Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long Term Safety Study of Tanezumab in Chronic Low Back Pain (NCT NCT00924664)
NCT ID: NCT00924664
Last Updated: 2021-04-21
Results Overview
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
849 participants
A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24
2021-04-21
Participant Flow
Participants who received study drug in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187) were eligible to be enrolled in this study, either at preferred rollover visit(Day 113) or due to early discontinuation in parent study for lack of efficacy. Dosing interval between last dose in parent study and first dose in this study was not less than 8 weeks and not more than 12 weeks.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
322
|
527
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
321
|
527
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
322
|
527
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
23
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
10
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
47
|
71
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
|
199
|
330
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
29
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but not Treated
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Long Term Safety Study of Tanezumab in Chronic Low Back Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
Total
n=848 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
|
182 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
300 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
482 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Greater than (>) 64 years
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
167 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
277 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
444 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
154 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
250 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
404 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to 112 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 448 days)Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
198 Participants
|
370 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
15 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4
Baseline
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4
Change at Week 4
|
0.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=295 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8
|
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=270 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 16
|
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=226 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=369 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 24
|
0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=149 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=241 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 32
|
0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=69 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=143 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 40
|
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=51 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 48
|
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 56 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.
NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 56
|
—
|
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Worst Pain
|
7.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
7.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Least Pain
|
5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
4.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Average Pain
|
6.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Pain right now
|
6.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
6.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Worst Pain
|
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
-3.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Least Pain
|
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
-2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Average Pain
|
-3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Pain right now
|
-3.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
-3.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=479 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Worst Pain
|
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Least Pain
|
-2.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
-2.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Average Pain
|
-2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Pain right now
|
-3.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
-3.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=378 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Worst Pain
|
-3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
-3.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Least Pain
|
-2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Average Pain
|
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Pain right now
|
-3.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=155 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=258 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Worst Pain
|
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
-3.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Least Pain
|
-2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
-2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Average Pain
|
-3.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
-3.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Pain right now
|
-3.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
-3.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=128 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Worst Pain
|
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
-3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Least Pain
|
-2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
|
-2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Average Pain
|
-2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
-3.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Pain right now
|
-3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
-3.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Worst Pain
|
-3.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
-3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Least Pain
|
-2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Average Pain
|
-2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.01
|
-2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Pain right now
|
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.60
|
-3.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Worst Pain
|
—
|
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Least Pain
|
—
|
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Average Pain
|
—
|
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Pain right now
|
—
|
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=525 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Composite score
|
5.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
5.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: General Activity
|
-3.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Walking Ability
|
-2.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
|
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Normal Work
|
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
-3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: General Activity
|
5.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
5.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.10
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Walking Ability
|
5.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
5.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Normal Work
|
5.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
5.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Sleep
|
5.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
5.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Sleep
|
-3.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.13
|
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Composite score
|
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
-3.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=478 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: General Activity
|
-2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Walking Ability
|
-2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Normal Work
|
-2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
-3.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Sleep
|
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.06
|
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Composite score
|
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=376 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: General Activity
|
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Walking Ability
|
-2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Normal Work
|
-2.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Sleep
|
-3.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Composite score
|
-2.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=155 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=256 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: General Activity
|
-3.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
-3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Walking Ability
|
-2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
-2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Normal Work
|
-3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
-3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Sleep
|
-3.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.91
|
-3.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Composite score
|
-2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
-3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=127 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: General Activity
|
-2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.21
|
-3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Walking Ability
|
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.26
|
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Normal Work
|
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
|
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Sleep
|
-3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.22
|
-3.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.91
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Composite score
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
|
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: General Activity
|
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.04
|
-2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Walking Ability
|
-2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
-2.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Normal Work
|
-2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Sleep
|
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.72
|
-3.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Composite score
|
-2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
|
-2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: General Activity
|
—
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Walking Ability
|
—
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Normal Work
|
—
|
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Sleep
|
—
|
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Composite score
|
—
|
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score was calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=525 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4
Baseline
|
13.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.13
|
12.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.85
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4
Change at Week 4
|
-5.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.73
|
-5.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.47
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=245 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=399 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 8
|
-4.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
|
-5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.71
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=202 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 16
|
-4.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.84
|
-5.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.36
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=126 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=210 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 24
|
-4.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
-5.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.61
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=107 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 32
|
-5.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
-5.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=32 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 40
|
-6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
-4.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 48
|
—
|
-2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4
Baseline
|
3.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4
Change at Week 4
|
-1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 8
|
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=376 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 16
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=154 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=258 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 24
|
-1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=128 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 32
|
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 40
|
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 48
|
—
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
NA days
Median and full range were not evaluable since very few participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy.
|
NA days
Median and full range were not evaluable since very few participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64Population: Pharmacokinetic(PK) analysis set: participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039(NCT00924664), had at least 1 plasma concentration value above LLOQ. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this measure, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively. Due to clinical hold, study was terminated prematurely, data was not collected at Week 64.
Analysis was done by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to zero.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=268 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=433 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Baseline
|
393.519 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 659.8150
|
427.871 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 771.2499
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 8
|
596.957 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 533.8274
|
1074.76 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 527.5588
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 24
|
588.216 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 296.7509
|
1276.75 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 770.0278
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 40
|
542.571 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 240.5285
|
1058.92 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 666.4789
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 56
|
250.512 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 393.9501
|
502.320 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 676.1049
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively. Data was not collected at Week 64 since assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=270 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=430 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 8
|
3771.1 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1472.3
|
4470.2 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1773.6
|
|
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Baseline
|
2599.9 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1893.7
|
2025.4 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2281.4
|
|
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 24
|
4132.7 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1780.1
|
4860.6 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1990.6
|
|
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 40
|
4314.0 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1372.4
|
4446.7 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1807.1
|
|
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 56
|
2855.5 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1651.8
|
3639.3 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1990.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics and muscle relaxants were permitted as concomitant medications for CLBP and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids, and viscosupplementation (eg, hyaluronan).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Using Concomitant Medication for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
|
150 Participants
|
268 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24, 56Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
WPAI:SHP: 6-item, binary question on current employment, 3 questions on hours of work and work-loss, 2 questions based on 0-10 point scale to judge how CLBP affects ability to work, perform regular activities(0=no effect on work/activity, 10=completely prevented from working/activity). Four scores derived as percent: activity impairment, impairment while working, overall work impairment, work time missed. Total possible score: 0-100 (0=no impairment/high productivity, 100=completely impaired/low activity). Each of 4 scores expressed as impairment percentages, high percentage=more impairment, less productivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:impairment during work
|
48.77 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.56
|
47.98 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.66
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:activity impairment
|
58.19 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.05
|
58.74 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 21.24
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:overall impairment
|
8.23 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.11
|
7.46 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 21.97
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:work time missed
|
2.99 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 10.81
|
2.27 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:activity impairment
|
-25.29 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 27.64
|
-26.34 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 28.55
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:impairment during work
|
-26.30 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 24.79
|
-21.36 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 26.84
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:overall impairment
|
-4.63 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.62
|
-3.25 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 21.39
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:work time missed
|
-1.49 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
-0.50 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 8.24
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:activity impairment
|
—
|
-8.00 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 34.58
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:impairment during work
|
—
|
-10.00 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 28.28
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:overall impairment
|
—
|
1.75 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 16.76
|
|
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:work time missed
|
—
|
1.41 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 4.71
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this measure at any time point. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm, respectively. Data was not analyzed at Week 64 since safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=269 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=435 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Baseline
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 8
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 24
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 40
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 56
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 for intravenous infusion; Week 24, 32, 40, 56, 64 for subcutaneous injectionPopulation: ITT analysis set. Data was not analyzed at Week 64 for SC injection since safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.
The injection and infusion site reactions were assessed based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after administration (not related to needle insertion pain) of subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Baseline: Infusion site
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 4: Infusion site
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 8: Infusion site
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 16: Infusion site
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 24: Infusion site
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 32: Infusion site
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 24: Injection site
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 32: Injection site
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 40: Injection site
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 56: Injection site
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 56Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).
Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of tanezumab received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of SC Doses: 3
|
1 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 1
|
59 Participants
|
102 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 2
|
93 Participants
|
145 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 3
|
169 Participants
|
276 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 4
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 5
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of SC Doses: 1
|
71 Participants
|
111 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of SC Doses: 2
|
8 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Tanezumab 10 mg
Tanezumab 20 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.38%
2/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Arnold-Chiari malformation
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforation
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon injury
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc degeneration
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.38%
2/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.93%
3/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.57%
3/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.62%
2/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.76%
4/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Liposarcoma
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.38%
2/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Multiple myeloma
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
|
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.9%
6/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
3.4%
18/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site reaction
|
3.7%
12/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
3.2%
17/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
3.4%
11/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
6.1%
32/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
1.6%
5/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.5%
13/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
3.7%
12/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.7%
14/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
3.4%
11/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
4.9%
26/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.8%
9/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.5%
13/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
2.2%
7/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.8%
15/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
2.5%
8/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
3.2%
17/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
12.8%
41/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
14.4%
76/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.1%
10/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
3.2%
17/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
1.9%
6/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
3.0%
16/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
2.2%
7/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.8%
15/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
4.4%
14/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
4.2%
22/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.9%
6/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
3.4%
18/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
2.8%
9/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.7%
14/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
3.7%
12/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
7.2%
38/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Allodynia
|
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.1%
11/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Decreased vibratory sense
|
0.62%
2/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.7%
14/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.1%
10/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
5.1%
27/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hyperaesthesia
|
0.93%
3/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.1%
11/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
7.2%
23/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
7.8%
41/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
9.7%
31/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
10.6%
56/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.62%
2/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
2.1%
11/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER