Outcome After Conservative and Surgical Treatment of Splenic Injuries After Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

NCT ID: NCT00910182

Last Updated: 2009-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Retrospective study in order to investigate the outcome after conservative (with or without transcatheter arterial embolization) and surgical treatment of splenic injuries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background

Splenic injuries after blunt abdominal trauma are treated with increasing frequency without operation. Patients undergo observation and bed rest. In certain circumstances an additional transcatheter arterial embolization is performed. It is uncertain which splenic ruptures (injury grades according to Moore) are best treated non-operatively and which are best treated with an emergency operation. Furthermore the value of organ-preserving surgery (splenorrhaphy) is uncertain. In addition, the importance of transcatheter arterial embolisation is unknown.

Objective

Evaluation of outcome (splenic salvage rate, complications, survival) after conservative and surgical treatment. Evaluation of the importance of organ-preserving surgery and of transcatheter arterial embolization.

Methods

All adult patients with splenic injuries after blunt abdominal trauma are included (2002-2008). The patients charts are studied and the following main information retrieved: age, gender, mechanism of accident, grade of splenic injury, concomitant injuries, patient management in the emergency department (fluid administration etc.), diagnostic methods (ultrasound, computed tomography), treatment modalities (bed rest, surgery, embolization), complications of treatment, re-operations, long-term outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Splenic Rupture Abdominal Injuries

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Splenic rupture abdominal injuries Surgery Angiography Embolisation Computed tomography Classification

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

all adult patients with splenic rupture after blunt abdominal injuries admitted to Bern University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2008 and treated non-operatively

No interventions assigned to this group

2

all adult patients with splenic rupture after blunt abdominal injuries admitted to Bern University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2008 who underwent emergency surgical treatment

splenorrhaphy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgical treatment of splenic injuries after blunt abdominal trauma.

3

all adult patients with splenic rupture after blunt abdominal injuries admitted to Bern University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2008 treated non-operatively plus transcatheter arterial embolisation

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

splenorrhaphy

surgical treatment of splenic injuries after blunt abdominal trauma.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* traumatic splenic rupture
* 16 years and older
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bern University Hospital, Departement of Visceral and Transplant Surgery

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pietro Renzulli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dep. of visceral and transplant surgery, Bern University Hospital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pachter HL, Spencer FC, Hofstetter SR, Liang HG, Hoballah J, Coppa GF. Experience with selective operative and nonoperative treatment of splenic injuries in 193 patients. Ann Surg. 1990 May;211(5):583-9; discussion 589-91. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199005000-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2339919 (View on PubMed)

Pachter HL, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR, Spencer FC. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management. Ann Surg. 1998 May;227(5):708-17; discussion 717-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9605662 (View on PubMed)

Watson GA, Rosengart MR, Zenati MS, Tsung A, Forsythe RM, Peitzman AB, Harbrecht BG. Nonoperative management of severe blunt splenic injury: are we getting better? J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1113-8; discussion 1118-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000241363.97619.d6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17099516 (View on PubMed)

Peitzman AB, Heil B, Rivera L, Federle MB, Harbrecht BG, Clancy KD, Croce M, Enderson BL, Morris JA, Shatz D, Meredith JW, Ochoa JB, Fakhry SM, Cushman JG, Minei JP, McCarthy M, Luchette FA, Townsend R, Tinkoff G, Block EF, Ross S, Frykberg ER, Bell RM, Davis F 3rd, Weireter L, Shapiro MB. Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional Study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma. 2000 Aug;49(2):177-87; discussion 187-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200008000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10963527 (View on PubMed)

Harbrecht BG, Peitzman AB, Rivera L, Heil B, Croce M, Morris JA Jr, Enderson BL, Kurek S, Pasquale M, Frykberg ER, Minei JP, Meredith JW, Young J, Kealey GP, Ross S, Luchette FA, McCarthy M, Davis F 3rd, Shatz D, Tinkoff G, Block EF, Cone JB, Jones LM, Chalifoux T, Federle MB, Clancy KD, Ochoa JB, Fakhry SM, Townsend R, Bell RM, Weireter L, Shapiro MB, Rogers F, Dunham CM, McAuley CE. Contribution of age and gender to outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults: multicenter study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma. J Trauma. 2001 Nov;51(5):887-95. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200111000-00010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11706335 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KEK 07-05-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id