Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Controlled Laboratory Study of the Effects on Cue-Induced Craving in Dependent Smokers (NCT NCT00901459)
NCT ID: NCT00901459
Last Updated: 2013-01-25
Results Overview
Cigarette craving was assessed orally during each rTMS Session, before and after each stimulus presentation and cigarette smoking with a brief version of the Shiffman-Jarvik questionnaire (14), which contained items assessing cigarette craving using the following subscale: CRAVING ("urges to smoke," "miss a cigarette," and "crave cigarettes"), MOOD ("calm," "tense," and "irritable"), AROUSAL ("wide awake," "able to concentrate"), and HUNGER ("feel hungry"). The scale for the Shiffman-Jarvik questionnaire is a Likert item scale with measurements 1-Not at All; 2-Very Little; 3-A Little; 4-Moderately; 5- A Lot; 6-Quite A Lot and 7-Extremely. The change in craving for cigarettes after smoking cues versus neutral cues using the parenthetical items listed above with the subscale CRAVING were used to determine the primary outcome. A negative value represents a decrease in reported cigarette craving.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
21 participants
Following exposure to in vivo cues
2013-01-25
Participant Flow
The first participant was consented on 5/12/2009 and the final participant on 6/22/2010 at the Duke Center for Nicotine and Smoking Cessation Research. During the recruitment phase of the study 148 potential subjects were consented and 7 read the consent form and chose not to participate.
Of the 148 participants that were consented for this study only 21 subjects met study criteria the others were excluded from participation for the following reasons: 70-Did Not Meet Inclusion Criteria 6-Lab Results 6-Lost to Contact 26-Medical 14-Met exclusion criteria 3-Refused to participate 2-Unable To Meet Study Requirements
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Study Participants
Active:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
Location Control:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Motor Cortex
Frequency Control:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 10 Hz rTNS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Study Participants
Active:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
Location Control:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Motor Cortex
Frequency Control:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 10 Hz rTNS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Controlled Laboratory Study of the Effects on Cue-Induced Craving in Dependent Smokers
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Study Participants
n=21 Participants
Active:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
Location Control:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Motor Cortex
Frequency Control:
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 10 Hz rTNS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Following exposure to in vivo cuesPopulation: A repeated measures design exposed participants to three different rTMS conditions over 3 separate visits, with order counterbalanced using latin square design.
Cigarette craving was assessed orally during each rTMS Session, before and after each stimulus presentation and cigarette smoking with a brief version of the Shiffman-Jarvik questionnaire (14), which contained items assessing cigarette craving using the following subscale: CRAVING ("urges to smoke," "miss a cigarette," and "crave cigarettes"), MOOD ("calm," "tense," and "irritable"), AROUSAL ("wide awake," "able to concentrate"), and HUNGER ("feel hungry"). The scale for the Shiffman-Jarvik questionnaire is a Likert item scale with measurements 1-Not at All; 2-Very Little; 3-A Little; 4-Moderately; 5- A Lot; 6-Quite A Lot and 7-Extremely. The change in craving for cigarettes after smoking cues versus neutral cues using the parenthetical items listed above with the subscale CRAVING were used to determine the primary outcome. A negative value represents a decrease in reported cigarette craving.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=15 Participants
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
Location Control
n=15 Participants
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Motor Cortex
|
Frequency Control
n=15 Participants
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 10 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Craving for Cigarettes After Smoking Cues Versus Neutral Cues Using a Repeated Measure Design.
|
-.18 units on a scale
Standard Error .95
|
.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.30
|
1.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After smoking a cigarette through the controlled puff volume apparatus during rTMSCraving reduction was assessed orally by an item on the cigarette evaluation questionnaire ("Did it immediately reduce your craving for cigarettes?") after smoking presentations through the controlled puff volume apparatus.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=15 Participants
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
Location Control
n=14 Participants
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 1 Hz rTMS Location: Motor Cortex
|
Frequency Control
n=15 Participants
rTMS Dosing: 90% MT (Motor Threshold) 10 Hz rTMS Location: Superior Frontal Gyrus
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Craving for Cigarettes After Controlled Smoke Presentations.
|
-.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .95
|
.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
1.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
Adverse Events
Active
Location Control
Frequency Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jed E. Rose, Ph.D.
Duke Center for Nicotine and Smoking Cessation Research
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place