Hernia Prevention in Stomas

NCT ID: NCT00907842

Last Updated: 2013-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Knowing that the risk of stoma associated herniation (parastomal or incisional) is 30-50% and the associated morbidity significant, standard placement of a prophylactic mesh upon stoma creation might prevent parastomal (or incisional herniation, after closure) and improve the quality of life of a large group of patients. This study is meant to be a pilot study to see whether the mesh related risks of infection and adhesion morbidity are acceptable if the mesh is placed intraperitoneally.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The idea of a prophylactic mesh has been tested before in a Swedish randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the mesh placed upon end colostomy formation. Results suggest this procedure is the panacea against stoma associated herniations. The investigators still have unanswered questions however, about the size and ideal position of the mesh, possible complications (infection, adhesions) and the benefit in terms of quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Incisional Hernia Parastomal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mesh placement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Parietex Parastomal Mesh

Intervention Type DEVICE

mesh placed intraperitoneally around the stoma

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Parietex Parastomal Mesh

mesh placed intraperitoneally around the stoma

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with a life expectancy of at least one year
* Temporary stoma formation
* Signed informed consent
* Elective surgery
* Clean-contaminated abdomen

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score IV or above
* Incapacitated adult or no signed informed consent
* Emergency procedure
* Contaminated or infected abdomen
* Residual intraperitoneal mesh
* Already injured part of the abdominal wall where the stoma will be sited
* Contraindication to laparoscopy
* Longterm use of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents
* Current antibiotic therapy
* One of the following conditions: immune deficiency, chemotherapy, ascites, peritoneal dialysis, pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Marc Schreinemacher

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marc Schreinemacher

investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicole Bouvy, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Marc Schreinemacher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):118-21; discussion 122-3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9785-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19011935 (View on PubMed)

Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO. Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Oct;49(10):1559-63. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0681-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17120189 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL27625.068.09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MEC09-2-052

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT02233465 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
The Permacol Dutch Cohort Study
NCT02166112 COMPLETED
Parastomal Reinforcement With Strattice
NCT00771407 COMPLETED PHASE4