Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study on the Implantation of the Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT-Secur) Under Local Anesthesia (NCT NCT00904618)
NCT ID: NCT00904618
Last Updated: 2009-05-19
Results Overview
Local anesthesia satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire completed by the patients. The patients were asked if they would recommend this type of anesthesia (yes or no).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
48 participants
Questionnaire filled 1 week after surgery
2009-05-19
Participant Flow
January 2007 to October 2008 at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TVT-SECUR
This study arm consisted of 48 women operated from January 2007 to October 2008. All patients underwent the implantation of the TVT-SECUR for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. The surgery was done under local anesthesia by one high-volume surgeon.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study on the Implantation of the Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT-Secur) Under Local Anesthesia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TVT-SECUR
n=48 Participants
This study arm consisted of 48 women operated from January 2007 to October 2008. All patients underwent the implantation of the TVT-SECUR for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. The surgery was done under local anesthesia by one high-volume surgeon.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Questionnaire filled 1 week after surgeryPopulation: 2 patients did not fill out the questionnaire 1 week after surgery
Local anesthesia satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire completed by the patients. The patients were asked if they would recommend this type of anesthesia (yes or no).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TVT-SECUR
n=46 Participants
This study arm consisted of 48 women operated from January 2007 to October 2008. All patients underwent the implantation of the TVT-SECUR for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. The surgery was done under local anesthesia by one high-volume surgeon.
|
U-Method
The U-Method is similar to the retropubic tape dissection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Local Anesthesia Satisfaction
Yes
|
43 participants
|
—
|
|
Local Anesthesia Satisfaction
No
|
3 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Six monthsPopulation: The 'Hammock' technique, similar to the transobturator tape dissection, was used in the first 23 cases and the 'U-Method', similar to the retropubic tape dissection, in the last 25 cases. Seven patients for the 'Hammock' technique and three patients for the 'U-Method' did not fill out the questionnaire at six months.
A questionnaire with a Likert scale from one to five was used to assess the improvement in stress urinary symptoms at six months for each technique, the 'Hammock' technique and the 'U-Method' (1-Worst, 2-Same, 3-Improved, 4-Almost cured, 5-Cured). Patients had to answer 3 or more on the scale to be considered improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TVT-SECUR
n=16 Participants
This study arm consisted of 48 women operated from January 2007 to October 2008. All patients underwent the implantation of the TVT-SECUR for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. The surgery was done under local anesthesia by one high-volume surgeon.
|
U-Method
n=22 Participants
The U-Method is similar to the retropubic tape dissection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.
Improved
|
11 participants
|
22 participants
|
|
Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.
Not improved
|
5 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 15 monthsPopulation: The 'Hammock' technique, similar to the transobturator tape dissection, was used in the first 23 cases and the 'U-Method', similar to the retropubic tape dissection, in the last 25 cases. Interim analysis performed after 23 cases led us to change the technique to the 'U-Method'.
Safety of the sling was assessed with a record of perioperative and postoperative complications. The following are all the complications experienced with the TVT-SECUR for each technique, the 'Hammock' technique and the 'U-Method'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TVT-SECUR
n=25 Participants
This study arm consisted of 48 women operated from January 2007 to October 2008. All patients underwent the implantation of the TVT-SECUR for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. The surgery was done under local anesthesia by one high-volume surgeon.
|
U-Method
n=23 Participants
The U-Method is similar to the retropubic tape dissection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety of the Sling.
Perioperative urethral laceration
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Safety of the Sling.
Postoperative vaginal erosions
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Safety of the Sling.
Postoperative transient urinary retention
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
TVT-SECUR
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Louis-Olivier Gagnon
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place