Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long Term Safety Study of Tanezumab in Chronic Low Back Pain (NCT NCT00924664)

NCT ID: NCT00924664

Last Updated: 2021-04-21

Results Overview

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

849 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Results posted on

2021-04-21

Participant Flow

Participants who received study drug in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187) were eligible to be enrolled in this study, either at preferred rollover visit(Day 113) or due to early discontinuation in parent study for lack of efficacy. Dosing interval between last dose in parent study and first dose in this study was not less than 8 weeks and not more than 12 weeks.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Overall Study
STARTED
322
527
Overall Study
Treated
321
527
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
322
527

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
23
39
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
10
15
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
10
12
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
47
71
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
2
5
Overall Study
Pregnancy
1
1
Overall Study
Death
0
2
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
199
330
Overall Study
Other
29
52
Overall Study
Randomized but not Treated
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Long Term Safety Study of Tanezumab in Chronic Low Back Pain

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Total
n=848 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
128 Participants
n=7 Participants
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
182 Participants
n=5 Participants
300 Participants
n=7 Participants
482 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than (>) 64 years
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
99 Participants
n=7 Participants
159 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
167 Participants
n=5 Participants
277 Participants
n=7 Participants
444 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
154 Participants
n=5 Participants
250 Participants
n=7 Participants
404 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 112 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 448 days)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
198 Participants
370 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
15 Participants
24 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4
Baseline
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4
Change at Week 4
0.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=295 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=270 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 16
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.75

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=226 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=369 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 24
0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=149 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=241 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 32
0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=69 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=143 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 40
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=51 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 48
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.19
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 56 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 56
—
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Worst Pain
7.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
7.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Least Pain
5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
4.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Average Pain
6.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Baseline: Pain right now
6.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.01
6.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Worst Pain
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
-3.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Least Pain
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
-2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Average Pain
-3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Pain right now
-3.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
-3.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=479 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Worst Pain
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Least Pain
-2.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
-2.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Average Pain
-2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Pain right now
-3.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
-3.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=378 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Worst Pain
-3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
-3.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Least Pain
-2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Average Pain
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Pain right now
-3.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=155 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=258 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Worst Pain
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
-3.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Least Pain
-2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
-2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Average Pain
-3.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
-3.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Pain right now
-3.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
-3.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=128 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Worst Pain
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
-3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Least Pain
-2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
-2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Average Pain
-2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
-3.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Pain right now
-3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
-3.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Worst Pain
-3.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
-3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Least Pain
-2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Average Pain
-2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.01
-2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Pain right now
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.60
-3.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Worst Pain
—
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Least Pain
—
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Average Pain
—
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Pain right now
—
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=525 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Composite score
5.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.11
5.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: General Activity
-3.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Walking Ability
-2.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Normal Work
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
-3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: General Activity
5.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
5.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.10
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Walking Ability
5.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
5.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Normal Work
5.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
5.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.11
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Baseline: Sleep
5.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
5.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Sleep
-3.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.13
-3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Composite score
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
-3.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.45

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=478 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: General Activity
-2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Walking Ability
-2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Normal Work
-2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
-3.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Sleep
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.06
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Composite score
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=376 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: General Activity
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Walking Ability
-2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Normal Work
-2.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Sleep
-3.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16
Change at Week 16: Composite score
-2.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=155 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=256 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: General Activity
-3.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
-3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Walking Ability
-2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
-2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Normal Work
-3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
-3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Sleep
-3.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.91
-3.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24
Change at Week 24: Composite score
-2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
-3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=127 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: General Activity
-2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.21
-3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Walking Ability
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.26
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Normal Work
-2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Sleep
-3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.22
-3.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.91
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32
Change at Week 32: Composite score
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: General Activity
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.04
-2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Walking Ability
-2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
-2.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Normal Work
-2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Sleep
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.72
-3.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40
Change at Week 40: Composite score
-2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
-2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: General Activity
—
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.21
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Walking Ability
—
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.21
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Normal Work
—
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Sleep
—
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48
Change at Week 48: Composite score
—
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score was calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=525 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4
Baseline
13.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.13
12.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.85
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4
Change at Week 4
-5.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.73
-5.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.47

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=245 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=399 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 8
-4.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
-5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.71

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=202 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 16
-4.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.84
-5.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.36

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=126 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=210 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 24
-4.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
-5.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.61

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=107 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 32
-5.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
-5.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=32 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 40
-6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
-4.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 48
—
-2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4
Baseline
3.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4
Change at Week 4
-1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 8
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=376 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 16
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
-1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=154 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=258 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 24
-1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=128 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 32
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 40
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
-0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 48
—
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
NA days
Median and full range were not evaluable since very few participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy.
NA days
Median and full range were not evaluable since very few participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64

Population: Pharmacokinetic(PK) analysis set: participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039(NCT00924664), had at least 1 plasma concentration value above LLOQ. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this measure, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively. Due to clinical hold, study was terminated prematurely, data was not collected at Week 64.

Analysis was done by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to zero.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=268 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=433 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Baseline
393.519 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 659.8150
427.871 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 771.2499
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 8
596.957 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 533.8274
1074.76 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 527.5588
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 24
588.216 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 296.7509
1276.75 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 770.0278
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 40
542.571 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 240.5285
1058.92 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 666.4789
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Week 56
250.512 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 393.9501
502.320 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 676.1049

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively. Data was not collected at Week 64 since assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=270 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=430 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 8
3771.1 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1472.3
4470.2 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1773.6
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Baseline
2599.9 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1893.7
2025.4 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2281.4
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 24
4132.7 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1780.1
4860.6 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1990.6
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 40
4314.0 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1372.4
4446.7 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1807.1
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Week 56
2855.5 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1651.8
3639.3 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1990.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics and muscle relaxants were permitted as concomitant medications for CLBP and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids, and viscosupplementation (eg, hyaluronan).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Number of Participants Using Concomitant Medication for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
150 Participants
268 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24, 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

WPAI:SHP: 6-item, binary question on current employment, 3 questions on hours of work and work-loss, 2 questions based on 0-10 point scale to judge how CLBP affects ability to work, perform regular activities(0=no effect on work/activity, 10=completely prevented from working/activity). Four scores derived as percent: activity impairment, impairment while working, overall work impairment, work time missed. Total possible score: 0-100 (0=no impairment/high productivity, 100=completely impaired/low activity). Each of 4 scores expressed as impairment percentages, high percentage=more impairment, less productivity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:impairment during work
48.77 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.56
47.98 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.66
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:activity impairment
58.19 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.05
58.74 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 21.24
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:overall impairment
8.23 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.11
7.46 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 21.97
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Baseline:work time missed
2.99 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 10.81
2.27 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 8.67
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:activity impairment
-25.29 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 27.64
-26.34 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 28.55
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:impairment during work
-26.30 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 24.79
-21.36 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 26.84
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:overall impairment
-4.63 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.62
-3.25 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 21.39
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 24:work time missed
-1.49 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 10.33
-0.50 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 8.24
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:activity impairment
—
-8.00 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 34.58
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:impairment during work
—
-10.00 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 28.28
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:overall impairment
—
1.75 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 16.76
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56
Change at Week 56:work time missed
—
1.41 percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 4.71

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this measure at any time point. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm, respectively. Data was not analyzed at Week 64 since safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=269 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=435 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Baseline
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 8
4 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 24
3 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 40
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Week 56
1 Participants
1 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 for intravenous infusion; Week 24, 32, 40, 56, 64 for subcutaneous injection

Population: ITT analysis set. Data was not analyzed at Week 64 for SC injection since safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

The injection and infusion site reactions were assessed based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after administration (not related to needle insertion pain) of subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Baseline: Infusion site
7 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 4: Infusion site
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 8: Infusion site
5 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 16: Infusion site
4 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 24: Infusion site
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 32: Infusion site
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 24: Injection site
2 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 32: Injection site
0 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 40: Injection site
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions
Week 56: Injection site
0 Participants
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of tanezumab received.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 Participants
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of SC Doses: 3
1 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 1
59 Participants
102 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 2
93 Participants
145 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 3
169 Participants
276 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 4
0 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of IV Doses: 5
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of SC Doses: 1
71 Participants
111 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
Number of SC Doses: 2
8 Participants
42 Participants

Adverse Events

Tanezumab 10 mg

Serious events: 15 serious events
Other events: 152 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Tanezumab 20 mg

Serious events: 24 serious events
Other events: 277 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.38%
2/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Arnold-Chiari malformation
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforation
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
General disorders
Death
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon injury
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc degeneration
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.38%
2/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.93%
3/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.57%
3/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
0.62%
2/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.76%
4/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Liposarcoma
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.38%
2/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Multiple myeloma
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
0.31%
1/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.00%
0/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
0.19%
1/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Tanezumab 10 mg
n=321 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
Tanezumab 20 mg
n=527 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
1.9%
6/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
3.4%
18/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
General disorders
Infusion site reaction
3.7%
12/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
3.2%
17/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
3.4%
11/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
6.1%
32/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
1.6%
5/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.5%
13/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
3.7%
12/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.7%
14/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
3.4%
11/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
4.9%
26/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
2.8%
9/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.5%
13/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
2.2%
7/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.8%
15/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
2.5%
8/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
3.2%
17/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
12.8%
41/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
14.4%
76/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
3.1%
10/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
3.2%
17/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
1.9%
6/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
3.0%
16/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
2.2%
7/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.8%
15/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
4.4%
14/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
4.2%
22/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
1.9%
6/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
3.4%
18/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
2.8%
9/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.7%
14/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
3.7%
12/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
7.2%
38/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Allodynia
0.00%
0/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.1%
11/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Decreased vibratory sense
0.62%
2/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.7%
14/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Headache
3.1%
10/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
5.1%
27/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Hyperaesthesia
0.93%
3/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.1%
11/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
7.2%
23/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
7.8%
41/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
9.7%
31/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
10.6%
56/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.62%
2/321
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
2.1%
11/527
Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee (2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER