Trial Outcomes & Findings for Stepped Care to Optimize Pain Care Effectiveness (NCT NCT00926588)

NCT ID: NCT00926588

Last Updated: 2015-08-07

Results Overview

The full scale name is the Brief Pain Inventory. This 11-item scale measures self-reported pain severity and interference. It consists of 4 pain severity items and 7 pain interference items. Each item is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain imaginable). There is a pain severity score (average of 4 pain severity items), pain interference score (average of 7 pain interference items), and total pain score (average of all 11 items). For all 3 scores, 0 represents the best score (i.e., least pain) and 10 represents the worst score (i.e., greatest pain).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

250 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 year

Results posted on

2015-08-07

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from June 2010 through May 2012. Patients and physicians in 5 primary care clinics in the Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center in Indianapolis participated.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Stepped Care
Patients received automated pain monitoring. A nurse care manager partnering with a physician pain specialist decide on treatment changes collaborating with primary care physicians. Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are used. Stepped care: Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are new tools developed for this study.
Usual Care
Patients receive usual care for pain from their primary care physician
Overall Study
STARTED
124
126
Overall Study
COMPLETED
116
122
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
8
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Stepped Care to Optimize Pain Care Effectiveness

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Stepped Care
n=124 Participants
Patients received automated pain monitoring. A nurse care manager partnering with a physician pain specialist decide on treatment changes collaborating with primary care physicians. Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are used. Stepped care: Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are new tools developed for this study.
Usual Care
n=126 Participants
Patients receive usual care for pain from their primary care physician
Total
n=250 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
250 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
109 Participants
n=5 Participants
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
103 Participants
n=7 Participants
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
124 participants
n=5 Participants
126 participants
n=7 Participants
250 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 year

The full scale name is the Brief Pain Inventory. This 11-item scale measures self-reported pain severity and interference. It consists of 4 pain severity items and 7 pain interference items. Each item is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain imaginable). There is a pain severity score (average of 4 pain severity items), pain interference score (average of 7 pain interference items), and total pain score (average of all 11 items). For all 3 scores, 0 represents the best score (i.e., least pain) and 10 represents the worst score (i.e., greatest pain).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Stepped Care
n=124 Participants
Patients received automated pain monitoring. A nurse care manager partnering with a physician pain specialist decide on treatment changes collaborating with primary care physicians. Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are used. Stepped care: Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are new tools developed for this study.
Usual Care
n=126 Participants
Patients receive usual care for pain from their primary care physician
Brief Pain Inventory (Pain)
3.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
4.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13

Adverse Events

Stepped Care

Serious events: 22 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Usual Care

Serious events: 8 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Stepped Care
n=124 participants at risk
Patients received automated pain monitoring. A nurse care manager partnering with a physician pain specialist decide on treatment changes collaborating with primary care physicians. Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are used. Stepped care: Structured algorithms for stepped care analgesic management and explicit decision rules for adjusting treatment are new tools developed for this study.
Usual Care
n=126 participants at risk
Patients receive usual care for pain from their primary care physician
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia hospitalization
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gall bladder removal surgery
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac hospitalization
4.0%
5/124
0.79%
1/126
Infections and infestations
Hospitalization due to infection
1.6%
2/124
0.00%
0/126
Nervous system disorders
TIA hospitalization
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
Psychiatric disorders
Stress center hospitalization
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
Surgical and medical procedures
Sinus surgery hospitalization
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
Renal and urinary disorders
Hospitalization due to renal failure
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hospitalization due to knee replacement
2.4%
3/124
0.00%
0/126
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hospitalization due to motor vehicle accident
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder repair surgery and hospitalization
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization due to removal of fibroids
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Hospitalization due to planned hysterectomy
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization due to appendicitis
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization due to esophagogastrectomy
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
General disorders
Hospitalization due to hypotension, headache, muscle ache
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Psychiatric disorders
Mental Health referral due to suicidality
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization due to coronary artery bypass surgery
1.6%
2/124
0.00%
0/126
Psychiatric disorders
Subject suicidal ideation
0.00%
0/124
0.79%
1/126
General disorders
Death
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hospitalization due to sepsis
0.81%
1/124
0.00%
0/126

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Kurt Kroenke

VA HSRD

Phone: 317-988-3476

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place