Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Ablation or Escalated Drug Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00905853

Last Updated: 2016-07-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare aggressive antiarrhythmic therapy to catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients who have suffered prior myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optimal management of patients presenting with recurrent VT and receiving ICD therapy in spite of first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The hypothesis is catheter ablation is superior to aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy for recurrent VT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multicentre, parallel group, two arm, unblinded, randomized clinical trial to compare two management strategies for patients with ischemic heart disease and recurrent ICD therapy despite at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The primary endpoint will be a composite of appropriate ICD shocks or death.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Catheter ablation for Ventricular tachycardia will be performed within 14 days of randomization.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Catheter Ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intracardiac electrode catheters are placed via central vasculature to identify myocardial scar, and surviving conduction channels within the scar which form the substrate for ventricular tachycardia. Radiofrequency energy is applied to these sites, interrupting the VT circuits.

Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy

Patients are prescribed a loading dose of amiodarone or the addition of mexiletine to their current anti-arrhythmic medication which is stratified by the dose and type of antiarrhymic medication at the time of the index arrhythmic event.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escalated Antiarrhythmic Therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients who have 'failed' antiarrhythmic therapy (except amiodarone) will be prescribed: Amiodarone 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 200 mg/day thereafter.

Patients who 'failed' amiodarone (less than 300mg/day) will be prescribed: Amiodarone 400 mg three times a day for 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg/day for 1 week and 300 mg/day thereafter.

Patients who 'failed' amiodarone (greater or equal to 300mg/day) will be prescribed: Amiodarone at the current dose with the addition of mexiletine 400 to 800 mg/day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter Ablation

Intracardiac electrode catheters are placed via central vasculature to identify myocardial scar, and surviving conduction channels within the scar which form the substrate for ventricular tachycardia. Radiofrequency energy is applied to these sites, interrupting the VT circuits.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Escalated Antiarrhythmic Therapy

Patients who have 'failed' antiarrhythmic therapy (except amiodarone) will be prescribed: Amiodarone 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 200 mg/day thereafter.

Patients who 'failed' amiodarone (less than 300mg/day) will be prescribed: Amiodarone 400 mg three times a day for 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg/day for 1 week and 300 mg/day thereafter.

Patients who 'failed' amiodarone (greater or equal to 300mg/day) will be prescribed: Amiodarone at the current dose with the addition of mexiletine 400 to 800 mg/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VT Ablation Cordarone Mexetil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prior Myocardial Infarction
* An implantable defibrillator
* One of the following VT events (within the past 3 months):

* greater than or equal to 3 episodes of symptomatic VT treated with ATP
* greater than or equal to 1 appropriate ICD shock
* greater than or equal to 3 VT episodes within 24 hours
* sustained VT below detection rate of the ICD documented by ECG
* "Failed" first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy as defined by one of:

* Appropriate ICD therapy or sustained VT occurred while patient was taking amiodarone (stable dose \>/= 2 weeks)
* Appropriate ICD therapy or sustained VT occurred on another antiarrhythmic drug (stable dose \>/= 2 weeks)

Exclusion Criteria

* Active ischemia (acute thrombus, dynamic ST elevation on ECG) or another reversible cause of VT (eg. electrolyte abnormalities, drug induced arrhythmia)
* Are known to be ineligible to take amiodarone (eg. active hepatitis, current hyperthyroidism, pulmonary fibrosis, known allergy)
* Are ineligible for ablation (left ventricular thrombus, implanted mechanical aortic and mitral valves)
* Renal Failure (creatinine clearance \< 15 ml/min)
* Current NYHA functional class IV heart failure or CCS Functional Class IV angina
* Recent ST elevation myocardial infarction (\< 1 month)
* Recent coronary bypass surgery (\< 3 mon) or recent PCI (\< 1 mon)
* Pregnant
* prior ablation for ventricular tachycardia
* A systemic illness likely to limit survival to \< 1 year
* Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biosense Webster, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

John Sapp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Sapp

Staff physician, Division of Cardiology

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John L Sapp, BSc, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nova Scotia Health Authority

Ratika Parkash, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Nova Scotia Health Authority

Anthony S Tang, MSc, MD, FRCPC

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Royal Jubilee Hospital

George A Wells, BSc,MSc,PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Univeristy of Ottawa Heart Institute

William G Stevenson, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Parkash R, Nault I, Rivard L, Gula L, Essebag V, Nery P, Tung S, Raymond JM, Sterns L, Doucette S, Wells G, Tang ASL, Stevenson WG, Sapp JL. Effect of Baseline Antiarrhythmic Drug on Outcomes With Ablation in Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia: A VANISH Substudy (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005663. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005663.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29305400 (View on PubMed)

Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, Thibault B, Rivard L, Gula L, Leong-Sit P, Essebag V, Nery PB, Tung SK, Raymond JM, Sterns LD, Veenhuyzen GD, Healey JS, Redfearn D, Roux JF, Tang AS. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27149033 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sapp001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

VT Ablation in the iCMR
NCT05543798 RECRUITING NA
Complex Arrhythmia Registry
NCT07024927 NOT_YET_RECRUITING