A Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of YM150 Compared to Enoxaparin in Subjects Undergoing Hip Replacement Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00902928

Last Updated: 2015-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1992 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various doses of YM150 (the experimental drug) compared to enoxaparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients that are undergoing elective hip replacement surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Thromboembolism Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1. YM150, Dose X, twice daily

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

YM150

Intervention Type DRUG

oral

2, YM150, Dose X, once daily

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

YM150

Intervention Type DRUG

oral

3. YM150, Dose Y, twice daily

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

YM150

Intervention Type DRUG

oral

4. YM150, Dose Y, once daily

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

YM150

Intervention Type DRUG

oral

5. Enoxaparin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

SC injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

YM150

oral

Intervention Type DRUG

enoxaparin

SC injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is scheduled for elective hip replacement surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has active bleeding or any condition associated with increased risk of bleeding
* Subject has had major trauma or surgery within 3 months before planned hip replacement surgery or requires major surgery or other invasive procedures with potential for uncontrolled bleeding during the study
* Subject has had an MI or stroke within 3 months before planned hip replacement surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Use Central Contact

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tuscon, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pinellas Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Windsor, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Foča, , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Site Status

Curitiba, Puerto Rico, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, So Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Burlington, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Site Status

Floridablanca, Santander Department, Colombia

Site Status

Barranquilla, , Colombia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Chomutov, , Czechia

Site Status

Havlíčkův Brod, , Czechia

Site Status

Jihlava, , Czechia

Site Status

Jindřichův Hradec, , Czechia

Site Status

Klatovy, , Czechia

Site Status

Liberec, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Třebíč, , Czechia

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Hørsholm, , Denmark

Site Status

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Kohtla-Järve, , Estonia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Jyväskylä, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Hyderabaad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Secunderabad, Andhra Prasdesh, India

Site Status

Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Site Status

Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India

Site Status

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Kormangala, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Site Status

Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Gjøvik, , Norway

Site Status

Kongsvinger, , Norway

Site Status

Lillehammer, , Norway

Site Status

Tynset, , Norway

Site Status

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Gmina Końskie, , Poland

Site Status

Głogów Małopolski, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Otwock, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Banska Bysterica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Kosice Saca, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Worcester, Cape Town, South Africa

Site Status

Benoni, , South Africa

Site Status

Bryanston, , South Africa

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Castelló, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Palma Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Kalmar, , Sweden

Site Status

Motala, , Sweden

Site Status

Mölndal, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Varberg, , Sweden

Site Status

Cherkassy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sevastopol, , Ukraine

Site Status

Epsom, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Northampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Canada Colombia Czechia Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Hungary India Israel Italy Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Romania Russia Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eriksson BI, Agnelli G, Gallus AS, Lassen MR, Prins MH, Renfurm RW, Kashiwa M, Turpie AG. Darexaban (YM150) versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a randomised phase IIb dose confirmation study (ONYX-3). Thromb Haemost. 2014 Feb;111(2):213-25. doi: 10.1160/TH13-04-0296. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24136153 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-004416-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

150-CL-040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.