hours post-dose after the patch removal for Regimen 2) up to Day 14Population: The Evaluable population included all evaluable participants who had completed dosing (or prematurely discontinued the administration due to a toxicity) and had undergone sufficient assessments to allow an assessment of the tolerability of the administration.
Cutaneous reactions at the patch test sites were scored according to the ICDRG scoring scale as Grade 0 (-)= Negative reaction, Grade 1/2 (?)= Doubtful reaction; faint macular erythema only, Grade 1 (1+)= Weak (nonvesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 2 (2+): Strong (vesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 3 (3+): Extreme positive reaction; bullous reaction Grade NA (IR): Irritant reaction of different types. Participants with positive reaction scores (\>= Grade 1) have been reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=20 Participants
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Reaction Scores Based Upon ICDRG Scoring Scale: Regimen 2
rHuPH20
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Reaction Scores Based Upon ICDRG Scoring Scale: Regimen 2
Placebo
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 (48 hours post-dose after the patch removal for Regimen 1)Population: The Evaluable population included all evaluable participants who had completed dosing (or prematurely discontinued the administration due to a toxicity) and had undergone sufficient assessments to allow an assessment of the tolerability of the administration.
Cutaneous reactions at the patch test sites were scored according to the ICDRG scoring scale as Grade 0 (-)= Negative reaction, Grade 1/2 (?)= Doubtful reaction; faint macular erythema only, Grade 1 (1+)= Weak (nonvesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 2 (2+): Strong (vesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 3 (3+): Extreme positive reaction; bullous reaction Grade NA (IR): Irritant reaction of different types.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=20 Participants
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a >=1 Grade Change in ICDRG Score in at Least One Patch Region After Treatment With rHuPH20 or Placebo: Regimen 1
rHuPH20
|
70 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a >=1 Grade Change in ICDRG Score in at Least One Patch Region After Treatment With rHuPH20 or Placebo: Regimen 1
Placebo
|
75 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 (48 hours post-dose after the patch removal for Regimen 2)Population: The Evaluable population included all evaluable participants who had completed dosing (or prematurely discontinued the administration due to a toxicity) and had undergone sufficient assessments to allow an assessment of the tolerability of the administration.
Cutaneous reactions at the patch test sites were scored according to the ICDRG scoring scale as Grade 0 (-)= Negative reaction, Grade 1/2 (?)= Doubtful reaction; faint macular erythema only, Grade 1 (1+)= Weak (nonvesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 2 (2+): Strong (vesicular) positive reaction; erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles, Grade 3 (3+): Extreme positive reaction; bullous reaction Grade NA (IR): Irritant reaction of different types.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=20 Participants
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a >=1 Grade Change in ICDRG Score in at Least One Patch Region After Treatment With rHuPH20 or Placebo: Regimen 2
rHuPH20
|
95 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a >=1 Grade Change in ICDRG Score in at Least One Patch Region After Treatment With rHuPH20 or Placebo: Regimen 2
Placebo
|
90 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 14Population: The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) with an onset during or following administration of the first dose of study drug. AEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. SAEs were defined as any AE that, in the view of either the Investigator or Sponsor, resulted in any of the following outcomes as fatal, life-threatening, required in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, an important medical event. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen. A summary of all SAEs and Other AEs (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=21 Participants
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAEs
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Overall Study (rHuPH20 and Placebo)
n=21 participants at risk
Participant's upper back was divided into two equal spaces and received Regimen 1 and 2 in 4 spaces respectively. In Regimen 1, a single row of 4 patches, each with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening, was applied to the upper space at Day 1. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions were graded on the ICDRG scale. A 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient) was administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction. In Regimen 2, a single row of 4 sites in the lower space was injected intradermally with 0.25 mL of study material drug rHuPH20 (3,000 U) or placebo (excipient), in a randomly assigned 2:2 ratio at Day 1. Exactly ten minutes after the injections, patches with the nickel sulfate concentration (1, 2.5, or 5%) determined at screening were applied to the injection sites. After 48 hours (Day 3), the patches were removed and the reactions graded on the ICDRG scale. As during pretreatment, a 0.25 mL intradermal injection containing rHuPH20 or placebo was then administered once daily for 5 days at the center of each area of reaction.
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
100.0%
21/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
85.7%
18/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site discomfort
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haematoma
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site irritation
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling hot
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
47.6%
10/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sensation of heaviness
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hyperventilation
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Day 14
The Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse Events were only monitored/assessed on the whole participant level irrespective of different treatment regimen.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PI must submit a copy of the proposed publication to the Sponsor 30 days prior to date of submission for publication. They can request a delay of up to 90 days if it is determined there is any patentable subject matter or confidential Information. Sponsor can make changes to the communication to remove sponsor's confidential information from it prior to publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER