Trial Outcomes & Findings for Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer (NCT NCT00924313)

NCT ID: NCT00924313

Last Updated: 2017-07-11

Results Overview

Standard uptake values (SUV) measurements of 11C-acetate will be obtained in each sextant (e.g. region) on each patient. Sextant-specific malignancy will be determined pathologically based on a subsequent prostatectomy. Initially, on each patient, we will, average SUV measurements in tumor and non-tumor regions (i.e., sextants with malignancy and no malignancy, respectively). The patient average SUV measurements across tumors and non-tumor regions will then be compared using a paired t-test.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

40 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2 years

Results posted on

2017-07-11

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Overall Study
STARTED
40
Overall Study
COMPLETED
39
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Overall Study
not imaged due to failed tracer imaging
1

Baseline Characteristics

One patient was not imaged due to failed tracer synthesis. One patient was not evaluable due to inadequate registration between the transmission scan and magnetic resonance imaging.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=40 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=40 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
33 Participants
n=40 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
n=40 Participants
Age, Continuous
58.97 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11 • n=40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants
n=40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants
n=40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants
n=40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 participants
n=40 Participants
Interval Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostatectomy
54 Days
n=38 Participants • One patient was not imaged due to failed tracer synthesis. One patient was not evaluable due to inadequate registration between the transmission scan and magnetic resonance imaging.
Days to Radical Prostatectomy
10.5 Days
n=38 Participants • One patient was not imaged due to failed tracer synthesis. One patient was not evaluable due to inadequate registration between the transmission scan and magnetic resonance imaging.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

Standard uptake values (SUV) measurements of 11C-acetate will be obtained in each sextant (e.g. region) on each patient. Sextant-specific malignancy will be determined pathologically based on a subsequent prostatectomy. Initially, on each patient, we will, average SUV measurements in tumor and non-tumor regions (i.e., sextants with malignancy and no malignancy, respectively). The patient average SUV measurements across tumors and non-tumor regions will then be compared using a paired t-test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=39 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Compare the Biodistribution of 11C-acetate Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging in Tumor and Non Tumorous Regions of the Prostate
Tumor region
4.4 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.05
Compare the Biodistribution of 11C-acetate Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging in Tumor and Non Tumorous Regions of the Prostate
Non-tumorous region
2.1 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.94

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=39 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Count of Participants With Adverse Events
14 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

The diagnostic accuracy of 11C-Acetate PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer was compared with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) using sector based analysis, generating receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves (plots of 1-specificity versus sensitivity) for both modalities.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Standardized Uptake Value of [11C]AC Obtained Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) for Detecting Region (Sextant)-Specific Malignancy Using Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) for a Lesion >0.9cm
PET specificity
80 Percentage ROC curve
Interval 78.0 to 82.0
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Standardized Uptake Value of [11C]AC Obtained Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) for Detecting Region (Sextant)-Specific Malignancy Using Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) for a Lesion >0.9cm
PET sensitivity
62 Percentage ROC curve
Interval 59.0 to 65.0
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Standardized Uptake Value of [11C]AC Obtained Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) for Detecting Region (Sextant)-Specific Malignancy Using Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) for a Lesion >0.9cm
MRI specificity
95 Percentage ROC curve
Interval 92.0 to 97.0
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Standardized Uptake Value of [11C]AC Obtained Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) for Detecting Region (Sextant)-Specific Malignancy Using Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) for a Lesion >0.9cm
MRI sensitivity
82.3 Percentage ROC curve
Interval 79.0 to 85.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

Pelvic biodistribution was obtained for the prostate tumor, normal prostate and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Uptake is expressed in standardized uptake value (SUV).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Pelvic Biodistribution of [11C]AC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging
Prostate tumor
4.4 SUV
Standard Deviation 2.05
Pelvic Biodistribution of [11C]AC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging
Normal tumor
2.1 SUV
Standard Deviation 0.943
Pelvic Biodistribution of [11C]AC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
4.8 SUV
Standard Deviation 2.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

Buildup of positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals excreted by the urinary system can accumulate in the bladder and limit pelvic imaging. This effect contributes to low physiologic distribution in the pelvis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Count of Participants With Physiological Effects of [11C]AC
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

Suspicious lesions noted on biopsy were compared with standard care imaging diagnostic modalities, additional biopsies, and/or clinical follow up performed at the discretion of the referring physician.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Incidence of Extraprostatic Lesions Accumulating [11C]AC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Detection
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

Intensity \[11C\]AC uptake with histopathologic Gleason grade were done with a Spearman rank correlation following prostatectomy. Two biopsies were performed and graded according to tumor pattern. The two grades were added together for a final Gleason score. Gleason score equal to or less than 3+4 is considered low risk. Gleason score equal to or greater than 4+3 is considered high-risk.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Grouping Tumors Based on Gleason Score
Gleason scores 3+4 and below
4.2 SUV
Standard Deviation 1.8
Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Grouping Tumors Based on Gleason Score
Gleason scores 4+3 and above
4.9 SUV
Standard Deviation 3.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

PET/CT, MP-MRI, DW-MRI, and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were used to detect lesion sensitivity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
Lesion Based Sensitivity Analysis Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT), Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MP-MRI), Diffusion Weighted-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI), and DCE-MRI.
PET/CT
73.4 percentage of sensitivity
Interval 70.0 to 75.0
Lesion Based Sensitivity Analysis Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT), Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MP-MRI), Diffusion Weighted-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI), and DCE-MRI.
MP-MRI
88.5 percentage of sensitivity
Interval 82.0 to 92.0
Lesion Based Sensitivity Analysis Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT), Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MP-MRI), Diffusion Weighted-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI), and DCE-MRI.
DW-MRI
80 percentage of sensitivity
Interval 76.0 to 85.0
Lesion Based Sensitivity Analysis Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT), Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MP-MRI), Diffusion Weighted-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI), and DCE-MRI.
DCE-MRI
55 percentage of sensitivity
Interval 50.0 to 61.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: One patient was not imaged because of failed tracer synthesis.

Tumor foci was histopathologically identified and tested to determine SUVmax relative to PSA levels. PSA normal range is 0-4ng/mL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=38 Participants
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
11C-Acetate Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)Max and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels Using Spearman Correlation
PSA level <4 ng/ml
3.7 SUVmax
Standard Deviation 2.0
11C-Acetate Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)Max and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels Using Spearman Correlation
PSA level 4-10 ng/ml
4.9 SUVmax
Standard Deviation 2.3
11C-Acetate Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)Max and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels Using Spearman Correlation
PSA level >10ng/ml
5.1 SUVmax
Standard Deviation 0.8

Adverse Events

11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
n=40 participants at risk
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
General disorders
Constitutional Symptoms-Other (Specify, Funny smell)
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Taste alteration (dysgeusia)
25.0%
10/40 • Number of events 10 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Nervous system disorders
Syncope (fainting)
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain: Back
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain: Extremity-limb
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • 2 years

Additional Information

Dr. Peter L. Choyke

National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Phone: 301-402-8409

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place