Trial Outcomes & Findings for Inhaled GM-CSF Therapy of Autoimmune PAP (NCT NCT00901511)

NCT ID: NCT00901511

Last Updated: 2024-07-12

Results Overview

Time (in months) between the scheduled baseline WLL (at Study Month 0) and the first administration of an unscheduled rescue WLL (during the 30-months after Study Month 0)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

18 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

30 months

Results posted on

2024-07-12

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control Group
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without GM-CSF administration, followed by GM-CSF administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Overall Study
STARTED
9
9
Overall Study
COMPLETED
8
8
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Inhaled GM-CSF Therapy of Autoimmune PAP

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=5 Participants
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=7 Participants
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Time (in months) between the scheduled baseline WLL (at Study Month 0) and the first administration of an unscheduled rescue WLL (during the 30-months after Study Month 0)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Time to Rescue WLL
18 Months
Interval 6.0 to 27.0
30 Months
Interval 30.0 to 30.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Number of patients requiring an unscheduled rescue WLL during the 30-months immediately following administration of the scheduled baseline WLL therapy at Study Month 0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Number of Patients Requiring a Rescue WLL
7 participants
1 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in mean PaO2 at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in mean PaO2 at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, PaO2 is determined from lab values measured for an arterial blood gas procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
Pre-WLL ( Month -1)
51 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
66 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
Baseline (Month 0)
72 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15
82 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
1 month
70 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
88 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.4
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
3 months
68 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10
89 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
6 months
73 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11
92 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
10 months
73 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13
92 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
18 months
71 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
90 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16
Between-Group Difference in Mean Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
30 months
71 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
82 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in mean A-aDO2 at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in mean A-aDO2 at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last-value carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, A-aDO2 is calculated from lab values measured for an arterial blood gas, the ambient atmosphere pressure, and fraction of inspired oxygen at the time of the arterial blood gas procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
55 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11
43 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
Baseline (Month 0)
33 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15
26 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
1 month
37 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17
20 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
3 months
37 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
18 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.1
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
6 months
35 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
15 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
10 months
34 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13
18 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
18 months
35 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13
18 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13
Between-Group Difference in Mean Alveolar-arterial Difference in Oxygen Concentration (A-aDO2)
30 months
35 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13
24 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in mean DLCO at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in mean DLCO at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, DLCO is determined from pulmonary function tests.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
38 % predicted
Standard Deviation 14
46 % predicted
Standard Deviation 16
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
Baseline (Month 0)
50 % predicted
Standard Deviation 14
55 % predicted
Standard Deviation 14
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
1 Month
55 % predicted
Standard Deviation 13
68 % predicted
Standard Deviation 15
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
3 months
62 % predicted
Standard Deviation 16
72 % predicted
Standard Deviation 17
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
6 months
58 % predicted
Standard Deviation 20
71 % predicted
Standard Deviation 15
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
10 months
59 % predicted
Standard Deviation 20
70 % predicted
Standard Deviation 15
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
18 months
58 % predicted
Standard Deviation 21
71 % predicted
Standard Deviation 17
Between-Group Difference in Mean Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
30 months
59 % predicted
Standard Deviation 21
63 % predicted
Standard Deviation 16

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in mean VC at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in mean VC at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, VC is determined from pulmonary function tests.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
60 % predicted
Standard Deviation 16
64 % predicted
Standard Deviation 13
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
Baseline (Month 0)
74 % predicted
Standard Deviation 11
76 % predicted
Standard Deviation 17
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
1 month
75 % predicted
Standard Deviation 17
76 % predicted
Standard Deviation 16
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
3 months
78 % predicted
Standard Deviation 17
80 % predicted
Standard Deviation 15
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
6 months
78 % predicted
Standard Deviation 15
84 % predicted
Standard Deviation 20
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
10 months
78 % predicted
Standard Deviation 14
82 % predicted
Standard Deviation 18
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
18 months
78 % predicted
Standard Deviation 13
83 % predicted
Standard Deviation 21
Between-Group Difference in Mean Vital Capacity (VC)
30 months
77 % predicted
Standard Deviation 13
79 % predicted
Standard Deviation 17

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in median GGO Score at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in median GGO Score at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, the degree of severity of lung disease was calculated by determining the number of segments affected. The following scale was used: Grade 1 = 1 segment affected Grade 2 = 2 - 5 segments affected Grade 3 = 6 - 9 segments affected Grade 4 = 10 - 14 segments affected Grade 5 = \> 14 affected segments

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Chest Computed Tomography Ground Glass Opacification (GGO) Score
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
5 score on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 5.0
5 score on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 5.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Chest Computed Tomography Ground Glass Opacification (GGO) Score
3 months
4 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
3 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Chest Computed Tomography Ground Glass Opacification (GGO) Score
10 months
4 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
3 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Chest Computed Tomography Ground Glass Opacification (GGO) Score
18 months
4 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
3 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Chest Computed Tomography Ground Glass Opacification (GGO) Score
30 months
4 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
4 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 5.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in median serum CEA levels at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in serum CEA levels at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, the serum CEA levels were determined via enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
18 ng/ml
Interval 10.0 to 41.0
6 ng/ml
Interval 4.0 to 12.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
Baseline (Month 0)
8 ng/ml
Interval 7.0 to 17.0
5 ng/ml
Interval 3.0 to 9.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
1 month
6 ng/ml
Interval 5.0 to 21.0
3 ng/ml
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
3 months
8 ng/ml
Interval 4.0 to 22.0
4 ng/ml
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
6 months
10 ng/ml
Interval 4.0 to 21.0
3 ng/ml
Interval 2.0 to 3.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
10 months
9 ng/ml
Interval 4.0 to 21.0
2 ng/ml
Interval 2.0 to 3.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
18 months
9 ng/ml
Interval 5.0 to 19.0
3 ng/ml
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels
30 months
8 ng/ml
Interval 5.0 to 19.0
5 ng/ml
Interval 3.0 to 5.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in median serum KL-6 levels at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in serum KL-6 levels at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, the serum KL-6 levels were determined via enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
9023 U/ml
Interval 6660.0 to 19205.0
5758 U/ml
Interval 3247.0 to 7759.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
Baseline (Month 0)
10556 U/ml
Interval 6501.0 to 18734.0
5538 U/ml
Interval 1738.0 to 7287.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
1 month
8744 U/ml
Interval 6340.0 to 14413.0
2401 U/ml
Interval 1348.0 to 14828.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
3 months
6524 U/ml
Interval 2296.0 to 18562.0
2422 U/ml
Interval 718.0 to 11473.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
6 months
8934 U/ml
Interval 808.0 to 13494.0
2117 U/ml
Interval 648.0 to 29300.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
10 months
8116 U/ml
Interval 712.0 to 14141.0
6546 U/ml
Interval 1218.0 to 13697.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
18 months
7314 U/ml
Interval 1714.0 to 11335.0
3114 U/ml
Interval 1330.0 to 5742.0
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Krebs Von-Lungren 6 Antigen (KL-6) Levels
30 months
5755 U/ml
Interval 1714.0 to 8257.0
1448 U/ml
Interval 666.0 to 8539.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in mean serum Cyfra21.1 levels at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in serum Cyfra21.1 levels at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. For both of the primary and secondary analyses, the serum Cyfra21.1 levels were determined via enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
27 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 17
13 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 8
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
Baseline (Month 0)
10 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 6
6 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
1 month
11 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 7
5 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
3 months
10 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 5
5 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
6 months
9 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 7
4 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
10 months
9 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 6
4 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
18 months
8 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 7
4 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2
Between-Group Difference in Mean Serum Cytokeratin-19 Fragment (Cyfra21.1) Levels
30 months
8 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 7
5 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Analysis Method: Between-group difference in serum GMAb levels at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. The serum GMAb levels were determined via enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
23 mcg/ml
Interval 11.0 to 47.0
32 mcg/ml
Interval 18.0 to 59.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
Baseline (Month 0)
20 mcg/ml
Interval 9.0 to 27.0
28 mcg/ml
Interval 19.0 to 61.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
1 month
25 mcg/ml
Interval 12.0 to 48.0
30 mcg/ml
Interval 17.0 to 59.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
3 months
27 mcg/ml
Interval 10.0 to 47.0
34 mcg/ml
Interval 26.0 to 62.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
6 months
22 mcg/ml
Interval 10.0 to 54.0
36 mcg/ml
Interval 23.0 to 51.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
10 months
22 mcg/ml
Interval 10.0 to 51.0
33 mcg/ml
Interval 21.0 to 41.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
18 months
19 mcg/ml
Interval 9.0 to 50.0
24 mcg/ml
Interval 15.0 to 32.0
Between-Group Difference in Median Serum GM-CSF Autoantibody (GMAb) Levels
30 months
19 mcg/ml
Interval 9.0 to 50.0
12 mcg/ml
Interval 9.0 to 33.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Analysis Method: Between-group difference in WBC counts at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. The WBC counts were determined via complete blood count.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
7.7 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.8
6.2 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.2
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
Baseline (Month 0)
7.5 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.7
8.7 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 2.7
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
1 month
6.8 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.6
6.4 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.6
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
3 months
6.8 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.4
5.9 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.1
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
6 months
6.8 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.6
6.2 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.3
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
10 months
67 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.8
6.1 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.1
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
18 months
6.8 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.6
6.5 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 10
Between-Group Difference in Mean White Blood Cell (WBC) Counts
30 months
6.8 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.6
6.1 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 1.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Analysis Method: Between-group difference in platelet counts at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. The platelet counts were determined via complete blood count.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
6 months
267 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 42
238 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 45
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
10 months
269 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 50
242 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 49
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
30 months
263 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 53
232 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 46
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
18 months
263 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 54
236 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 42
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
289 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 96
236 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 56
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
Baseline (Month 0)
290 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 111
269 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 73
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
1 month
266 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 57
248 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 46
Between-Group Difference in Mean Platelet Counts
3 months
280 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 83
252 x10^6 cells/ml
Standard Deviation 42

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Primary Analysis: Between-group difference in mean SF-36 General Health Score at each study visit after the scheduled baseline WLL was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjustment for baseline values, gender, age, and the number of patients at risk at each time point. Secondary analysis: Between-group difference in SF-36 General Health Score at each visit after imputation of missing data by the last observation carried forward method. The SF-36 General Health Score were determined from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Scoring the SF-36 questionnaire is a two-step process. First, pre-coded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key. All items are scored on a scale of 0 to 100 so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, General Health is determined from the average score for questions 1, 33, 34, 35, and 36.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral whole lung lavage (WLL) at baseline (month 0). Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) lung disease as defined in the protocol.
GM-CSF Group
n=9 Participants
All participants received a scheduled bilateral WLL at baseline (month 0). All participants received inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Sargramostim, 250 mcg) administered once daily every other week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period without administration, followed by administration on days 1 and 3 of every consecutive 14-day period for 6 months. Unscheduled rescue WLL was administered, as required, to any participant who experienced progression of PAP lung disease as defined in the protocol.
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
Pre-WLL (Month -1)
44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27
39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
1 month
77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20
85 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
3 months
79 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18
93 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
6 months
77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22
95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
10 months
72 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26
84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
18 months
74 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26
84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18
Between-Group Difference in Mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) General Health Score
30 months
71 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28
88 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7

Adverse Events

Control Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

GM-CSF Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Francesca Mariani

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia

Phone: +39 0382 503590

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place