Antibiotic Therapy After Incision and Drainage for Abscess

NCT ID: NCT00900510

Last Updated: 2017-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Skin abscesses are a growing problem in the general pediatric population around the world. While the standard treatment for an abscess/boil is incision and drainage, many physicians also prescribe antibiotics, despite the lack of evidence that antibiotics are necessary to help the wound heal. The purpose of this research study is to determine whether antibiotics are necessary after incision and drainage of a skin abscess in children. This is an important question because medical evidence has shown that using antibiotics when they are not needed has contributed to the increase of bacterial antibiotic resistance. In fact, several of the antibiotics that successfully killed Staph bacteria several years ago are now no longer effective because of antibiotic resistance. Now resistant forms of Staph bacteria, called "Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staph Aureus" (CA-MRSA), account for 50-85% of all pediatric skin abscesses. If antibiotics are not necessary then withholding them when appropriate may help slow the progression of antibiotic-resistant Staph infections.

Objective(s) and Hypothesis(es): The investigators believe that antibiotics are no better than placebo at achieving a cure after drainage of an abscess in a child. The objective of this study is to answer the question: Do antibiotics after abscess drainage result in a better chance of cure than placebo?

Potential Impact: If abscess drainage alone is shown to be as effective as drainage followed by antibiotics, then the routine use of antibiotics for this problem could be avoided. This would help limit the increasing antibiotic resistance of bacteria (especially CA-MRSA) in communities around the world. A well-designed study may provide the evidence to change the way children are treated for abscesses in a future where antibiotic resistant bacteria will be even more of a public health challenge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abscess

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

subcutaneous abscess Incision and drainage Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Drainage and placebo

Incision and drainage with placebo.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Incision and drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Drainage with TMP/SX

Drainage with Bactrim

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim)

Intervention Type DRUG

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, oral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incision and drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim)

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any child (age 6 months-18 years old) that:

* does not meet criteria for hospitalization and
* has only one localized abscess (\>/= 2 cm of erythema and induration), which is clinically judged to be amenable to incision and drainage. (i.e., on clinical exam their is fluctuance, erythema, induration, and/or purulent drainage)
* has an abscess that is ± 7 days from onset, who requires surgical incision and drainage for a skin and soft-tissue abscess

Exclusion Criteria

* children \< 6 months of age
* children who require inpatient hospitalization - children with a medical condition in which adjuvant antibiotic therapy would be accepted standard of practice (i.e., history of neutropenia, cardiac surgery, indwelling prosthesis)
* children with a previously diagnosed immunodeficiency (HIV, Chronic Granulomatous Disease, Job's syndrome, chronic steroid use)
* children hospitalized within 2 months of presentation (due to higher rate of nosocomial MRSA colonization)
* abcesses located on the head or neck
* children with history of a sulfa allergy
* abscesses caused by animal bite wounds
* children with Diabetes Mellitus
* abscesses arising from tattooing
* abscesses arising from vaccination sites
* pregnant females
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Pranikoff, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00008450

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id